Technology

On that note, I had latest Claude Opus xhigh write me some code.

If a user passed an empty string to the user_id field it would give them access to everyone’s data. How that worked was a check like “if user_id: # add user id to query”. Empty strings are falsy in Python, so empty user id retrieves all data.

A function later on was filtering these results out coincidentally, but not specifically. So if this shipped, in a month when someone updated the code, we’d be allowing an empty login form to access all user data.

This is the slop getting shipped by AI code assistants. This is why I am rewriting the whole project manually.

VR did not take off, but for wildly different reasons than what you state.

A steam deck or a games console also need expensive special equipment (in form of the console) that has no other use. Still they are thriving.

They also need expensive powerful graphics hardware for good quality. (Also, standalone VR totally exists and is pretty good nowadays, to the point where I don't see much of a reason to pair my headset to my PC, and I am still rocking a Quest 2. Considering you are quoting "a headset at the Microsoft store", I venture to guess that you haven't tried VR in over half a decade.)

You don't need special equipment if you wear glasses for most headsets, you just wear your glasses inside the VR headset. Source: I have been doing that for years. Glasses compatible VR headsets are a thing and quite common.

VR doesn't cause migraines, migraines are something different. They mainly cause tension headaches and motion sickness. Headsets with better balance (e.g. ones that move the battery to the back of the head or ones that are lighter) reduce tension headaches a lot, and motion sickness differs between people and with practice.

The wide open space is the only actual problem you identified, but also there, VR also works in sitting or stationary standing positions. Full roomscale VR is only required by rather few VR games or apps.

The real issues are:

• VR doesn't have advantages for working. Like, none at all. Meta focussed a lot on working in VR, and that just doesn't work. No advantage means no reason to do it.
• VR works for games, but the inability to develop cross-platform between VR and other platforms means that it's almost completely restricted to VR-exclusives. There are a few non-VR-exclusives with a VR mode, but they usually don't actually take advantage of VR, since they have to work on a flat screen too. This means, not a lot of games and the ones that exist are super low budget.
• Local multiplayer is very difficult for VR. If I want to do local multiplayer on a flat screen console or PC, I need another controller and a place for the second person to sit. For VR I need to buy a second console (headset) and need more floor space. VR multiplayer in the same room often leads to people hitting each other, so to play together it's best to separate between rooms.
• Gaming is often used as a relaxing, chill experience. That doesn't really work in VR, since VR games require you to move. You usually can't just chill on the couch while playing VR.
• VR software and UX is still in its infancy. Compare that to flat screen games, which took about 20-30 years to actually become really good in therms of UX and gameplay. VR hasn't had enough time yet to get there, but it's also not something that can just be forced with more money.

You just described everything wrong with cars when they first came out. Large, uncomfortable, slow, needed expensive infrastructure/hardware. And look at cars now. Size hasn't improved, but everything else has (well, the infrastructure is in place now), and you can't get away from them.

Im saving up for a Steam Frame. Even if it just operates as a screen for my Steam Deck, that's enough for me. Add in some freestanding VR, and maybe a new computer that can handle VR in the future, and I'm as happy as can be.

I'm not saying your opinion is wrong, just not universal, and we are still very early on in the VR/AR market.

yeah i shouldnt have said photo. i agree it IS ai. i meant to say that it even looks like it is. a goofy choice for this article.

innovative tech corp LOL

Ideally, yes.

In practice, if investors think the stock price will be higher in the future, they buy.

Dividends are such a tiny amount compared to the value of the share, that in reality it's all just speculation on how people are going to speculate.