this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
259 points (99.6% liked)

News

38235 readers
2098 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link: https://archive.ph/Alo8q

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 144 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Well, I have to commend them on their compassion. I'm not sure I would have done the same; and that's being an epileptic myself...

What stayed with Amundson most, she said, was not the adrenaline of the moment but the realization that came while she was holding the agent’s head in her hands and keeping his airway open.

“I was hit so hard with the fact that this man would not do this for me,” she said.

Her mind went immediately to Renee Good.

[–] CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world 53 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I feel the same way. I got to the part where she unholstered his gun and wondered to myself if I would have that same grace.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's been interesting to see the debate back and fourth over whether this was the right move. The moral 'you should help another human being in need' vs the logical 'don't aid the 'enemy', one less person against you+family'...

It's such a difficult decision; knowing they wouldn't help you if roles were reversed, and may even blame you if he doesn't pull through. With 12h to think sbout it; I still don't know which direction I'd go.

I do have to wonder what story the Administration is going to spin to vilify them anyway...

[–] CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

I mostly was thinking about it practically — it’s a pretty straightforward case to make that a federal agent feared for his life because someone handled their service weapon and that justified the use of lethal force, even by a more law-abiding federal agency during a more liberal administration.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I couldn't. Not just because it's ICE, but because if I didn't manage to save him I know I'd be charged with murder.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Saving him direcrly harms his victims. By saving him you become culpable.

[–] xeekei@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 months ago

Indirectly*

We've lost "literally" already.

[–] Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I mean even from a purely transactional perspective, they did the best thing they could have done in that moment.

If they let him die, a brownshirt might have taken out their frustration on them.

If they shot an ICE agent and ran, they wouldn't have gotten that far and would have gotten the attention of the top Trump ghouls.

Whereas, by saving his life, they got better treatment, convinced a few brownshirts of the value of humanity, and a PR win for the anti-ICE coalition.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

You're not wrong. I'm only saying what my personal thought would have been.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 68 points 5 months ago (19 children)

No. Do not help them. Ever. Let them watch as their fellow brown shirt convulses, until he doesn’t.

They let Good die, even going so far as to bar a medical professional from rendering aid.

The humane thing to do is let them suffer in their final moments. Let’s hope more agents have “medical episodes”.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This was the right move. One agent doesn't make a material difference, letting him die wouldn't have impeded ICE one bit. In the bigger picture, it has more of an impact as a story.

As a story it could have been an agent dying due to a medical emergency that no one could have done anything about.

This action changes it so that the detainees were caring and compassion and competent. By contrast, it exposes the agencies lack of training, falling to recognize the situation and not knowing what to do and letting detainees have control of the firearm. They showed ICE as incompetent and targetting obviously good folk.

On a smaller scale, it spares them. Who knows, maybe this event gives some of the agents involved some pause about how bad they are being.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

No

That sounds like a great storyline, for a cop drama on CBS. One less agent is a net positive, no matter which way you look at it.

Who’s to say that that particular agent doesn’t later blind a protester? Or worse, kill one? Or maybe he just abducts a 5 year, and puts them on a plane to Louisiana?

They just killed another person in Minneapolis. But yeah, let’s patch up the brown shirts.

There is no logical reason to give aid or comfort to the enemy. These aren’t protesters that say mean things that we don’t like. They are a secret police, and their boot’s are on the neck’s of every person who lives in this country.

If you want to start your own club that goes around and makes sure that your oppressors are comfortable in their crusade against liberty, go right on ahead.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 5 months ago

They don't acknowledge the humanity of others, so why should they expect those without humanity to show any in return?

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 5 months ago (1 children)

All ICE agents are pure evil and deserve death. There are no good ICE agents. Period. Feel free to disagree with me, but you'll never change my mind.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 14 points 5 months ago

No, you're 100% correct.

[–] Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone 40 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That is horrible situation to placed in. Helping save someone who is actively trying to ruin your life and hurt you. They did the right thing, but there must be little satisfaction in helping these oppressors.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 5 months ago (3 children)

They didn’t do the right thing though. We are not in a peacetime situation where we are extending olive branches to the terrorists, in hopes of showing them our humanity. They. Do. Not. Care.

The only good fascist is the one with blue lips.

[–] TWeaK@lemmy.today 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Sure. But we aren't them. We do care. We have humanity.

Let's not sacrifice that and lower ourselves to their level.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 5 months ago (5 children)

No. This is why democrats fail. They are not willing to do what needs to be done, to say what needs to be said, for fear of their farts not smelling like roses.

Take your high road, write a letter, and slam the nazi’s in a clever tweet.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] lemmyseikai@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Like... I get it... But at the same time the moment we give up our humanity we are not better than they are.

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] lemmyseikai@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (3 children)

What high road?

I am talking about people having a human moment during a medical emergency.

Maybe you could watch someone die in front of you, but I couldn't.

I could kill someone if I needed to but there is a difference in defending yourself when you are in mortal danger and letting someone die.

If we become the monsters they think we are, then we won't fix society, we will guarantee the schizm poisons the next generation when the battle is over.

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

ice is an enemy to which we can give no quarter. they have declared that they can came into our houses, any one of us, with no warrant, no proceedure, nothing but what they decide based on a list of criteria they will not make public, and kidnap us.

fuck ice. they are destroying families and communities, they are using children as ‘bait’ .

they cannot be saved.

let them bleed out.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 5 months ago (5 children)

They have proven time and time again that they don’t care about humanity. They don’t care about “doing what’s right”. There is no scorecard here. We’re to the point where they are maiming and murdering in the streets.

Just think for one second here, all of the terrible videos we’ve seen are a snowflake on top of the iceberg that is their daily crimes and abuses.

If you see an injured pig, be sure to piss on it before you pass it by.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 31 points 5 months ago

Amundson, a kindergarten teacher who has received CPR and first-aid training through school emergency planning, moved without hesitation once the cuffs came off.

Good to hear we're still only arresting the violent criminals and rapists. /s

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 30 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think I would also help the enemy, but I don't blame anyone if they won't.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago

It's fine to provide first aid to enemy combatants as long as they are imprisoned until the war is over.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 29 points 5 months ago

Nah, I'd let him twitch. That's what he'd do, except he'd laugh, too.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 27 points 5 months ago (1 children)

She Helped an ICE Agent? TERRORIST!

-Kristi Noem!

"We believe the women used a combination of siren song and/or witchcraft to induce the seizure"

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 24 points 5 months ago

Shoulda let the bastard die...

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You should know that you are in no way obliged to render aid to anyone ever.

[–] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Triumph@fedia.io 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

My United States is showing. Even then, I just learned that Louisiana has such a law.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jonesey71@lemmus.org 16 points 5 months ago

I would definitely not have done that.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 15 points 5 months ago

It's the right thing to do, but I don't think God appreciates his work being shit on like that

[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

"I did what I did because all life is sacred. But when the object of your actions does not share that belief.. I fear I have served the present by sacrificing the future." -Lennier, Babylon 5

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Women like this are the reason why I still have faith in humanity. They still have the humanity that Ice has lost long ago

One wonders what that ice member is going tondo once he leaves the hospital. Will he see the error of his way? Will he visit the women he arrested and who then saved his life? Will he continue working for the SS?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

They'll probably charge them with assault.

load more comments
view more: next ›