this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Anarchism and Social Ecology

3287 readers
1 users here now

!anarchism@slrpnk.net

A community about anarchy. anarchism, social ecology, and communalism for SLRPNK! Solarpunk anarchists unite!

Feel free to ask questions here. We aspire to make this space a safe space. SLRPNK.net's basic rules apply here, but generally don't be a dick and don't be an authoritarian.

Anarchism

Anarchism is a social and political theory and practice that works for a free society without domination and hierarchy.

Social Ecology

Social Ecology, developed from green anarchism, is the idea that our ecological problems have their ultimate roots in our social problems. This is because the domination of nature and our ecology by humanity has its ultimate roots in the domination humanity by humans. Therefore, the solutions to our ecological problems are found by addressing our social and ecological problems simultaneously.

Libraries

Audiobooks

Quotes

Poetry and imagination must be integrated with science and technology, for we have evolved beyond an innocence that can be nourished exclusively by myths and dreams.

~ Murray Bookchin, The Ecology of Freedom

People want to treat ‘we’ll figure it out by working to get there’ as some sort of rhetorical evasion instead of being a fundamental expression of trust in the power of conscious collective effort.

~Anonymous, but quoted by Mariame Kaba, We Do This 'Til We Free Us

The end justifies the means. But what if there never is an end? All we have is means.

~Ursula K. Le Guin, The Lathe of Heaven

The assumption that what currently exists must necessarily exist is the acid that corrodes all visionary thinking.

~Murray Bookchin, "A Politics for the Twenty-First Century"

There can be no separation of the revolutionary process from the revolutionary goal. A society based on self-administration must be achieved by means of self-administration.

~Murray Bookchin, Post Scarcity Anarchism

In modern times humans have become a wolf not only to humans, but to all nature.

~Abdullah Öcalan

The ecological question is fundamentally solved as the system is repressed and a socialist social system develops. That does not mean you cannot do something for the environment right away. On the contrary, it is necessary to combine the fight for the environment with the struggle for a general social revolution...

~Abdullah Öcalan

Social ecology advances a message that calls not only for a society free of hierarchy and hierarchical sensibilities, but for an ethics that places humanity in the natural world as an agent for rendering evolution social and natural fully self-conscious.

~ Murray Bookchin

Network

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been part of the online left for a while now, part of slrpnk about 2 months, and if there's one recurring experience that's both exhausting and revealing, it's trying to have good-faith discussions with self-identified Marxist-Leninists, the kind often referred to as "tankies." I use that term here not as a lazy insult nor to dehumanize, but to describe a particular kind of online personality: the ones who dogmatically defend Marx, Lenin, Stalin, and every so-called "existing socialist state" past or present, without room for nuance, critique, or even basic empathy. Not all Marxist-Leninists are like this. But these people, these tankies, show up in every thread, every debate, every conversation about liberation, and somehow it always turns into a predictable mess.

It usually goes like this: I make a statement that critiques authoritarianism or centralized power, and suddenly I'm being accused of parroting CIA talking points, being a liberal in disguise, or not being a "real leftist." One time, I said "Totalitarianism kills" — a simple, arguably uncontroversial point. What followed was a barrage of replies claiming that the term was invented by Nazis, that Hannah Arendt (who apparently popularized it, I looked it up and it turns out she didn't) was an anti-semite, and that even using the word is inherently reactionary. When I clarified that I was speaking broadly about state violence and authoritarian mechanisms, the same people just doubled down, twisting my words, inventing claims I never made, and eventually accusing me of being some kind of crypto-fascist. This wasn’t a one-off, it happens constantly.

If you've spent any time in these spaces, you know what I'm talking about. The conversations never stays on topic. It always loops back to defending state socialism, reciting quotes from Lenin, minimizing atrocities as "bourgeois propaganda" and dragging anarchism as naive or counter-revolutionary. It's like they’re playing from a script.

I’ve spent a lot of time trying to understand why these interactions feel so uniquely frustrating. And over time, I’ve started noticing recurring patterns in the kind of people who show up this way. Again, a disclaimer here: not everyone who defends Marx or Lenin online falls into these patterns. There are thoughtful, sincere, and principled MLs who engage in real, grounded discussions. But then there are these other types:

  1. The Theory Maximalist

This person treats political theory like scripture. They’ve read the texts (probably a lot of them) and they approach every conversation like a chance to prove their mastery. Everything becomes about citations, dialectics, and abstract arguments. When faced with real-world contradictions, their default move is to bury it under more theory. They mistake being well-read for being politically mature, and often completely miss the human, relational side of radical politics.

  1. The Identity Leftist

For this person, being a leftist isn’t about organizing or material change. It’s an identity. They call themselves a Marxist-Leninist the way someone else might call themselves a punk or a metalhead. Defending state socialism becomes a cultural performance. They’re less interested in the complexity of history than in being on the “correct side” of whatever aesthetic battle they’re fighting. Anarchists, to them, represent softness or chaos, and that’s a threat to the image they’ve built for themselves.

