this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

1356 readers
6 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For example, I know that the Siege of Stalingrad was extremely important, but I don’t get why the Soviets taking the city was enough for the Nazis to lose the entire Caucasus region.

(edit: Thanks for the answers!)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] opiumfree@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

city have industry. its good to take factory and warehouses, more stuff for war

city have a lot of people and resources like fuel for tanc and food for soldier. this is good. this is especially good for past war where city have the most.

this is even better if city is the capital because this is where the government building is. if take over capital, this weaken whole government of enemy.

morale is important for soldier. if no morale, soldier dont care. if important city for national pride like capital is overtaken, soldier get sad and fight not good.

[–] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Cities are also logistical hubs that enable efficient distribution of forces and supplies along the front line and facilitate advances.

They are also easier to turn into command hubs and fortified positions than random fields and forests, particularly cities that are as solidly built as Soviet cities, with factories, concrete and brick buildings, apartment blocks, basements, etc.

Stalingrad in particular was vital because holding it enabled control over traffic on the Volga river, which was essential to Soviet logistics.