this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2026
30 points (73.4% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

9275 readers
193 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I want to curate my feed to mostly just contain serious people. Doesn't matter whether I agree with their views or not - it's all about how those views are expressed. So many people on social media are just thrilled to have a megaphone and the ability to make noise. I don't like noise.

For example, right now there are people who opened the thread just because I put "AI" in the title and they can't wait to share their views about AI in the comments as if it's meaningfully relevant to what I'm saying. They know what I mean, but you can't just miss an opportunity to score a few points dunking on AI, can you?

Whatever gene makes people want to shout these thought-terminating clichés, upvote others who do it, and find some sense of belonging from it is clearly missing from me. I'd rather just not even hear about it - it's extremely exhausting and has never achieved anything worthwhile.

It doesn't really matter whether most people like the smell of your farts or not - you're still poisoning the air.

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I want to curate my feed to mostly just contain serious people.

So I'll just point out that this desire is kind of the whole point of features that allow you to follow specific users on a social media system. This is better when manually curated, rather than relying on some algorithm to do a bad job of it for you. So far, every application of such models to social media tends to amplify noise rather than reduce it, and this is mostly because it does not and cannot replicate human awareness.

The desire for such a function to be performed automatically (without your direct attention and involvement) is diametrically opposed to the desire for high-quality output. Quality requires a level of attention that cannot be automated. The program doesn't care, it's not capable of that.

Reddit-imitating platforms like Lemmy aren't really built for following specific users, the intent is more of a public square. The benefit is that it's harder to end up in an echo chamber (as long as you avoid places like hexbear and .ml where the admins enforce echo chamber conditions intentionally). The cost is that you will always be exposed to some noise. You don't get freedom without some chaos.

Platforms that might provide better what you want would be Mastodon or BlueSky, where you can follow professionals who voice public opinions on topics that you find relevant, and read responses from other users.

Whatever gene makes people want to shout these thought-terminating clichés, upvote others who do it, and find some sense of belonging from it is clearly missing from me. I'd rather just not even hear about it - it's extremely exhausting and has never achieved anything worthwhile.

Hmm, well I'll point out a couple of things:

  1. Self-expression is not really about "achieving" anything.
    There is a level of attention-seeking behavior that can get... cringy? for lack of a better word... but also, like, welcome to the human race, I guess? People want to feel included in the social group, and in the conversation of the moment, and that's entirely normal behavior. Attention-seeking behavior happens because people don't want to feel lonely, and that's OK.
  2. I think you're displaying a degree of entitlement here, where you expect other people to express themselves in a way that you find agreeable.
  3. There is some utility in this overall, as a sort of barometer of public opinion, though you have to be aware of the context of the community you're in. (e.g. a commonly expressed opinion on Lemmy does not necessarily reflect a common opinion of people in your workplace or neighborhood)

Also, at the risk of repeating a tired cliché, be the change you want to see in the world.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago

where you expect other people to express themselves in a way that you find agreeable.

I'm making no demands on other people here. They can be jerks or virtue-signal as much as they want. I'd just prefer not to see it myself because I find no value in it. I'm not trying to stop them - I'm trying to exclude myself from it.

And this is me trying to be the change. In the ideal case, more and more people would start enabling those filters and all of a sudden the people making noise would see their engagement dropping because more and more of their posts are getting caught in content filters. That would send the signal that if you want your voice to be heard, you actually need to put some effort into it.

[–] nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 months ago
[–] remon@ani.social 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So start blocking people, no fucking AI needed.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yes. Exactly. I've no idea how many people have blocked me for overall silliness, but I imagine it is too damn high.

Or just right, really.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

You've had it for over a decade. Go check out Facebook.

It's maximized for engagement, not your pleasure.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How exactly is Facebook the answer to what I'm asking?

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It is AI powered content filtering which does not rely on keywords.

The title of your post is "I want AI powered content filtering that doesn't just rely on keywords."

More examples of exactly that:

Spotify, Amazon, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok...

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I obviously want to set the filters myself.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

Except if you’re relying on AI, you’ve already given up that level of control and are letting the system decide for you.

In your example, how would you continue to train the model for feedback loops and false positives? That isn’t an AI question, but just a general system design question.

At that point, would you go through a weekly recap of posts to see what may have slipped by? The real issue is going to be detecting sarcasm.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Assuming I’m not a serious person because I’m against using AI is already shortsighted and echo-chamber-y

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago

I quite clearly stated there that disagreeing isn't the issue.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Silly hats only.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 months ago

You don't have a problem with the "noise".

You have a problem with other opinions.

You just call it "noise" because it lets you feel like you have a valid point.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 2 points 3 months ago

Well I want you to not use AI, but we don't always get what we want

[–] leftascenter@jlai.lu 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Isn't that more the point of serious newspapers or at least press agencies than social media feeds?

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The serious people are here already. I just want to silence the rest.

Consuming news is passive - I'd rather engage in discussing the solutions.

[–] leftascenter@jlai.lu 2 points 3 months ago

I get it. I just block the more disagreeable ones. But it's not a total no-noise option.

[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 2 points 3 months ago

It doesn't really matter whether most people like the smell of your farts or not - you're still poisoning the air.

My farts aren't that dangerous 🫣

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 3 months ago

I still feel chatbots are kinda like graphical vs non graphical and I would actually like to see a real free software version integrated into a free software operating system on free/libre hardware. It should be just enough to converse and deal with the operating system basically being trained on that. Then users should be able to add capability. For example a plugin or extension that allows it to query wikipedia or project guetnberg or such.