they used to call him the deref king back in college
this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
548 points (94.2% liked)
Programmer Humor
32251 readers
1104 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Worse version of this
AAAWWW THIS IS SOOO CUUUTE
Null termination is no longer recommended, use fat pointers instead!
Why would I want to be shown the concept of pointers by an eight year old?
I'll have you know, she's canonically 300 years old
Nah, she's 5 or younger. She lied about being 6 (school age) to get adopted. It's a very wholesome story (if you disregard the war, political intrigue and terrorism).
And the fact that Anya's best friend is trying to break up Anya's parents because she has a crush on the dad
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
It's a good reference (lol) even if it's getting downvoted
Wait. It’s been a long time but shouldn’t be int*** -> int** -> int* -> int ?
I think int*** is meant to be pointing at int**, but the image is just unclear about where everything is in perspective.
Pretty sure the image is clear:
int*** -> int*
int** -> int
Int* -> int
Clarity doesn’t mean correct. But that’s probably why it’s posted here. 🤷♂️
int** is inside a TV, and persumably int* must be inside another TV(even though uts not edited in). The image perespective is showing one thing inside the other, inside the other. So when when int*** points the TV it reference int**, which reference int* which reference int. Its just edited very bad
RT*** isn't pointing at RT*, he's pointing at the TV showing RT**. The fact you think otherwise is what makes the image unclear. I'm not sure why you insist on them being wrong.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(6 replies)
I mean, that's pretty much what happens to me every time I try to use pointers, so the meme checks out.
yep this is just someone misunderstanding pointers lol
load more comments
(1 replies)
Rumble Tumble Games in the wild
Seeing him break containment is wild
Didn't expect to see the Drift King here
Drift King? You mean Dan the Villian
as a python script kiddie, this is way over my head, but upvoted because of RT Game
So, googling it, the general premise is you should use smart pointers instead to avoid crashes. Got it.
Smart pointers implies C++, which is not the right answer.
Unlike many other programming languages, which are often picked up on the go from tutorials found on the Internet, few are able to quickly pick up C++ without studying a well-written C++ book. It is way too big and complex for doing this. In fact, it is so big and complex, that there are very many very bad C++ books out there. And we are not talking about bad style, but things like sporting glaringly obvious factual errors and promoting abysmally bad programming styles.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/388242/the-definitive-c-book-guide-and-list
Considering that most of the "answers" I've found on StackOverflow were complete dogshit, I'm wary of this reading list
Uh
I think I'll just let the cat drive instead
They all have footguns that cause different crashes.
If you want to do explicit memory access without inevitable safety problems, you need Rust. That's the whole hype with Rust.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Why should the left one in the rectangle be int**? It doesn't make sense to me, they are both clearly just int*
What am i missing?
I they're supposed to be pointing at each other but the edit didn't really work because his arm is pointing too far away
Perspective innit
Real talk: is there any practical use-case for T*** of any pointee type?
Dynamically allocated multidimensional arrays.
Ah right, so that would be a 3D array.
T*is a single row ofTT**is a list of rowsT***is a list of "layers" in the third dimension
This would be incredibly hazardous to pass around as a bare pointer with no context, though. I'd expect to see this in a struct that, at minimum, also includes fields for the size of each dimension.
This ~~Sparta~~ C. We live for danger.
Tesseract Array
load more comments
(3 replies)
Now that explain the & part of the pointers that I never really understood.
The & operator references the value.
int i;
int* p = &i;
In C++, the & at the function argument makes it a reference type (safe pointer).
void someFunction(int& refVal) {
[...]
}
load more comments
(12 replies)
*x = dereference or "point to". Treats the variable x as containing a pointer value. Evaluates to a variable existing at the address in x.
&x = reference or "get address of". Evaluates to the address of x.
They're complimentary operators, so *(&x) cancels out and is equvalent to just x.
C# delegates enter the chat and nod.
that's not LaurieWired
view more: next ›