  1. The Terminally Online Subculturalist

This one lives in forums, Discords, or other niche Internet circles. Their entire political world is digital. They've likely never been to a union meeting, a mutual aid drive, or a community organizing session. All their knowledge of struggle is mediated through memes and screenshots. They treat ideology like a fandom and conflict like sport. They love the drama, the takedowns, the purity contests. The actual work of liberation? Irrelevant.

  1. The Alienated Intellectual

This person is often very smart, often very isolated, and clings to ideology as a way of making sense of the world. They’re drawn to strict political systems because it gives them order and meaning in a chaotic life. And while they might not be malicious, they often struggle to engage with disagreement without feeling personally attacked. For them, criticism of Marxism-Leninism can feel like an existential threat, because it destabilizes the fragile structure they’ve built to cope with life.

These types don’t describe everyone, and they’re not meant to be a diagnosis or a dismissal. They're patterns I’ve noticed. Ways that a political identity can become rigid, defensive, and disconnected from real-world struggle.

And here’s the thing that’s always struck me as particularly ironic: Let's face it, a lot of these people would absolutely hate to be part of real socialist organizing. Because the kind of organizing that builds power, the kind that helps people survive, defend themselves, and grow; it's messy, emotionally challenging, and full of conflict. It requires flexibility, listening, and compromise. It doesn’t work if everyone’s just quoting dead guys and calling each other traitors. Anarchist or not, actual socialist practice is grounded in real life, not in endless internet warfare.

That’s why this whole cycle feels so tragic. Because behind all the posturing, the purity tests, and the ideological gatekeeping, there’s a legit reason these people ended up here. Of all the ideologies in the world, they chose communism. Why? Probably because they hurt. Because they saw the ugliness of capitalism and wanted something better. Because, at some point, they were moved by the idea that we could live without exploitation.

And somewhere along the way, that desire got calcified into a set of talking points. It got buried under defensiveness and online clout games. The pain turned inward, and now they lash out at anyone who doesn’t match their script. That’s not an excuse. But it is something to hold with empathy.

I don’t write this to mock anyone. I write it because I want us to do better, recognize our differences and hopefully come to a fair conclusion. And Idk, I still believe we can. Ape together strong 💖

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] honeynut@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

those miserable fucks are mocking this thread https://hexbear.net/post/4671954?sort=Top

keep an eye out for brigaders (I see at almost a dozen sketchy comments here already) and report anyone you even get a whiff of being tankie alt. Even mild tankie apologetics or sympathy shouldn't be tolerated or else they start thinking this is a safe space for them.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

LMAO, my meme I made a bit back is ever relevant

"ThEy jUsT DonT wAnT To reAD [Theory]"

[–] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago

As described by OOP, they just take parts out of context and think they somehow "won" the debate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] banan67@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago

Yea, I skimmed through the comments. Yikes. Really just proves my point that they take these criticisms like a shot to the chest.

[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago

Well written and sober. A stark contrast to what I typically read coming from the degenerate minds of common Tankies and Tea Party MAGA (who are both cut from the same rotted out cloth).

If what you read angered you, go touch some fucking grass, I don't care about the opinions from dipshit Tankies or MAGA

[–] Alpha71@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Both sides need to calm down.

[–] jaxxed@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

I am relieved to read this.

I can't strictly identify with your beliefs, but the "this country versus that country" conversations are driving me nuts; as though any government is ideal, or free from corruption.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I have noticed how they often use identical tactics to the Alt-Right movement in the USA, as described masterfully in Innuendo Studios' The Alt Right Playbook. As such, I've started thinking of tankies as a kind of Alt-Left, where facts matter little to none and instead feelings are supreme - though exclusively theirs, while yours count for little (although ironically not none, bc cruelty is the point).

And since algorithms that foster "engagement" tend to make this argumentation style more prevalent, it is becoming more prominent all over the world.

Sadly, it's fairly prominent in Lemmy as well, though tbf, we who came here from Reddit joined their space, not the other way around. This is why supporting independent development of software such as PieFed and Mbin is so crucial, bc otherwise authoritarianism seeps into everything. E.g. Lemmy has a modlog but no modmail, no notification sent to inform the recipient of a moderation action, no ability to enquire or dispute it even if you somehow find out about it - bc the modlog simply says it was done by a "mod" - and therefore Lemmy is actually somehow more authoritian than Reddit itself was!?!?!?!? (Caveat: admins have near total freedom, at the cost of potentially great efforts required to modify the codebase, and mods have elevated privileges as well, but for the end user... it is much the same, at least with regard to a specific community - they can take what it offers, or else leave).

