this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

1356 readers
8 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For example, I know that the Siege of Stalingrad was extremely important, but I don’t get why the Soviets taking the city was enough for the Nazis to lose the entire Caucasus region.

(edit: Thanks for the answers!)

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Logistics: train hubs, river shipping, harbours are all centered around cities. Stalingrad was a train nexus and important for river shipping oil up from the Caucasus.

Industry: That stuff is in cities. Useful to yourself, and the deny the other side.

Fortification: Large complexes can be turned into strong defensive positions. Even a wholy bombed out city provides lots of cover. Large sevage systems allow for hidden troop movement.

Population control: Depending of the grade of urbanisation, taking control of cities means having large chunks of the population in your hand, less people to join the other side, more to work with yours.

Loot: Lots of booty in them cities. Many people close together means more loot close together. Important for the likes of Daesh, Israel or the Nazis.

As for Stalingrad: For the soviets it was a important city, but not central to the war effort. The Axis went for it because of the Name, same with Leningrad. The Soviets commited a staunch defense because it was a good psoition to hold the Axis advance.

The axis advance into the caucasus happened before Stalingrad. When that stalled, the Axis went for Stalingrad to hurt soviet logistics, and because evil Stalin city. The Axisa got kicked out from the caucasus and most of Kuban when the dispersed retreating soviet units rallied, reorganized and rejoined the battle. That lead to a massive numerical superiority against the Axis in the region. A numerical inferior force can hold off a superior one, but not in the steppe without any natural defensive positions like rivers. The axis army in Stalingrad got cut off by soviet far eastern forces freed up as a result of the non-aggression pact with Japan. That pact freed up a lot of well equipped, trained and fresh forces for the Red Army.

[–] demeritum@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 3 days ago

The nazis were thinly spread in the Caucasus in the first place. Cities can be defensible locations.

[–] Noodles4dinner@hexbear.net 0 points 3 days ago

Cute coffee shops, bike trails, night life, large buildings that can be turned into prisons.

[–] starkillerfish@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 3 days ago

Logistical / train hubs

[–] opiumfree@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

city have industry. its good to take factory and warehouses, more stuff for war

city have a lot of people and resources like fuel for tanc and food for soldier. this is good. this is especially good for past war where city have the most.

this is even better if city is the capital because this is where the government building is. if take over capital, this weaken whole government of enemy.

morale is important for soldier. if no morale, soldier dont care. if important city for national pride like capital is overtaken, soldier get sad and fight not good.

[–] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Cities are also logistical hubs that enable efficient distribution of forces and supplies along the front line and facilitate advances.

They are also easier to turn into command hubs and fortified positions than random fields and forests, particularly cities that are as solidly built as Soviet cities, with factories, concrete and brick buildings, apartment blocks, basements, etc.

Stalingrad in particular was vital because holding it enabled control over traffic on the Volga river, which was essential to Soviet logistics.