this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
716 points (99.2% liked)

politics

31534 readers
2334 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump’s administration is threatening to withdraw federal funding for unemployment assistance in all 50 states as part of the president’s nationwide campaign against “fraud” in government spending.

In a letter to the governors of 53 states and territories, acting Labor Secretary Keith Sonderling warned that the federal government would use “every available tool” to combat “waste, fraud and abuse” within state-run unemployment insurance programs, including “withholding administrative funds from states” for the first time in history.

There is no single national program for unemployment support, though the federal government partners with state agencies to support temporary financial assistance to out-of-work Americans. Nearly 2 million people are currently receiving those benefits, while roughly 229,000 people are filing initial jobless claims every week, according to the Labor Department.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 283 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The waste fraud and abuse are coming from inside the house.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 53 points 4 months ago (3 children)

And the senate, and the White House, and mar a lago

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I'm not sure you're getting the reference.

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They could have been thinking of the House part of Congress, since they only listed the Senate.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ZeroCool@piefed.ca 165 points 4 months ago (2 children)

“The American people will no longer tolerate the blatant waste, fraud and abuse of their hard-earned tax dollars — no state should allow it either,”

Excuse me? If anything, the 2024 election made it crystal clear that the American people will, in fact, tolerate the blatant waste, fraud, and abuse of our hard-earned tax dollars. 77 million people actually voted for it.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 57 points 4 months ago (1 children)

they even published a fucking playbook called project 2025.

dumbfucks

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 35 points 4 months ago (6 children)

But they super promised they never even heard of it or was going to use it. Then installed its writers in key positions. Purely by happenstance.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago (4 children)

One of the things I hated so much about the 2024 election was all the fucking gaslighting about it, too. There were plenty saying "isn't that just a liberal conspiracy theory" and bullshit about "blue maga" (lol, whatever) and lots of the corporate media doing that sort of collective shrug about a documented plan.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 150 points 4 months ago (16 children)

Trump and the Republicans want to kill poor people.

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 58 points 4 months ago (1 children)

& they are succeeding, worldwide

[–] massacre@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago

And you know what happens? This makes the next group of people, i.e. middle class, the next poors! Guess what they want to do to the new poors?

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] alexc@lemmy.world 78 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Waste and fraud… If only someone hadn’t started a war with Iran and then paid them $300B three months later to end it, gaining precisely nothing…

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 35 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And spent 14 million painting a pool blue?

[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 16 points 4 months ago

And renaming the color green to blue

[–] sns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 67 points 4 months ago (4 children)

How do empires die?

Gradually then suddenly.

The US is in the latter stage.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world 66 points 4 months ago (6 children)

This stunt actually has nothing to do with "fraud" in government spending, but as someone with experience in government procurement, contracting is where the waste is. The government actually doesn't do too badly when we keep the work in-house. It's these multimillion dollar contracts to some private company that are where the waste, fraud, and abuse are. Go fucking audit SpaceX. Revisit those contracts. Bet we can save billions every year on just one companies stupid fucking defense contracts. Then go after the rest of these contractors. Threaten to bring the work back in house and see how they react. Follow through and actually bring the work back in house, build the public sector engineering and manufacturing expertise, and see where we are.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 53 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago (3 children)

But by now, everyone either knows or refuses to acknowledge that the President is a notorious pedophile.

A sudden spike in unemployment followed by waves of debt default, foreclosure, and police actions on the unemployed would seem to be the more pressing issue.

This just feels like the Iran "Today's bombing a girl's school distracts from who the President was fucking in 1997" Epstein War bullshit.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

They want you so desperate to cling to employment that you will no longer care about working conditions or fair wages or be willing to endanger said employment by being politically active.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Yeah...

But they're idiots.

There's not enough jobs to go around, people won't quietly starve. And the only people with anything to steal from are the wealthy.

They just created a shit ton of people with literally nothing to lose.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Leather@lemmy.world 44 points 4 months ago
[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 42 points 4 months ago (18 children)

What he wants:

  • desperate people who work for scraps
  • riots, so he can call in the military and call off the election

What he (hopefully) gets:

  • a revolution

Seriously, why aren't billionaire villas burning? Why is Mar-a-Lagos still standing? I'm surprised how much the American people are willing to endure.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 37 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It’s like they are testing limits. They keep doing crazier shit week after week then say well no one is doing anything about it so let’s keep going.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 36 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"Lets do something fast and stupid so they stop talking about me starting and losing a war."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago (3 children)

This is next distraction away from his complete failure in Iran and his green, moldy swimming pool. He's giving $300 billion to Iran in his total surrender, what's the total amount of assistance to be withheld in funding here?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 34 points 4 months ago (2 children)

president’s nationwide campaign against “fraud” in government spending.

Projection much, huh?

[–] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

Also privilege, Republicans see themselves as privileged, it's not fraud when they do it, they are allowed, it's fraud when others without sufficient privilege do it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 33 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Good do it. Let the states that still have a sense of sanity group up and implement a multistate unemployment assistance strategy. Seriously, perhaps its time blue states encourage the disempowerment of the federal government and transfer those programs to mutually aligned state initiatives. Leave out all the welfare red states and redirect that transfer of wealth from blue states to red states, back to their own ppl. Americas system of statehood and states rights is something dems should probably start proposing making more use of. If feds under Trump don't want social programs then build multistate programs that serve that function, leaving out the Maga central states altogether.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] relativestranger@feddit.nl 32 points 4 months ago (1 children)

the "fraud" starts and ends at the oval office. investigate that s.o.b. first.

[–] Poojabber@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

Thats not true. My state governor is also a criminal and is grifting on a state level too...

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 25 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Have to imagine this will disproportionately hurt red states and then they'll blame it on Obama or Biden or something. Really hoping some state will withhold federal taxes but I know our leaders are too spineless for that :[

[–] Haze@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

California funds its own unemployment benefits, of course Trump is too stupid to know this.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 4 months ago (3 children)

pls no, this would make the crime rate skyrocket

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago (8 children)

That's what the federal cabal wants.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BucketBong@p.hobo.social 23 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Are we at the beheading part of history yet?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He just had dinner at Versailles, home of Marie Antoinette.

He's had numerous "Let them eat cake moments," most recently his "I love the Inflation" moment, and sooner or later he's going to cross the wrong line when the timing is right, and he'll meet the same fate.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ChetManly@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He's gotta do something to pay Iran 300b.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

The new distraction from the Epstein files is here!

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

I don’t know why this is a surprise to anyone. Trump is famous for not paying contractors and workers. He waits it out until they sue and his expensive lawyers beep the plaintiffs dry or settle for some fraction of the contract price.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 months ago
[–] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So Trump is tanking the economy and burning through cash so bad he has to take money from people without jobs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Check me if I’m wrong but the only thing he can cut is the administration funding. The actual benefits are funded by a type of insurance companies pay into. Trump can’t take that away.
All this will do is make processing claims a bitch.

He’s such a dick.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Jokes on them, it's basically impossible to get unemployment here to start with.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

WTAF? We all pay into this shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

An actual traitor president and it looks like we're just gonna ride it out with our fingers crossed.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›