That bad, huh?
this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)
Australian Politics
1874 readers
8 users here now
A place to discuss Australia Politics.
Rules
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.
Recommended and Related Communities
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
- Australia (general)
- Australian News
- World News (from an Australian Perspective)
- Aussie Environment
- Ask an Australian
- AusFinance
- Pictures
- AusLegal
- Aussie Frugal Living
- Cars (Australia)
- Coffee
- Chat
- Aussie Zone Meta
- bapcsalesaustralia
- Food Australia
Plus other communities for sport and major cities.
https://aussie.zone/communities
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
As an Aussie, I'm grateful for everyday that the LNP is not back in government. Labor might be inadequate and sometimes infuriating, but they're not outright evil bastards like the opposition.
Luckily, just like with Obama II, people can’t see further than one term and don’t realise we should have been using the first term and all of this term to get rid of the 2 party system.
Translation: Australia isn’t fucked right now, just delayed in getting fucked.
With outright majorities in the upper house as common as hens teeth, its pretty inarguable that we have something more complex than a two party system.
We do, but the lower house is not elected proportionally (as the Senate is), resulting in the two major parties having a disproportionate share of the vote.
We don't HAVE a two party system
For something to be defamatory it has to:
a) Reduce the public's perception of him (which is laughable, the public's perception of him is "monster")
b) Be untrue (doubt it)
I think he meant derogatory.
And even that's of questionable accuracy, as it's about being shown an inappropriate amount of respect.
I think he meant derogatory.
He definitely meant defamatory, since he apparently tacitly threatened suing the Liberal Party. But whether it's true or essentially a SLAPP threat is unclear.
It's certainly possible that he believes the report contained factually incorrect non-opinion claims about him. I can't see that being likely though. I guess the fact that they didn't give him the opportunity for a right-of-reply in the report can't have helped. That would have given him an opportunity to address any potential issues before it got to this point. It really seems like a monumental fuck-up on their part not to have contacted him for right-of-reply.
Almost reads like a satirical headline lol
I'm laughing even harder because it's NOT a Betoota article!
If he tries to block it, it will leak, and that'll make them look even worse again
A healthy and broadly educated population, which experiences safety and security, is incompatible with, and toxic to, conservative and authoritarian ideologies.
The fact that there is an actual “He is not a monster” headline. Quoting his own wife. Makes me wonder what’s in the report that he thinks a defamation proceeding would succeed.