this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
499 points (96.8% liked)

politics

29335 readers
2640 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Fox News Senior Medical Analyst Marc Siegel made some eyebrow-raising comments lamenting that birth rates are down among teenagers aged 15 to 19.

On Thursday, the National Center for Health Statistics reported that the U.S. fertility rate fell to another record low. The agency reported that the number of births per 1,000 women of childbearing age declined from 53.8 in 2024 to 53.1 last year. The latest figure represents a continuation of a decades-long decline in fertility rates.

Siegel joined Friday’s edition of America’s Newsroom, where Dana Perino said that while the continuing trend is not surprising, “the numbers might feel a little shocking.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago

Someone should check that doctor's hard-drives.

[–] maxxadrenaline@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Thats all they care about. Bodies to feed the machine. Gross psychophants. Course kids are more conscious of pregnancy. Just cause theyre young you think theyll give their kids up to governemtn to fight some selfish bigoted war just to die, then work poverty levels never own a home just to feed the 401K of some billionaire while theyre surviving on cheese and crackers. Ugh I HATE these people!!!!!!!!!

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

"We beat teen pregnancy!" - "Oh no!"

Elaborated: "Oh no! Fewer poverty-locked consumer slaves! Who do we convince breast feeding is unhealthy and peddle formula to? How will we paint immigration as a bad thing if unemployment goes down? What if - heaven forbid - social mobility goes up?"

[–] courval@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

How do we blackmail people with no children to work shit jobs?

[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 hour ago

Low birth rate, low immigration, government deep in debt. This looks bad for US retirement plans.

[–] ShittDickk@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago

Sounds like he's one step away from suggesting the law be changed so he can impregnate them.

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago

This is actually one of the only demographics where fertility has fallen. Adult women have been having more or less the same amount of kids for a while now

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 54 points 8 hours ago (5 children)

I have a female coworker and her daughter is currently eight months pregnant at 14 with a 17-year-old father. She couldn’t be happier. She is also a hardcore republican and a diehard Trump supporter.

[–] FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)
[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 5 points 2 hours ago

I knew someone who was by her own description baby-crazy as a teen and basically seeked out someone to knock her up. Hormones are wild things sometimes. Her child did not repeat the cycle fortunately

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 43 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Ruin your kids life early that is the republican motto. Trap them in never ending wage slavery.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 21 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Yep exactly, it runs in her family. She was pregnant with her first baby at 15 and her husband was in his early 40’s. Her husband is older than her dad by 5 years. She is currently 41 and her husband is 73. She also has a younger sister like 5 years younger and I believe she basically did the same thing being pregnant at 15-16 with a much older man.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 7 points 2 hours ago

My wife has one branch of her family where 4 generations occured in a 60 year period, the 5 generation photos are pretty neat, and also I'm really happy for the last generation which broke the cycle.

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Being a teen mom sky rockets the chance your children will become parents as teens

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

Yep, my best friend had his first child at 17 and now that child is 18 with 2 kids already.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 31 points 8 hours ago

I don't like your coworker.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like she has a sweet trailer.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Actually, no, she lives in an old rundown house that has a bunch of Trump Flags and signs and she lives across the street from a Mexican restaurant and she absolutely hates the Mexicans, but loves eating there every night.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Mentally insane

[–] dansemacabreingalone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Damn these (slur) and their delicious food and beautiful decor and lovely music! Damn them! Get out get out get out! And dont come back! (But i would like a refill on my horchata please)

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

That is almost 1:1 what she says.

I hate them as real things, but thryre amazing jokes.

[–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 7 hours ago

Oh no! Sex ed is working and preventing non-ideal pregnancies?! The sky must be falling!

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 29 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

The replacement rate is down to 1.56, meaning every couple is having, on average, 1.56 children in the United States. We need two or above to keep the population at the same amount.

There's actually another way to keep the population up, and it's great for America economically and culturally, and it makes the world a better place at the same time.

[–] running_ragged@lemmy.world 18 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Or maybe we give up on an economic model that requires unending population growth? Since you know, we live on a finite planet?

We have to find a path to degrowth. Stop repeating talking points that imply population growth is our only path forward.

[–] Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Global population growth is happening. Slowing down, but looks inevitable for at least several more decades. Given that baseline, it is optimal for all countries involved to allow immigration from countries with population growth (reduces strain on government services, adds to the economy with remittances) to countries with lower birth rates (tax revenues support social service budgets, increased entrepreneur rate of immigrants increases job growth, etc.)

Economies can transition to population decline while maintaining standards of living for sure, if handled in a planned way. Some short-term pain during the transition, then fine later. But why go through a combination of short-term pain right now, at the same time as incredible cruelty is required to keep out migrants?

A path to degrowth will be needed globally in the medium-term future (finite planet), but trying to implement that now at just the US locally isn't going to help the planet at all.

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Did you not understand that I was talking about immigration? Which is one of the ways we solve that. All of that.

Besides which we're actually talking about keeping the population stable. A declining population is bad for everyone economically. Luckily population growth naturally slows down in modernized societies, which is why allowing people to immigrate is good for everyone.

[–] dansemacabreingalone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

great for america

Oof. Not the selling point you think it is.

makes the world a better place

Theres your problem.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

There’s nothing wrong with doing things that are (legitimately) great for America. I’d love to do things that are great for Russia and Israel too… but it’s unlikely that the leadership in those countries would consider them “great” actions.

[–] dansemacabreingalone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Im saying they dont see it as a selling point. Im speaking of a third party's perspective here. This is a really really basic level of abstraction imusing here, cmon.

[–] __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Who are the "they" that you are referring to? MAGA? Other countries?

This is incredibly tedious. What the fuck?

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 19 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Of course this is a major problem for the pedophile class. For the last 250 years the American Empire was able to function thanks to a countless number of uneducated people locked into perpetual poverty, having children at 14.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

You hit the nail in the coffin, pedophile class is concerned their available victims are declining.

Think of the children('s abusers)!

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 13 points 8 hours ago

Party of pedophiles

[–] Tuxman@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Those 30 years old grandmas will be so proud

🤢

So that’s how they are now making pedophilia more accepted…… this is just great….

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Lol yeah I bet it is $140 for a handful of things at Kroger and $45 at the pump plus $2,000 rent who's having kids!!!

Thats the thing! You dont pay any of that at 14!

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 hours ago

Rich people hoarding money away the rest is what causes less births.

load more comments
view more: next ›