this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
618 points (97.0% liked)

memes

22030 readers
4461 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 99 points 4 months ago (5 children)

When I first learned about NFTs I figured I was simply too stupid to understand it. There was simply no way it was as dumb as it sounded.

Turns out I was right, it was way, way dumber than it sounded.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 42 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Art is money laundering for the rich.

It all make sense now, doesn't it?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Throw back to Banksy setting a trap in 2006, and springing it 12 years later:

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/watch-14-million-bansky-painting-shred-itself-soon-it-sold-180970486/

"We’ve been Banksy-ed," Alex Branczik, Sotheby’s head of European Contemporary art said in a press conference after the incident. “I’ll be quite honest, we have not experienced this situation in the past, where a painting is spontaneously shredded upon achieving a record for the artist.”

Now that... that's fuckin' art right there.

I love the rest of the article entirely missing the point of Banksy doing that being a surprise.

There, you idiots, frame that image.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

And Love Is In The Bin became more valuable than Girl With Balloon at a subsequent auction, too, by a factor of 18x.

[–] Woolu@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They keep referring to Banksy as "he." We don't know if Banksy is male or female though, correct?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

~~As far as I know that's correct, nobody knows who Bansky actually is.~~

... Is what I was going to say.

What astoundingly serendipitous timing.

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/global-art-banksy/

TL:DR

First posted on the 13th, picked up by other media roughly 6 hours ago, Reuters released a special investigative report, and they believe Bansky is:

... are you sure? ...

Robert Del Naja, the frontman of Massive Attack.

[–] Uebercomplicated@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Small correction:

SpoilerThey actually go on, in that Reuters article, to say it isn't Del Naja, but instead David Jones. The Del Naja bit is kind of a red herring. David Jones, formerly Robin Gunningham, as long suspected. The Wikipedia page has already been updated: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banksy

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm going to go with 'Aha! I did an intentional misdirect!'

... yep. Mhm.

(cough)

derp

[–] Uebercomplicated@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

The article was fun to read, so I fully accept that explanation! ;P

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This fake art for sure, and so much that people start to think monetary value is what is important in art.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There was an experiment where someone set up a high class shoe store in a nice location. They took cheap shoes from discount stores and marked them way up and put them on some nice display racks. People bought them.

Expensive = good...to some people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

So how is he laundering money now with it?

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

Follow the money.

Logan Paul owed somebody $635,000. He paid them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (15 children)

There are lots of legitimate but boring uses of NFTs, just not the kind that make the news like pictures of monkeys.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 8 points 4 months ago

No there isn't. There's lots of ways you can shoehorn NFTs in, but it's always a poor fit. People always try and claim that NFTs will solve some sort of problem that is already solved with existing technology.

There is no problem NFTs can solve that can't also be implemented much more cheaply and effectively with an SQL database from the 90s.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 5 points 4 months ago

I literally emailed a bunch of people doing wildlife conservation and begged them "This is a bubble. Please sell cheesey lion photo NFTs for money. This won't last."

[–] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago

I actually had this whole period where i would be doing something and I'd think to myself "Surely i misunderstand NFTs" then I'd stop what i was doing and check.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

It went the way it usually goes if anything is used exclusively as a subject of speculation. NFTs were meant to represent things, but people inscribed "value" in the representation instead. As if the housing market suddenly exploded the day someone invented writing its owner on a piece of paper.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 33 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I mean, look at the bright side. Someone scammed Logan Paul out of $635,000.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

I wouldn't be surprised if someone at the top of the scam pyramid paid influencers to "buy" NFTs to try and kick off sales.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Now that you mention it, I better put on some welding equipment before looking at that side.

Tap if you don't get itTo avoid eye damage from how extremely bright it is

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He bought it for the headline.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

... or because he needed to sink a $600k investment loss for tax purposes

[–] NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org 4 points 4 months ago

Why not both?

[–] diabetic_porcupine@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Today it’s ON SALE for $150. In reality it’s worthless.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Hahaha remember when they said nfts were going to be valuable because the artists involved were so innovative and cool? Then now the next GPU-selling trend is to rip off artists.

[–] ClownStatue@piefed.social 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Future US Senator, folks! Truly a country of serious people.

ETA: $155 is still comically high.

[–] ThatGuyNamedZeus@feddit.org 10 points 4 months ago

I first heard about NFTs and I thought "wait...so you don't have any control over who sees it or any copyright of it...you're only listed as the owner." then when those pictures of the monkeys with glasses and hats started being sold for millions I thought, "oh so this is a game of hot potato...last person who has it loses"

[–] StormDefence2024@fedia.io 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

how about this take? logan spent 635K on a publicity stunt and 5 years later you muppets are stilll tweeting about it, pretty good return id say

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 5 points 4 months ago

And it had no discernible effect on his life.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Nice. I love seeing rich cunts making poor choices.

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 months ago

At least someone is happy with the USA then.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 months ago

Correction: today it's worthless and in 2021 it was worth nothing.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Is it really worth $155, tho? Did someone actually buy it for that much? Or is it actually worth nothing since nobody is willing to buy it? 🤔

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

NFTs were a vehicle to launder gains from cryptocurrency.

dude probably took the loss as a write off and gained millions in clean liquid cash.

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

The concept of an NFT and the security of purchasing isn't worthless. The fact that people with too much money bid up and purchased any old crap available as a NFT was and always is idiocy. That crap reverting to worthlessness when it wasn't worth anything to start with is reasonable. Some people were able to make a ton of money with that hype. Same as they now are on AI.

load more comments
view more: next ›