this post was submitted on 31 May 2026
172 points (95.3% liked)

World News

56798 readers
1740 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 80 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Who could have ever foreseen this result when we outsourced all of our manufacturing and skilled labour to China???

It's almost like chasing thoughtless, short-term profit gains is a horrible idea.

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Our design engineering is lacking too. I read not long ago how the president of Ford said how they tore down a Chinese EV and said “we got it all wrong.” I’m in the automotive manufacturing industry and we source some parts from China. The factories I work with are all IATF/ISO certified and they can make parts for 10x less AND not require a minimum production that would last me 5 years. And the comment about working around the tariff is absolutely true. One of our Chinese suppliers started building a plant in Thailand not long after the election. State of the art. less tariff. Quality parts. My first order is shipping this week.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 weeks ago

Chinese industry knows how to manufacture at scale. With a hundred year head start, US auto manufacturing is still a joke.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago

I mean, from what I can see half of them aren't even trying.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 42 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

The world's car makers struggled to compete with Japan back in the '70s, but I would argue that struggle gave people access to better vehicles.

Turned out the winning move was to make affordable cars that were fuel efficient to operate and people would rush to buy them.

[–] farmgineer@nord.pub 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Japan even failed to learn from Japan judging by everything I see here. Not necessarily as badly as the US mfgs did, but still. Especially for those chasing hydrogen right now and Nissan going through its thing (and I drive a Nissan kei car).

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (3 children)

Nissan/Honda/Toyota/Subaru have the worst EVs on the market. They learned nothing lol.

Bad screens, tiny screens, bad software, uncompetitive range, bad interior, zero competitive features above the competition.

Japan is an insular society that discourages talking out against your superiors in the work environment, so this was bound to happen in the days of the aging-out boomers holding onto leadership positions. With the head start that Japan had, they should’ve produced a 1:1 Tesla in 5 years, but they didn’t. It’s been 15 years since the best cars hit the market, and now China leapfrogged Tesla to be the best like Japan did to American car makers 40 years ago.

All of this was made possible by Chinese government cash infusions and social programs to invest in car manufacturing/ecosystems. The west did that in 2010, but let the companies spend the money how they wanted (the top executives were allowed to get away with embezzling all of it. surprise!) with no stipulations, and that’s how we got to where we are today.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DisasterTransport@startrek.website 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

But that requires R&D, and that means hiring and paying more engineers! And maintaining multiple production lines! And paying people to work on those! Can't we just make a law that all Americans have to buy an F-150 by the time they turn 30???

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Alternate headline: "The World's Carmakers Have Become Too Fat And Bloated To Compete With China".

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This is my take too.

It's not that America and Europe can't compete. It's that they've got their fat asses propped up on piles of misbegotten cash and are too fucking lazy and greedy to make a good product.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

I wonder if the fact that most American and European carmakers are stubbornly clinging to the 1800s technology known as the internal combustion engine while Chinese ones are actively embracing the modern technology that car buyers actually want has anything to do with it 🤔

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What? Rubbish. Total incomprehensible rubbish.
Right, time to get the coal burning in my steam tractor!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago (5 children)

It probably has more to do with the cost of labour in China.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago (15 children)

That's another part of it, sure, but DEFINITELY not the whole or even main reason.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TuringCompleteSocialist@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Then don't. Make cities walkable and invest in public transport.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 4 weeks ago

China is also doing that, believe it or not.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 weeks ago

In my experience, the best we can do is change the bus schedules so you have to walk further to a bus stop and wait longer for a bus that never arrives at the scheduled time...

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

This would be ideal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grumpus_Maximus@thelemmy.club 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

They go for next quarter profits instead of value for consumers . Stopped building affordable cars favoring trucks. Shipped car industry to China. The end

[–] tacoplease@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago

Went for trucks for greater profit margin and lower regulations but lost the volume game. For capitalists, they sure suck at it.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Even if you ignore the US obsession with trucks, western manufacturers labour costs are much higher and there aren't subsidies on manufacturing EVs, only buying them. Chinese EVs get manufacturing subsidies and then in many countries they also get a local subsidy at the point of purchase. It's an underhanded tactic, the Chinese government is essentially paying people outside of China to buy Chinese EVs so western competiton would die.

[–] Grumpus_Maximus@thelemmy.club 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

they have all the manufacturing there, I'm sure all the parts are dirt cheap for them if you don't ship em cross ocean.

I'm not sure about china paying for you to buy them, many countries counter that with tariffs. I think those prices are close to natural prices given the enormous scale of china and nearby markets.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Yes, the tariffs counter the artificially low price. At least on the more expensive models, as tariffs aren't a flat fee per car like the subsidies. You're then still left with a workforce that's paid about a third if not a quarter of what they'd be paid in some European countries that manufacture cars.

If we really wanted European EVs to be competitive with Chinese, unions need to be abolished and wages lowered. Unfortunately, we ALSO want people to have good living conditions, so that's sort of a no-go.

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Are you implying Chinese people do not have good living conditions?

I have been in China only a few months working on the assembly line. Work was long and tough, but the pay was good and they'd give you free housing and food. Plenty other workplaces were available if you wanted to work less hours.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] tacoplease@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

US car makers get tax incentives and bailouts, effectively subsidized by the government as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

It’s an underhanded tactic

It’s a normal tactic

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 21 points 4 weeks ago

Maybe they should try practical and repairaible cars for a change?

[–] PodPerson@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 weeks ago
[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago

Think U.S. car manufacturers did a couple billion of of stock buybacks over the last few years. If only they had invested that money back into the business to make better vehicles.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 weeks ago

You mean China has a comparative advantage? Maybe the West should make more port instead.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Short term profit and doing compliance cars and half assed attempts with certain irrelevance in a decade or so, or choosing to forgo profit and really go for converting to EV.

Every board room figuring a golden parachute in 10 years sounds really good.

[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

They don't even need cars to do it. The BBSHD kit from Bafang I'm gonna throw on the bike I'm building will save me thousands of miles on my existing car.

China is keeping me from buying a new car by helping not need to use one.

[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 weeks ago

Cool. Let everyone buy them. Competition is good.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 4 points 4 weeks ago

For years it was all about cheap labour in China but what it really is about is innovation and robots. Western car makers have largely missed the warnings by assuming the Chinese market was like our own.

The other point is that capitalism has been whinging about market distortion while the Chinese government was planning for dominance.

  1. Lobby to become the default mode of transportation in the postwar period
  2. Get dragged kicking and screaming towards efficiency
  3. Successfully lobby to gut regulations and manufacture demand for SUVs and crew cab pickups
  4. Stop building cars altogether
  5. Help get a fascist elected who kicks off another oil crisis
  6. Cry about China eating your lunch
[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

China funds all these companies and their projects, that's why China is pushing forward.

[–] Peck@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

So like you think us and Europe not prepping their manufacturing by combination of loans and tax breaks?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›