this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
108 points (68.4% liked)

Fuck AI

7961 readers
1883 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] artwork@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] artwork@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Sorry, this is not the source. May I ask why do you share misinformation?
Not only the article is an entirely different case, has no such chart, but the "clickable links" on the website are fake, too:

[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

That is the original source I know. The content describes the content of the graph. Where is this misinformation? What did I miss?

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

They're complaining that the way "Source" in the image is highlighted implies it's a clickable link, which of course it's not.

Despite that, whether the links in the text are highlighted depends on the browser (which is odd). Using Firefox Focus they are invisible but are highlighted in my stock Andoid browser.

In Addition, the data in the text is global data, the data in the post is US only, so it's not the source of the data of the post.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago

You missed the part about wp-image-4776.lazyautosizes.lazyloaded. This is a critical part of the lore, because it means the author of that page used WordPress, and is lazy.

[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I clicked all links. None of them are fake. So, what the shit are you talking about?

[–] Chaf@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I hope I won't regret this, this is already the second time https://slrpnk.net/comment/23703343

[–] artwork@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Thank you for the actual references, effort, and your stance shared regarding it!

For the sake of your opinion on the environment impact, where you suggest to "stop eating animal products", I am sorry, but I disagree. Water used for animals is a water used for a life, which is fair, adequate, and well, one of the main reasons water exists in the first place, I believe. Comparing that to a dead lifeless machinery to support? I do not believe this is a fair comparison.