What makes the Threadiverse fantastic and worth visiting is its userbase. Highly ironically then, what makes the Threadiverse toxic AF is its userbase. 🙃 (So many people over on r/RedditAlternatives saying how they could not tolerate it...) Thus, blocking it is then, with people who use such bad faith arguments chief among my own prioritization for such. (Btw it's not really possible to fully block all users from a specific instance on Lemmy - that feature would have far better been named as a "community mute" imho - unless you use the Sync or Connect app, switch to PieFed, or delve into making Ublock filters or creating your own instance to defederate them, none of them particularly easy to do, for a mainstream non-technical normie, who might otherwise be a fantastic content creator if the Threadiverse hadn't decided to run them off with its high level of toxicity.)

[–] millie@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Honestly, a good portion of them probably are the alt right. For some reason leftists on Lemmy have been taken in by this idea that everyone they talk to who purports to be a leftist must be taken at their word in good faith, even if everything they say literally sounds like a right-wing parody of leftism.

The fact that this vulnerability exists necessitates that we assume it's being used.

Why did the economist walk straight past a $1000 bill sitting in the middle of the sidewalk? Because if it had been there someone would have already picked it up.

It would be absolutely absurd to assume that no conservatives are cosplaying as leftists spouting exactly the stuff they accuse leftists of spouting and doing everything they can to disrupt any form of leftist solidarity. It's a $1000 bill sitting in the middle of the sidewalk that we can literally watch them picking up if we're not too willfully naive to acknowledge that it's happening.

Would you leave a secure server open with the password to the root account literally on the front page? No? Then why is anyone leaving this vulnerability wide open and pretending it isn't?

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 0 points 1 year ago

I think you just described the genesis of Hexbear:-D.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zirconium@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've had a tankie tell me alt right playbook is Nazi propaganda before

[–] kuato@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Links or it didn’t happen.

[–] Zirconium@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah if you can recover my comment and its replies. https://sh.itjust.works/comment/2866047 And if you go to my shit just works account forgive my immaturity and bad arguments, I've grown a lot since then

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow. That’s either some serious head-up-the-ass or a depressing lack of listening comprehension.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 0 points 1 year ago

"Everything the other side does is wrong, while my own side is incapable of doing wrong." While somehow at the same time, "bOtH sIdEs SaMe". It sounds tribal to me... yet what do I know 🤔.

[–] Diva@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

On the alt-right playbook, at the end of the day its mostly an analysis of fascism as an analysis of rhetoric. I would argue that I've see most of these strategies used by people of every single tendency. I haven't caught up since they returned from hiatus, but ironically the way they're presented would be something I would point to as an example of #1, announcing rhetorical devices authoritatively like you're reading from scripture or something.

If anything since the first run of alt-right playbook the alt right has just won and become the right.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been having a decent time here. sure there is an asshole here and there but that's just GIFT for ya. the threadiverse feels like reddit back when it didn't suck

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The users here are definitely a higher quality than Reddit.

Or much lower, depending on where you go. Your instance is defederated from ~95% of the worst of the bad faith tankie posts though, so your recent experience is a success story that blocking such works to help people enjoy themselves here!

In contrast, I almost left the Threadiverse myself, after being trolled in both Hexbear.net and lemmygrad.ml (again, both of which slrpnk.net is defederated from) by making innocuous comments (I thought) yet receiving spam replies for WEEKS and WEEKS afterwards. Tbf that is kinda the entire purpose of ChapoTrapHouse@hexbear.net - to dunk on lib takes (or even ones not leftist enough) - but a new person (me!) wouldn't know that by arriving at a random post by browsing All, which doesn't show the sidebar text anywhere before you have a chance to reply in a comment. I would rather not use social media entirely than have to constantly put up with such.

So instead I switched instances, getting rid of lemmygrad.ml, then petitioned the new one to defederate from Hexbear.net, which was successful, then switched to PieFed which allows me to block all users from any instance I choose without requiring admin support, and thereby blocked lemmy.ml. I managed to get rid of the entire Big Three in my feed! And yes it does make experiencing the Threadiverse much better 😊.

[–] Diva@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I was curious so I checked the hexbear modlog, you posted a weird comment and people posted a lot of "wtf" replies, the mod message for removing your comment was jesse-wtf

I'm honestly not sure what you're referencing, but most of the responses here were just people making fun of you for blaming Putin for funding Israel?

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I checked, guys. OP doesn't have .ml next to his name.

Sadly, this means we can't just call him out and we have to actually read the post this time.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I read it, it's very much just going into more detail on what we've all been saying about tankies this whole time. In fact while reading it a few... infamous ... .ml tankie users popped in my head that fit the description I was reading perfectly LMAO

[–] _bac@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have never seen any discussion like you are describing. However I see a post complaining of tankies every day.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're on .world, you're isolated from the worst of the Tankie Triad (Hexbear and Lemmygrad), .ml admins in an effort to avoid larger calls for defederation like with hex and grad, try to do things far more subtlety through mod action or in action (e.g. removing comments and posts critical of their favored Authoritarian regimes but allowing known propaganda outlets from those Regimes to fester and spread)

Just a few days ago, for example, a users comment was removed and then banned for calling the USSR a Dictatorship and North Korea a monarchy using one of 2 "catch-all" instance rules they use to justify the removal of any speech they don't like (Rule 1 is "officially" no bigotry and Rule 2 is "officially" Be respectful)

and there's much much much more on !meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works documented

The posts "complaining" about the tankies are mostly from users like slrpunk or .ee that don't defederate from the Triad and thus are exposed to it far more often

[–] sunflowercowboy@feddit.org 0 points 1 year ago

I told people to vote to at least halt the hate machine. They involved gazan lives and said I was to blame.

