squaresinger

joined 1 year ago
[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I like that this is posted on a site called commondreams

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Ah, confused the two. The worse looking version (PS1, PC) is less book accurate, and the newer version (PS2) is more book accurate. Oh well.. Maybe I'll get the newer version then for my kids.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Vetting sources is the one thing we need journalists for. If they don't vet their sources, their work is without merit.

Reading at least the methodology section of a paper and googling if the researchers and the institute exists, is the bare minimum of what a decent journalist should do.

If they can't do that, then there's no advantage of a journalist over some random person posting on Facebook. Even Youtubers usually vet their sources better.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

This. Here's a comparable case where human journalists did exactly what LLMs are doing now: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bohannon#Intentionally_misleading_chocolate_study

The difference is the scale.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bohannon#Intentionally_misleading_chocolate_study

Yes, people would exactly do the same, because nobody reads anything but the headline of a paper. Even journalists don't.

AI didn't invent the problem, but it put the problem on steroids.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think I caught an RSV virus from you.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (3 children)

https://xkcd.com/978/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bohannon#Intentionally_misleading_chocolate_study

We did the same before AI. AI is once again just putting an old problem on steroids.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, there's like two projects that use Haskell. Doesn't change the fact that it's the language that most people know and will never write anything productive in it.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fashion really does go in cycles.

This here.

When I got into programming I figured it would be mostly linear technological progression. Every once in a while something new gets invented that's better than the last iteration, so we discard the last option (except for legacy stuff) and everyone moves to the better thing.

But since then everything that was cool back then became uncool and cool again at least once.

I like the SQL/No-SQL cycle. SQL is powerful, but it's also slow and clunky and if you do it badly it gets really slow. So we invented No-SQL DBs. They are fast, lightweight, but also barebones and limited. So we add functionality here and there, and before we know it we have another variant of SQL with a different syntax. So we head back to use real SQL. But then we realize it's slow and clunky and if you do it badly it gets really slow. So we invent a new No-SQL DB and the cycle continues.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Why do programs written in Haskell not have side effects?

To have side effects someone would have to run the programs.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'd say having a study participant trying to commit suicide because of the birth control is kinda severe.

But also look at who cancelled the study. Was it the participants? Was it the potential customers? Or was it a company that was afraid of lawsuits?

I don't like you trying to blame "the men" because some suits pulled the plug because they feared losing money.

The thing with the vasalgel/RISUG thing is that there aren't any reported side effects and it still was cancelled.

If you look at actual research, there's actually quite a demand for novel male contraception methods:

The proportion of male participants in clinical trials reporting willingness to use a male contraceptive ranged from 34% to 82% and the proportion from surveys about hypothetical methods ranged from 14% to 83% [2]. Specific to the United States (US), a population survey conducted in 2002 of 1500 men reported willingness among 49.3% of respondents [6]; two decades later, an online survey of 2066 men from the US and Canada reported willingness among 75% of respondents

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001078242400101X

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I honestly don't see the difference between regular yellow paint, orange sparkles or highlights.

Sparkling loot is something that was common even back in the 90s and likely before that.

If it helps, you can imagine that yellow paint isn't there in-universe but only for the player, just like sparkling loot or highlighted interactive elements.

 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.nl/post/53584210

cross-posted from: https://feddit.nl/post/53584209

There’s a time and place for a shower thought. 😉

 

This is not meant as an attack in any way, anyone can obvously buy whatever makes them happy.

I'm just really curious who buys consoles that aren't that old for such high prices.

I can see the appeal of holding childhood consoles in your hands again, and I can also see the appeal in collecting cool really old stuff. But I struggle to understand why someone would buy e.g. a New 2DS XL for €300 or more.

So just out of curiosity, if you are someone like that, what's the appeal that makes it worth spending so much money, instead of e.g. just going with a steam deck and an emulator instead?

Edit to avoid confusion: I am not talking about new reproduction systems (like the N64 Mini) or premium emulation/FPGA systems (like the Analogue Pocket or the MISTer), but about original game consoles that aren't supported any more but also aren't really old. Something like the DS/3DS, PSP, Wii U, Playstation 3. Some of them are now more expensive in mediocre second-hand condition than they were when they were new.

 

Hear me out:

The only, absolutely only reason why people don't generally marry on the first date is to figure out whether they DON'T fit together.

So if you manage to figure out that the relationship is not going to work out before you get into real commitments (kids, mortgage, ...) you successfully avoided trouble.

I see it so often that people think that dating is already a strong commitment and that ending a dead-end relationship is a failure.

There is no shame in realizing the relationship is going nowhere and ending it.

 

There's really no limit on what can be made to sound good with enough time and skill.

 

First, so I'm not misunderstood: Science does of course exist and it is not religion. But:

  • Not all published science is, in fact, science. The Replication Crisis is a real problem, meaning that a significant portion of published science is actually incorrect.
  • Only a very tiny portion of the population reads scientific papers and has the ability to understand them. That includes scientists and other well-educated people who don't have any expertise on the specific field. Being a renown physicist doesn't mean you know anything about psychology.
  • Scientific papers are filtered through science journalists who might or might not have any expertise in the field and might or might not understand the papers they write about. They then publish what they understood in a more accessible format (e.g. popular science magazines).
  • This is then read by minimum wage journalists with no understanding of any of the science, and they publish their misunderstandings in newspapers and other non-scientific publications.
  • This is then read by the general public who usually lack the skills and/or the resources to fact-check anything at all.
  • These members of the general public then take what they understood as fact and base their world view on it. At this point it hardly matters whether their source of incorrect information is the stack of Chinese whispers I wrote about above, or if it's just straight-up made up by some religious leader.

There's thousands of little (or big) misunderstandings in non-science that people believe and have faith in, that forms people's world views and even their political views. And people often defend their misconceptions, like they would defend some religious views.

(Again, just to make sure I'm not misunderstood: I am no exception to this either. I got my field where I have a lot of knowledge, but for most fields I blindly trust some experts, because I have no way to verify stuff. I, too, for example, put my faith in doctors to heal my illnesses, even though I have no way to verify whether anything they say is true or not.)

1
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by squaresinger@lemmy.world to c/support@lemmy.world
 

Recently I had quite a few softporn images popping up on lemmy.world, e.g. from boobs@lemmy.world or porngifs@lemmy.world.

Was there a rule change that I missed that allows that kind of content now?

The content on that community is also not marked as NSFW, which makes for awkward moments when scrolling lemmy.world on the bus or in the break at work.

 

Well, not exactly modern social media, but very similar mechanics. His dad wrote a book with him as a main character, and he got bullied for it and ended up resenting his parents and hating Winnie the Pooh.

And in keeping with modern-day influencer parents: He actually never really had a lot of a relationship with his parents to begin with. He was raised by a nanny and then put into a boarding school, and only had very little contact with his parents. Later in life, he only sporadically visited his parents, never returned to his childhood home (which was the books were based on) and after his dad died, he completely dropped contact with his mother.

 

I guess, the limit doesn't apply for every country, but at least in Europe it's quite common.

Using an exoskeletton would also get around the speed limit for the pedal assist.

 

Take that (not) Einstein!

 

Ich frag mich echt wie blöd man sein kann. Sowas passiert hier echt grad im Zweiwochentakt.

 

If a country needs to overly emphasise an ideal, that's usually because that ideal doesn't apply in that country ("Land of the free", "Democratic people's republic of ...").

If a person needs to subscribe to patriotism, it's usually because they have never accomplished anything better in their life than being born in a specific place.

view more: next ›