this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
15 points (94.1% liked)

Canada

11877 readers
720 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Am I so out of touch? No... it's the children who are wrong

Obviously its everyone else's fault. Abusive relationship anyone? Pp decides that he hates people leaving him.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Please change the title to the one in the article as per community rule 1.

[–] BC_viper@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I tried, but it said invalid post title.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Try to remove special characters like the ' or :

[–] BC_viper@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago
[–] No_Maines_Land@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd recommend Mr. Pollievre read Jocko Willink's Extreme Ownership.

Leaders dont blame other people. Leaders don't cast failure on others. Leaders don't bitch and moan and hope something gets better.

Instead of finding out why members are leaving his party (disalignment of objectives? Inability to vote off party lines? Not enough cheezies in the break room?) and doing something about it; he is bitching about a system. Now I'm not advocating for the monolithicy of systems, bad or outdated systems must change. But using a system as a sink for accountability if not leadership behaviour.

It's not MY fault members are crossing the floor. It's the fault of the system for letting them change.

Mr. Pollievre, if you cannot lead a party of 140 people. If you cannot reconcile how to align the objectives of 140 people. If you cannot own the concerns of 140 people. Why do you think yourself capable of leading 40,000,000 people? Why do you think you can reconcile the objectives of 40,000,000 people? How do you think you have the capacity to pwn the concerns of 40,000,000 people?

Politics and party objectives ebb and flow, I've voted for just about every major party by this point in my life. But shitty leaders are shitty leaders. Conservative party members deserve more of their party. The house of Commons deserves more of it's opposition. Canadians deserve more of their politicians.

[–] BC_viper@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I voted conservative once. Never again, I saw how fucked they are. This was the first time I ever voted liberal. I don't regret it.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I voted conservative once. Never again

Same. Back when Joe Clark became P.M.

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm convinced that Poilievre is there to be so terrible that the opposition rallies around a single leader/party (Carney ATM), and squeezes out the alternative (NDP).

In other words, his job isn't to win, it's to turn Canada into a two-party system.

[–] patatas@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

I think the most honest thing that Poilievre has ever said was when he told Joe Rogan that (paraphrasing) "if Carney is implementing my agenda, the I've won".

Like, forget a two party system, we're almost at a one party system at this point.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Federally, Canada is already a two party system, in practice.

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not by a long shot.

The fact that only two parties swap leadership back and forth is true, but we frequently have minority governments in Canada; and thst means third parties can act as the deciding factor, and bring pressure on the sitting government.

The reason that the Liberals and the CPC hate the idea of PR is that it would just about end the prospect of majority governments.

[–] patatas@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Agreed. The CPC and LPC want to be able to performatively oppose a majority government when not in power, because both parties now basically agree on dismantling major social programs, expanding fossil fuels, and funneling public money to the corporate and financial elite.

[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Poilievre — and other Conservative MPs — have in the past voted against a bill that would require MPs to automatically face a byelection if they changed parties.

"But that was when I thought they'd be floor crossing to my party!"