I still don't understand how, I cannot vote, and have nothing but time in this fragmentary calmness we feel. I just wanted them to appreciate their days at least.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

self-identified Marxist-Leninists, the kind often referred to as “tankies.”

Tankie is a term that NAFO bodysnatcher nazi US empire lovers use to criticize those who oppose US empire's geopolitical extortion. Naziism is simply superior to Russia's self defense needs, or China's humanist abundance strategy. There is no need to support Marxism to be called a tankie. US puppet democracy simply must be considered supreme, and no matter how distant the human rights abuses (that far pale in comparison to even current US evil) of those resisting US evil, you are a tankie for not favouring US naziism and genocide.

tankie is simply a brainwashing insult meant to uphold the illusory "good vs evil historical narrative the audience learned in grade school from pledge of allegiance"

Identity Leftist

It is common in anarchist circles for feminist/queer supremacists, identity pride, to view anarchism as a platform to launch a new fascist order where their identity values rule supreme. The evil of religion/church is identity pride that replaces "thou shalt not kill" principles. Where Marxism is labour identity supremacism, that too becomes a basis for fascism.

Regardless of Citizen's united, money has always been speech. So, corporatist/oligarchist/capitalist supremacy can spend on divisivness to grant them supremacism. Zionism has always been the Empire's friend, but it was ultimate alliance point for oligarchy in last election.

Freedom dividends/UBI is far more important than democracy. It permits fair/fairer markets, where labour is not priced based on the desperation level of labour, and returns on capital reflects the opportunity for competition. UBI is less about wealth redistribution as it is power redistribution. Less of a master, is far more achievable than a vacuum opportunity for new masters.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No, "Tankie" has a clear definition and is mostly used correctly around here

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tankie

Tankie is a pejorative label generally applied to authoritarian communists, especially those who support or defend acts of repression by such regimes, their allies, or deny the occurrence of the events thereof.

And that is demonstrated by, known hardcore tankies, .ml admins through censorship and bans of those critical of their favored Authoritarian regimes:

https://lemmy.world/post/28480760

https://lemmy.world/post/28481615

https://lemmy.world/post/28482147

https://lemmy.world/post/28480936

https://lemmy.world/post/28482273

https://lemmy.world/post/28481272

https://lemmy.world/post/28481064

https://lemmy.world/post/27674360

https://lemmy.world/post/27674117

https://lemmy.world/post/27673934

https://lemmy.world/post/27673724

https://lemmy.world/post/27577337

https://lemmy.world/post/27378634

https://lemmy.world/post/27346630

https://lemmy.world/post/27341283

https://lemmy.world/post/27288224

https://lemmy.world/post/27156418

https://lemmy.world/post/27054157

https://lemmy.world/post/27008261

To allowing altered headlines and permitting known propaganda outlets:

https://lemmy.world/post/28275465

https://lemmy.world/post/27428838

https://lemmy.world/post/27416097

https://lemmy.world/post/27314050

https://lemmy.world/post/27288953

That spew Russian talking points like Ukraines invasion just being a "negotiating tactic" https://lemmy.world/post/27012640

To general hostility to other instances who haven't "seen the way" yet https://lemmy.world/post/27426510

To their open declaration of support for Russia (direct from dessalines) https://lemmy.world/post/27352415

To even "concentration camps were just reeducation camps and weren't that bad" https://lemmy.world/post/26985447

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The literal definition of Tankie is supporting USSR tanks being sent for regime change/suppression of eastern Europe post war. Russia happened to peacefully give liberation to all of these countries, and to all of USSR. That US/NATO has continued its demonic diminishment of Russia after this point, including nazi coups under fake liberal colour revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine, does not make anyone opposed to the stupidity and demonism of empire overreach, a tankie. You supporting demonic nazis for diminishment of others (and Ukrainian population including nazis) is the problem, and baseless accusation of calling humans tankies or Putin contractors, your path to ensuring the stupid support your evil.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

The literal definition of Tankie is supporting USSR tanks being sent for regime change/suppression of eastern Europe post war.

Dude, language is constantly changing, word definitions change and words can have multiple definitions. We all know what the historical definition is, but it does not have bearing on the current modern day definition. "Gay" used to mean happy, and it still technically is but it's now a secondary historical definition in the modern day. Same with Tankie.

