this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2026
349 points (100.0% liked)

politics

31507 readers
2989 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Most Americans now favor government-paid health insurance for all, according to a ‌new poll, as voters across party lines see major healthcare reforms as a priority less than a month before midterm elections to decide control of the US Congress.

Two-thirds of US adults — up from 53% in 2020 — said they are in favor of universal US health insurance often referred to as "Medicare for all," according to a poll conducted by health policy research firm KFF released on Tuesday.

By party affiliation, 84% of respondents who identify as Democrats and 72% of independent voters were in favor, while 66% of Republicans were opposed.

When told such ⁠a single-payer model would eliminate private insurance plans, that overall support dropped to 52% — still well ahead of the 37% favorability seen in the 2020 survey.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BooBees@fedinsfw.app 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Cool, let anyone who wants to opt out, and everyone who doesn’t is automatically signed up, just like how many nations automatically sign you up as a voter or for healthcare. Don’t want to have govt healthcare? Cool, you’re free to stay on private insurance that will skyrocket and collapse soon as the world adapts to a better system. We gotta stop letting malignant narcissists, sadists and the brainwashed ruin everything for everyone else.

[–] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I've lived in 4 European countries, and none had the option to "opt out" of health care coverage (other than being an illegal resident). It makes no sense to have that option anyway, it's like being able to opt out of paying taxes for education.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In pretty much all European countries you can still get private insurance if you want to. And some people do for various reasons. The difference is that if something happens with your private insurance, like you can't pay anymore or whatever you still have the public insurance to fall back on. Just because everyone gets public insurance doesn't mean private one is banned on something.

[–] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

In fact, in a few European countries the system is more private and doesn't even have the equivalent of Medicare or Medicaid.

It's just regulated in a somewhat less moronic way than the US health care system.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It makes sense if opting out means you don't get national insurance.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When they show up in the ER with a heart attack they're going to get treatment we can't pay for and we'll be right back to square one with all of this shit

Also, nobody gave me the option to opt out of paying for the bombs out dumbass military drops on schools and other civilian infrastructure, don't know why this is any different

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Even then it doesn't make sense. The cost for people not having insurance, even if they don't want it, is borne by society, and is generally higher than if they did have insurance.

[–] JandalsAweigh@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 weeks ago

As the world adapts? What do you mean by this?