this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
297 points (99.0% liked)

politics

31034 readers
1943 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 71 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Yet theres no political coalition who isn't ready to throw them under the bus for optics at every given chance. How many times are we gonna see over 70% of Americans agree on something that no lawmakers wish to do. Seems the big three right now are Trans Equality, Medicare 4 All, and Legal Weed. And we've had stats on those last two for over a decade. Democracy my ass.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 22 points 4 months ago (2 children)

We’re gonna keep seeing it until we dismantle the “2 party” system which thrives on culture war nonsense, while serving the interests of the billionaires and not the working class.

[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 months ago

Exactly this. Our ‘representatives’ are anything but and the dissonance we feel when learning about new and existing legislation proves who they are actually representing. Again, it’s not the majority they pretend to represent, just those willing to spend.

[–] minnow@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

And, to be clear, we achieve that by changing local election laws to use some form of Rank Choice instead of First Past The Post.

The two party system is an organic result of FPTP voting. If we change to Rank Choice, the two party system will crumble.

[–] Kronusdark@lemmy.world 37 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In my personal experience. Most people hold liberal beliefs when talking about people they directly know.

The trans person they know is fine. They are fine smoking pot. Their friend’s abortion was warranted. The immigrants they go to church with are lovely people.

If you ask even some of the worst MAGA idiots you know if their gay friend should be allowed to marry, they will agree more than you would expect.

Conservative media has created a barrier that allows them to hate groups in a way many would never do IRL.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago

The most frustrating thing for me is people refusing to apply their personal rules to the rest of society and vice versa. There are people who rely on social assistance while politically being against it. And will get abortions themselves whike politically being against it. They just refuse to recognize that if the thing was outlawed it would be outlawed for them too. They expect to be a special exception because their situation is different somehow

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Okay, this comes on behalf of the HRC, and they note this is the methodology.

Data collection was conducted from February 20 through February 23, 2026 among a sample of 1,032 respondents. The survey was conducted via web (n=1,002) and telephone (n=30) and administered in English (n=1,005) and Spanish (n=27).

Already a pretty fucked ratio for the medium. The questions also never get specific about what "equality" entails. It's very general "rights and protections", "access to healthcare", employment discrimination", and "discrimination in schools". Nothing about bathrooms; nothing about gender-affirming care. Basically just "transgender people should be allowed to exist in society".

I'm sure even people who make fun of transgender people behind their backs in a hushed tone would say that they deserve to be able to go to school.

SSRS is okay enough as pollsters go; I just don't think this shows much of anything, because 85% of Americans might begrudgingly say trans people deserve to be able to see a doctor, but certainly 85% do not support actual healthcare trans people need. It's not real equality; it's at best a strictly egalitarian idea of equality where "well I can't do it either (by my arbitrary definitions of "not using the opposite-sex bathroom" and "changing my primary sexual characteristics and/or hormones to those of the opposite sex"), so we're equal," is equality.

[–] faltryka@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Yeah 80% the demo selection here is not representative of the population as a whole it doesn’t smell like, and I think a lot of people read the terms like equality very differently. Seems like it is possibly a pretty misleading survey.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Anyone see that video of PEDOnald asking the DoorDash driver about "men in women's sports"?

I mean....his brain. WTAF. It's really like he's just the walking, talking version of Faux "News".

[–] null@lemmy.org 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Where was that 85% during the fucking election?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The cons effectively made it all about "men in women's sports", I bet.

And that's something where things are nearly the exact opposite other way (80% against). So that's why the conservatives harp on it.

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

?

what do you mean? please elaborate

[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Press X to Doubt

The L.A. Noire meme.

Aka OP doesn’t believe the headline claim.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

It's an older meme sir but it checks out

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Oh I see

I can see why one'd doubt this but I'm pretty confident that it's actually accurate

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

I hope it is, but at the same time it just doesn't seem plausible given all the awful things we see in the news like transphobic legislation being passed in so many places.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Guessing it's the "press x to doubt" meme

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 7 points 4 months ago

Nothing about the % of Americans who think trans people should be able to play HS sports on their new gender.

Because that's like 45%.

Or who think trans youth should have access to gender affirming care, which is similarly low.

And those are the issues that the GOP is hammering, because they know it.

We have to get the spotlight off these issues we got ahead of public perception and there is a cost for that - a whole generation of trans people denied rights (I am less interested in sports than I am gender affirming care, which is hugely important for trans youth).

You can see trans folks realizing this... like 1/2 of the plaintiffs for the sports case that made it to SCOTUS thought the suit should be dropped before it got that far, because they realized it was going to go the wrong way.

It's time to be more strategic until/if the GOP gets out of power, so we stop kneecapping ourselves.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago

I don't get why transgender rights are so damn controversial! I get that some people don't understand it but you shouldn't need to understand it to accept it. And when transphobes concerns are addressed and things are explained to them, they usually choose to keep being ignorant. Like I get that on the surface, it seems like trans women would have an advantage in sports. But when it's explained that they don't, transphobes just choose to keep believing they do. Transphobes say "facts don't care about your feelings" but then ignore the facts because they just feel like it's wrong

[–] homes@piefed.world 3 points 4 months ago
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 2 points 4 months ago

Explains why democrats have recently thrown trans people under the bus.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Unfortunately they don't mean what they should by "equality" because they can say that when denying us self expression or basic respect.