That US/NATO has continued its demonic diminishment of Russia after this point, including nazi coups under fake liberal colour revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine, does not make anyone opposed to the stupidity and demonism of empire overreach. You supporting demonic nazis for diminishment of others (and Ukrainian population including nazis) is the problem

LMAO yes yes poor poor Russia I'm sure Putler is actually a really nice good guy just trying to fight against the evils of the world!!!!

baseless accusation of calling humans tankies

Oh but lobbing "shitlib/libtard" or "liberals" as "dehumanizing pejoratives" is ok?

[–] technohippie@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Peaceful liberation, you have to be kidding.

I'd love you to talk with my still alive 90 years old Polish grandma who happened to directly experience all the bullshit when Stalin and Hitler were best friends forever and later the 50 years of post war "liberation" of Poland by the Soviets. I can ask her questions on your behalf if you want. Direct experience no propaganda books.

It's crazy how their propaganda extended so much brain rot.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You should no shit do like a mini video interview with her going over all the BS Tankie USSR talking points

[–] technohippie@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's actually a good idea. Well I think tankies are beyond reparation, they'll confidently think that my grandma is being paid by the CIA or something similar.. But just for having recorded her experience of how it was living under the USSR dictatorship could be worth.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

they'll confidently think that my grandma is being paid by the CIA or something similar

Maybe but it'd be good to counter their arguments to others who are watching/reading when they bring up their "sources" I for one would link back to it constantly lol

But just for having recorded her experience of how it was living under the USSR dictatorship could be worth.

This was mainly my reasoning, beyond having something to shove in the tankies face, just having that recorded bit of history from someone who lived it would be invaluable to both the general public and for personal sentimental reasons for yourself

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] an_angerous_engineer@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

I appreciate that someone is trying to have a real conversation about this kind of thing. I don't think leftists have enough conversations where they're acknowledging the actual sources of conflict within their ranks.

I have a little experience with moderation (including in leftist spaces), and one of the things that I've found to be really helpful in understanding these sorts of problems is actually the modern theory of narcissism. A lot has been learned in the last decade about what happens when a person's empathy is physiologically impaired, and understanding this personality pattern is immensely helpful in navigating interpersonal conflicts at all scales. Tankies as you describe them are actually one of the more clear-cut cases of a narcissistic subculture within the left. The constant abuse of language, bad-faith argumentation, hypersensitivity to ideological or personal criticism of any kind, the dismissal of any legitimate concerns or established facts that would threaten their apparent worldview, etc... This is all classic narcissistic argumentation.

And somewhere along the way, that desire got calcified into a set of talking points. It got buried under defensiveness and online clout games. The pain turned inward, and now they lash out at anyone who doesn’t match their script. That’s not an excuse. But it is something to hold with empathy.

Unfortunately, this narrative is simply wrong. One of the things that you really have to understand about these sorts of people is that the cause and effect between their arguments and their beliefs is reversed from what you would expect. They do not believe things because they buy the arguments that they were given. They hold beliefs abut what is and is not acceptable because of how they want to be allowed to behave and what rights and privileges they feel they deserve, and then they seek out a narrative/ideology that allows them to justify all of that. We're not dealing with people who are making decisions based on any sort of rational process. We're dealing with people who are trying to find palatable justifications for them getting whatever it is that they want (power, status, accolades, etc...). The lack of empathy comes first!

The reason that some of these people find themselves in the left is that they can often misconstrue arguments in favor of broad freedom for all into justifications for a system of 'governance' where there is no such thing as personal accountability (at least for them, personally). This is where you get your anarcho-nihilists who don't want any sort of rule-enforcement structures at all, or anarcho-capitalists who believe that rules should be enforced by the people who can pay the private militias to enforce them (and they, of course, would be the sort of people who could afford such a service). Tankies lean on their disordered trait of 'living in their future success' more than most - believing that they will somehow rise to the top (or somewhere near it) of whatever authoritarian regime they're advocating for, essentially escaping any sort of accountability and holding absolute power, all while appealing to the desire for liberation from the disenfranchised.

If you don't believe me, then here's an experiment for you. Try to have a conversation about accountability with anyone who is acting suspect like this. Ask them about what sorts of systems of accountability they would like to see in a society, and ask them about where they see themselves fitting into that system. Ask them how they think that system should respond to some of their sketchier behaviors. Accountability is the #1 enemy of any narcissist. The responses you'll get will be absolutely insane.

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.vg 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Tankies are conservatives acting on a social level instead of an economic level (from what you describe). This makes more sense if you think of military hierarchies and advancement in them.

[–] banan67@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is very insightful. I'm really interested, are there any books or otherwise sources that helped you draw this conclusion? It makes a whole lot of sense, I guess I was kind of ignoring that possibility.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] squirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago

Of all the ideologies in the world, they chose communism. Why? Probably because they hurt. Because they saw the ugliness of capitalism and wanted something better. Because, at some point, they were moved by the idea that we could live without exploitation. [...] The pain turned inward, and now they lash out at anyone who doesn’t match their script. That’s not an excuse. But it is something to hold with empathy.

