Oi! I'm a lazy programmer with no friends, and I will not take this slander!
Susaga
Actually, if the onion ran info wars, it would tell people the site is satire. Which would be the first piece of correct information on the platform.
We don't have a community called "quantum superposition of onion", so this will have to do
The trope falsely portrays Islam as a uniquely violent religion, despite historical and contemporary violence committed by individuals of various religious and ideological backgrounds.
That's from the wiki page you said had nothing on blasphemous killings. It's not Islamic praxis, it's historical religious praxis. Maybe if you didn't skip straight to "denialism and criticism" as your links prove, you would have noticed that.
But I can see you prefer to read obscure blogs from 10 years ago with incendiary titles, a disclaimer about the writers views at the bottom, and an entire section titled "Islam vs Civilisation". That's definitely a trustworthy source, and not at all concerning why you have a link to that.
The question you claim wasn't answered was built on a false premise, using deeply islamaphobic tropes as a foundation, and any answer that builds on your question would be just as wrong. This is what their link explains, which you would know if you read it. But you didn't do that, and you chose to pretend your question had not been answered so you could keep being islamaphobic.
You didn't say shit about genocide.
YDM
I decided to look it up, just to be sure. Specifics vary based on where you are, but depicting anything too extreme is generally gonna be illegal. Even if it's legal in the bedroom, it's not necessarily legal in porn.
Heck, I'm British, and the age of consent is 16. It's 18 in porn, though.
It's also really efficient, setting up the entire relationship with just the word "step-bro". Plus, it's taboo enough for the characters to say "we shouldn't", but not SO taboo that the viewer thinks they actually shouldn't.
I remember reading a while ago that, because you can't have full incest in porn, the Game of Thrones porn parody (or, at least, one of them) was LESS explicit than the show.
And no. No we're not. I doubt many places are.
Is this a humiliation kink thing? I can get how you'd mistake "top 65%" as a good thing and send it to your friends (not because it's confusing, but because you're in the top 65%). But then you post your low IQ to multiple communities while making it clear you didn't understand the results page.
I'd be embarrassed just admitting I took an online IQ test.
My first thought was "because they're getting hotter", which didn't seem like a Guardian article.
You think these fuckers are giving us cake?