this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
9 points (84.6% liked)

Lefty Memes

7022 readers
103 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of "ML" (read: Dengist) influence. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, discussion and agitprop/stuff that's better fit for a poster than a meme go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme. Please post agitprop here)


0.5 [Provisional Rule] Use alt text or image descriptions to allow greater accessibility


(Please take a look at our wiki page for the guidelines on how to actually write alternative text!)

We require alternative text (from now referred to as "alt text") to be added to all posts/comments containing media, such as images, animated GIFs, videos, audio files, and custom emojis.
EDIT: For files you share in the comments, a simple summary should be enough if they’re too complex.

We are committed to social equity and to reducing barriers of entry, including (digital) communication and culture. It takes each of us only a few moments to make a whole world of content (more) accessible to a bunch of folks.

When alt text is absent, a reminder will be issued. If you don't add the missing alt text within 48 hours, the post will be removed. No hard feelings.


0.5.1 Style tip about abbreviations and short forms


When writing stuff like "lol" and "iirc", it's a good idea to try and replace those with their all caps counterpart

  • ofc => OFC
  • af = AF
  • ok => OK
  • lol => LOL
  • bc => BC
  • bs => BS
  • iirc => IIRC
  • cia => CIA
  • nato => Nato (you don't spell it when talking, right?)
  • usa => USA
  • prc => PRC
  • etc.

Why? Because otherwise (AFAIK), screen readers will try to read them out as actually words instead of spelling them


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" (read: Dengists) (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't irrationally idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://50501.chat/post/177705


Originally Posted By u/transcendent167 At 2025-05-02 10:43:07 AM | Source


top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (17 children)

We don't need AI rubbish for this, someone already made this one:

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Oops, I guess I was a little too spicy. I agree, we don’t need AI, and using the tools of billionaires instead of real art by human artists is at best misguided and at worst actively harming the people you purportedly want to help.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (27 children)

We're friendly to AI art on this instance. If you don't like that, the door is over there.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (7 children)

You can be friendly to it, but that doesn't mean you need to like everything. People are friendly to traditional art, doesn't mean they have to like every single piece of traditional art. People can be into food, but they don't need to like every single cuisine.

Surely you wouldn't take the position every single thing on here needs to be GenAI? So in the middle is where we find ourselves.

So be discerning, you owe yourself that at least.

Back to the topic:

This piece is just a bit rubbish and kinda unmemorable. The one I linked did a better job of conveying the same message in a more memorable way IMO, and it seems that opinion is shared by other users of your instance.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

so you're saying you're friendly towards some AI art, right?

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Yeah if it's actually got artistic merit or is actually interesting in some way sure, life isn't black & white, so I won't be either. Cards on the table, I've got some issues with how some of the big models have been trained and deployed, but no real issue with the technology itself.

The AI art will be at most as good as the effort going into it, and honestly it's pretty clear that 90% of the stuff you see posted around at the moment barely had 30 mins spent on the idea.

I can guarantee I'm not gonna like much of any traditional art where it's clearly low effort and derivative either. The best art does something new and interesting

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago

But how else will I churn out Content for my internet activism? 🥺 Activism is when you post new Content, right?

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

This is a billion times better than the Ai slop.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

there's one African immigrant that should be blamed.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

No war but class war. All struggle is class struggle. Everything else is FUD and obfuscation.

[–] Squorlple@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

A mod of !fediverse_vs_disinfo@lemmy.dbzer0.com is posting AI slopaganda

[–] masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

That's not actually true at all.

They pour all this contrived hatred on poor immigrants because immigrant labour is the cheapest - and most expendable - labour around. And by assigning blame onto poor immigrants they manufacture the necessary consent to sicc more and more state violence onto poor immigrants in order to keep this source of labour as cheap - and thoroughly terrorised - as possible.

That's why. It's so damn basic you can find all of it in the second book of the Old Testament.

[–] Commiunism@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

To be incredibly pedantic (and I love being pedantic), this means that billionaires specifically are the problem, right?

What about medium/large business owners who are far from being billionaires, or small business owners who are trying to get their business off the ground, are they not also problematic given how they still exploit workers to the same degree (or even to a larger degree like small businesses, given how they enjoy a lot of discriminatory legal exemptions worldwide and have to cut labour costs in order to compete better) and are more likely than not to support reactionary rhetoric that divides the working classes further due to their class position?

If only there was a word to encompass all of them

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Capitalism? Sure billionaires aren't the only problem, but in a plutocracy they are a good place to start.

[–] confusedpuppy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like calling people by their actions instead of any label. In this situation I would call them Wealth Hoarders. I think that covers the many labels of the rich on varying scales of wealth ownership without singling out any specific group.

I find the over use of labels to be a tool for distraction. It's easy to argue the definition of a label and ignore the actions that are actually happening. Describing a person's action leaves less room for debate and returns the focus back on shitty, unacceptable and unwanted behaviour.

As a nice bonus, describing shitty peoples actions and behaviours to them makes them visibly uncomfortable. At least from my experiences.

[–] Commiunism@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"Wealth Hoarder" isn't the best term, given how it could also include decently affluent working class people who have a decent amount of savings. They technically hoard wealth for themselves albeit to a lesser extent, but are these people problematic/part of the problem?

Also, it was a rhetorical question, the answer is bourgeoisie (or capitalists if you don't want to use 19th century English). It's definition literally is the employers and people who own and run companies/factories, and rentiers who live off of rent (so landlords). Instead of describing an action, it does something better and describes their material position, what they have.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I will continue to undiscriminatingly block accounts posting AI slop

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago
[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Love that reddit watermark.

Be best OP

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago

Eh that's all on the mirror comm it's cross posted from

[–] cornshark@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why are some of the bills labeled 0?

Because it's AI slop

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rusty@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

AI slop with reddit watermark. Who the fuck upvotes this shit?

[–] seeigel@feddit.org 0 points 1 year ago

What if they also bring immigrants so that there are immigrants to blame?

Should we remember that, too?

[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

We can start by not using their slop generators.

load more comments
view more: next ›