I wish I could easily subscribe to your call for empathy. The reason why I can't is because I have seen so many tankies deny the pain of others. It's not just the historical revisionism and the denial of Stalinist atrocities, but denying that people in the here and now are suffering like they do. Often this was tied to them insisting that they had every right to abuse others, because they themselves were suffering from capitalism. They completely failed to acknowledge that everyone around them was suffering under the very same conditions.

And there is the crux of the issue: One unspoken, implicit tenet of their beliefs is the denying others the same humanity they claim to uphold and represent. They demand to be accepted and their behavior to be tolerated, but will not grant the same basic rights to others.
The same notion allows them to deny the humanity of victims of Stalinist and Maoist terror.

And that's why I have a hard time to show them empathy, because I know they will not show the same empathy towards me.

[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Myself, I've seen a bit of similar stuff.

Since arriving on Lemmy, I've sometimes stumbled on instances where ideological purity is enforced with an iron fist, and dozens of communities have the same overlapping moderators (no point in appealing any decision).

In such places, I've sometimes ended up arguing - usually describing history from the viewpoint that Wikipedia takes, from the viewpoint which has the benefit of supporting evidence. In those few places, this has been deemed "reactionary" and I've been banned a few times.

Upon examining the moderation logs of the threads where I got banned, I've found other peculiarities, like people getting banned for voting the wrong way.

I've never been too sure about what the appropriate response is, but my response has been reminding the admin of a local Lemmy instance (I have accounts on multiple instances) that federating with strange places has adverse consequences.

If one federates with an authoritarian place where censorship occurs strongly, everyone will see the counterfactual narratives pushed there, but nobody can argue, since they'll get banned in those communities super fast. That's not a balanced exchange of views and I've come to dislike that.

[–] the_abecedarian@piefed.social 0 points 1 year ago

Some people simply like to be contrarian and troll online communities, including leftist ones. Or they're doing it out of anger or despair or low self esteem (or they're paid to by a government lol). Good modding, that has the tools, time, and numbers to do a good job, may be an answer to that side of it.

Otherwise, I think being involved with local irl groups doing things and then posting report backs is going to be a less-theoretical form of posting. I'd hope that would lead to more productive and inspiring discussions.

Thanks for your post!

[–] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The internet tankies are just a small, mostly self-isolating group of authoritarian west-haters who wank each other off about how much theory they've read. They do not reach out to engage with the rest of the internet for any other reason than because their usual circlejerk spankbank ran dry and they need to refill it with new material. That entails baiting unsuspecting people into arguing with them by spouting rehearsed and reused, easily disproven talking point so the unsuspecting person is engaged with them for a few replies until they're deep enough into a comment thread that nobody else is going to read it. That's when their friends show up and they begin jerking each other off over you.

If you get to this point, you lost. Further replies add to their spankbank. Not replying proves them right and adds to their spankbank.

The only winning move is not to reply.

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Tankies are just another extremist cult, that’s extremely online.

Authoritarian Communists have a long tradition of fracturing into political sects. The whole theory heavy stuff is alike to religious texts and their interpretation.

These are political cults. They prey on the weak and lost by giving them something to believe in and a community of sorts. They can only stay part of the community by ideological purity.

This gives these small groups outsized propaganda reach. They will attack all leftists for not being extreme enough. That has a chilling effect.

Todays society, especially on social media, is fractured into small groups that punish disagreement harshly. Gen Z is more into conformity for example.

It’s like you said, an identity or fandom picked by vibes. Actual political change is irrelevant.

Prime example: the biggest left political streamer Hassan Piker is an extremist anti west tankie.

This tankie left completely ignores everything Frankfurt School for example. It‘s just about disillusionment and being anti west.

[–] dawnglider@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're a zionist. I frankly take offense on the behalf of all leftists to have someone like you pretend to represent our world view. You're not a leftist, you're a genocide supporting reactionary. The irony of you talking about "preying on the weak" and punching left in your psychoanalyzing drivel is clear as day. All you can do is punch left, because everyone here is left of you.

Also funny that you would mention your own personal parasocial feud with a streamer when everyone else is trying to have an adult discussion about politics, while maintaining that a broad century old worldwide movement is a "fandom".

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Zionist as in, I think Israel has a right to exist, sure. Palestinians have a right to self determination as well. I don’t support genocide.

Hamas are Islamists, which is right wing extremist, if you haven’t noticed. They are against everything leftist.

[–] dawnglider@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is Israel committing a genocide?

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But isn't that irrelevant to whether the country has a right to exist as a country? Does a country only have a right to exist when they do nothing wrong? Are all people in a country responsible for the actions of leadership?

Trump is crashing the entire world's economy, because he's a fucking short-bus slack-jawed special-ed moron. Does the harm that Trump and his oligarchs are causing mean that the US as a whole has no right to exist? Does Putin's invasion of Ukraine mean that Ukraine has no right to exist?

And let's flip that; Hamas attacks and kills civilians as a political stand-in for the Israeli government. That's the very definition of terrorism. Hamas is the government in Gaza. Does that mean that Palestinians have no right to a country of their own due to the actions of their gov't?

[–] dawnglider@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You are confused and mix up country and state. Germany didn't disappear magically after WW2. Do you believe the third reich had a right to exist? International law (as lacking as you might think it is) has prescriptions against that. Israel has been in constant and repeated breach of said law, including but not limited to the Rome Statute and Genocide convention, generally seen as the worst possible offense a state could ever commit. They've done nothing but ignore UN Sec Council resolutions.

Using the fact that the US has committed similar atrocities, including this one which they are the main sponsor of, completely unabated is really not the argument you want to make. Also sorry but it's hilarious to take Trump's tariffs as an example of something so horrible it would justify the dissolution of the state, consider it's the US we're talking about.

Ukraine's invasion by Russia is illegal, immoral and indefensible and yet is still not even comparable to those atrocities. Russia has faced countless sanctions for their actions, from banks cut off from SWIFT, frozen assets, banned export of petrol and gas, wide international bans on tons of goods, military equipment, and many other sanctions around shipping and transport. To my knowledge, Israel hasn't received any single coordinated material sanction for their innumerable crimes. I'm assuming you meant "does that mean that Russia has no right to exist", because otherwise this makes even less sense.

Hamas is but the latest governance of a people who have tried to defend themselves from said continued crimes. But this is just my meaningless opinion as some random guy on the internet, a court should be the judge of whether or not their actions should be sanctioned in the context of the atrocities they faced alongside their oppressor. You're trying to defend the point of a genocide denier, but hopefully you'll agree with me on that, right?

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You’re trying to defend the point of a genocide denier, but hopefully you’ll agree with me on that, right [emphasis added]?

First, that's a manipulative way of stating something; it's intended to force agreement. Although it's phrased as a question, it's not. This is a common tactic used by both high pressure salespeople, and by cults. It was one of the ways I was taught to pressure people into joining the Mormon church when I was a missionary. My suggestion is that, if you want to argue in good faith, then that's a rhetorical device that you should stop using entirely.

You are confused and mix up country and state.

You are correct. I am confusing them. However, in the context of Israel and their genocide against Palestinians, they're very nearly interchangeable. Hamas--and Iran, I believe--want to abolish Israel. Yes, the land itself would still be there, but it would not be a Jewish state/political entity. The country that Israel is would functionally cease to exist if Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran had their way.

Do you believe the third reich had a right to exist?

If you're limiting the question to existence, then yes, I do believe that the 3rd reich had the right to exist. However, I don't believe that they had the right to murder 6M+ Jews, Romani, LGBTQ+ people, and political dissidents, or to start a war of aggression. The force used to stop their murders and aggression also happened to be the same amount of force that ended the 3rd reich, but it's not necessarily that way.

They’ve done nothing but ignore UN Sec Council resolutions.

Well. Not exactly. I'm pretty sure that it's usually general assembly resolutions. I believe that the UN Security Council needs to be unanimous to pass a resolution, and the US--as a permanent member--always objects when it comes to condemning whatever atrocity Israel is currently committing. Which is pretty goddamn awful. And Russia does the same thing when one of their allies is doing awful shit. The ability of one member of the security council to hold up resolutions effectively de-fangs the council.

But - to your point, I agree entirely that the government of Israel, with the support of the majority of the Israelis, is committing and has committed war crimes against Palestinians.

“does that mean that Russia has no right to exist”,

Yes, sorry, I flipped Russia and Ukraine there. Me no type good sometimes.

But, at that--it is true that Russia has been severely sanctioned (...although $10 says Trumps ends most/all of those sanctions; did you see that Russia was the only country that didn't get tariffs?). But should the state of Russia be entirely wiped out? Should Russia--as a state--cease to exist? (Russia certainly wants Ukraine to cease to exist as both a country and a state; Putin wants it to be part of Russia.) And no, Israel has not faced any consequences, and that is an utterly shameful failure of leadership in the US and in the rest of the world.

...But it's also not directly relevant to the narrow question of whether Israel should be allowed to exist.

You’re trying to defend the point of a genocide denier

How so? He lit. said that he thinks Palestinians should have the right to self-determination, and that he didn't support Israel's genocide. ("Palestinians have a right to self determination as well. I don’t support genocide.")

Israel commission of genocide is independent of their right to exist; they DON'T have the right to commit genocide, and the world should be--should be--united in stopping it. Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran want to wipe Israel out, and commit acts of terrorism in pursuit of that; despite their actions--which I can understand given the actions of Israel--Palestinians and a Palestinian state also have, or should have, a right to exist.

I'm not sure where the disconnect is here.

I think that a true 2-state solution is the only realistic option, with borders returning to the, what, 1947? borders. I think that the world probably needs to have UN Peacekeepers there for the next century or so, and those troops should be allowed and required to use force to stop aggression from any side. I think that it was probably a mistake to have shoehorned Israel into the middle east in the first place; we should have given them Florida instead. (...Except that hardline Zionist Jews really, really wanted Jerusalem, because that was the territory that the believed god have given to them.)

[–] dawnglider@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

First, that’s a manipulative way of stating something

That's me being charitable and making the assumption that at least you recognize they should face a court of justice. Again, the argument starts at genocide denial here, I'm working with what I got.

However, in the context of Israel and their genocide against Palestinians, they’re very nearly interchangeable

This very confusion is often used to try to extrapolate something that I think is very reasonable, the dismantlement of the state of Israel, into something that is not, like the removal of all jews from the area, or the implicit support of their counter-genocide (which is an old fascist theory that's very popular in my country, the great replacement).

I do believe that the 3rd reich had the right to exist. However, I don’t believe that they had the right to murder 6M+ Jews, Romani, LGBTQ+ people, and political dissidents, or to start a war of aggression.

I'm trying to assume your good faith, but you're very conveniently talking about a state before it did any of those acts. Again if I'm being very charitable and assume you talk about the genesis of those states in the context of Israel being a colonial project, then no, of course Israel as a freshly conceived settler colonial state built on ethnic cleansing had no right to exist. But that only highlights the fact that Israel has never been justified, even if that's not the point I was making.

But should the state of Russia be entirely wiped out?

Like you said, It doesn't really matter because it's not the subject. But yes, Russia wants to destroy the state of Ukraine. Russia however is not an apartheid ethnostate built and run on constant ethnic cleansing and genocide. You could argue that in court if you wanted, but as despicable and bloody as Russia is today, it's not built on an inherently inhumane ideology.

How so? He lit. said that he thinks Palestinians should have the right to self-determination, and that he didn’t support Israel’s genocide.

This is why you misinterpreted my initial question, I didn't catch it. He never said Israel is committing a genocide. You assume he did because he said he didn't support genocide, I only asked the question because I know full well he wouldn't answer. You seem to agree that Israel is currently committing a genocide, and I think you might not have been as exposed to liberal zionism as some of us. He will never admit to that, because he understands as well as I do that this is the greatest sin of states, and you don't come back from it. If you think a state should survive a prolonged, livestreamed, unapologetic genocide, I urge you to reconsider your position.

I think that a true 2-state solution is the only realistic option

I disagree because it's untenable. The Israeli state will refuse the presence of UN peacekeepers (the 3 of them that we have). If that was a possibility we could entertain it, but I don't see another option other than UN administrative control, as has happened in the past in similar cases (Germany, Japan, Somalia, Kosovo, Timor-Leste). The two state solution was defended for decades with similar arguments as yours, but the reality is that an ethnostate is not something that we can ever let happen, and Israel continued existence is truly the perfect example of it.

There had always been very strong opposition both Jewish and not (and way before the formation of Israel) to the creation of a Jewish ethnostate, even in the context of continued Jewish persecution. For fairly nefarious reasons, this was done anyway. I think we're far enough now into the genocide that this idea should be permanently put to rest and left as one of many dark stains in our history. There's a very long list of emancipations throughout history, and how oppressed people dealt with their aggressors. The idea that this would be any different in Palestine, especially if it's done properly, is nothing more than good old fashioned racism, painting Arabs as monsters.

This process certainly isn't one I'd dare to outline exhaustively, but it would at the very least include the expulsion of settlers from the West Bank, reparations (I would personally consider it unthinkable if the US took on less responsibility than the sum they poured into arming this genocide), the rebuilding of the Gaza strip and of course an international trial of those responsible for this genocide. This might seem like a lofty ideal, but anything else is just defeatism and waiting for the last Palestinian to die or be expelled.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Personally I find their constant bad faith arguments tiring so I usually don't engage. Many campists have the right critique of the existing systems but are useless at knowing what to do to change it. Their best takes are usually to emulate socialist movements of the early 20th century like a cargo cult and hope if they do the same motions, it will magically lead to the same socialism (with them on the vanguard ofc). So ultimately worthless praxis built on stale rhetoric. It's telling that even the most "left unity" oriented campists manage to thoroughly alienating most of those they believe they should be united with.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s telling that even the most “left unity” oriented campists manage to thoroughly alienating most of those they believe they should be united with.

Every time they say left unity, it means "agree with us or you're ignored."

You don't want to have a state when where done? What about left unity! It'll go away in 5, 10 years tops.

You think having labor camps makes us as bad as capitalists? That's silly, what happened to left unity?

Every time an anarchist group works with a state socialist group, they are often the last ones removed when the Statists can secure enough of a foothold without them.

Every. Time. I might be willing to work with them to get something removed but if they want to just swap the flag of the state instead of abolishing it, they just want to be the person who stomps on the faces of the workers they claim to support.

You think having labor camps makes us as bad as capitalists? That's silly, what happened to left unity?

Exactly this. It makes me more inclined to think all of them are Russian troll accounts sent to further divide us rather than actual people. And if they're actual people, I still very much don't find them worthy of engaging with.

load more comments
view more: next ›