vapeloki

joined 2 years ago
[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Can confirm, would fuck the whole Lucifer cast.

[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I don't say the code isn't sloppy and should never go live I. It's state.

I say: show me the app on the app store that you can download and use.

We are talking about security issues in a reference implementation.

We are not talking about an app. All this does is to spread fear and if this whole thing is not accepted by the Public because of this , what then? We land up in a privatisation scenario once again and then fuck privacy.

This state of the Codebase is fixable, but stop talking about it like it would be a released app. It is not.

[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Ok, once again in slow: each country must implement their own app.

One for Germany, one for France and so on. Because it has to be tied into the ID card system of the country.

You can build the app in the repo but the app can not do any age verification without this integration. I even cited the fucking sentence from the readme.

[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (4 children)

We are getting somewhere. So a bunch of devs develop an SDK, and some demo implementations. No country adopted the app yet, there is no version that works, as there is no version by an ID card authority.

It does not matter what Ursel said, there is no app. There is only an SDK.

And to then the press talks about "the App". Why would one add such a node in the first place? Only because of this reporting.

https://github.com/eu-digital-identity-wallet/av-app-android-wallet-ui#important-note

The current version is not feature complete and will require further integration work before production deployment. In particular, any national-specific enrolment procedures must be implemented by the respective Member States or publishing parties.

[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

First sentence in the GitHub readme

The demo version is being updated. We will continue to release updates on the demo versions for community testing.

And once again: each country has to implement its own app. This version is just a technology demo and indented to be tested, hacked and reviewed

Edit : forgot the link to the repo https://github.com/eu-digital-identity-wallet/av-app-android-wallet-ui

[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (8 children)

This is the 20ies post I see about this.

And the 10th times I will say it:

This is a prototype release. This is not a production ready release. It demos the integration. Each country will build their own app.

[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Not Germany ffs. Friedrich Merz is not Germany, as Donald Trump is not the USA.

[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

As much as I understand the intent, license laundering is a real thing currently and mostly hurts open source.

We, as a open source loving community , should not fall into this trap

[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think the copyright question is gar simpler. Copyright requires creative work.

LLMs are not creative, they are an auto complete on steroids

[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Nope. Courts decided: AI output is never copyrightable.

[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I though a while if i should answer to it. And this is so wrong, and dangerous, that i decided to do.

First: Such licensing questions are part of my day to day Job. I will explain it to you like i explain it to first semester students:

A LICENSE defines the terms under which a copyrighted work can be used, distributed and so on. It does not matter what the work is. A few relevant examples:

  • Beats: in the music industry there is a market for beats. If you take a 10 second beat and in-cooperate it in your own music without having a license for it, you are in violation of copyright law.
  • Paintings: You can not have a copyright on the concept of using paint to draw pictures on a piece of linen, you can not have a copyright on the concept of a specific object drawn on linen. You can have copyright on YOUR version of it. If somebody else takes your work, and only modifies it slightly (or for example, include it into a book, that is a copyright-able piece of work), without having a license for it... copyright violation

So, this brings us back to our topic:

There is no difference between sourcecode, music, paintings or writings for the purpose of licensing.

So, as courts established, AI CAN NOT BE CREATIVE and ALWAYS based on other works. Therefore any AI generated Work is in itself are not protected by copyright.

So, EVERY piece of code that is AI generated is free to go for any purpose, it does not fucking matter if there is a GPL 3.0 header in the file. AI Generated == Public domain.

But: Projects use viral copyleft licenses for a reason. A company could just take the AI generated code, implement it, and if somebody has a problem with it an just shrug "It's AI generated, it's public domain".

[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (3 children)

So, by your logic I take the kernel source, or parts of it and use them verbatim in my property project?

You can see yourself that you are talking bullshit?

Or course code is and was licensable. Because code is more then hast if, else, for, while.

Ever seen that some code in some projects is dual licensed?

Why would anyone need this if only while projects are licensable?

https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/collection/eupl/licence-compatibility-permissivity-reciprocity-and-interoperability

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/63445187

 

AI is the future they say. But what future?

While AI still did not deliver the promised solution to climate change, it will for sure speed it up.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/42787520

Most of us have some blinking, light-emitting, colorful devices attached to our potatoes - or whatever the minimum specs for Linux are these days, haven't checked in a while.

And most of us use OpenRGB to control them. But I fear this single project has some major, fundamental issues. As with many projects, it grew very fast and very big.

It has over 200 supported devices today, and the list keeps growing.

But it wasn't designed to grow this fast or support such a variety of devices.

This has led to several issues:

Not all features can be implemented for all devices:

For example, devices with different available effects per zone aren't supported by design. You may have noticed that sidebar LEDs on some keyboards aren't controllable via OpenRGB.

No support for macros, DPI settings, and more:

It was always about RGB. This isn't an issue per se - it's the scope of the software. But:

Cannot coexist with macro/mouse controlling software:

OpenRGB needs to open the HIDRAW device to control it, and this is an exclusive operation. So no other software can hook those devices at the same time.

Growing backlog:

Device-support requests keep piling up, new devices wait a long time to be accepted - the usual open-source maintenance challenges.

My Idea

Let's create a unified device abstraction library. The core part should just offer a C++ library with all the device abstraction logic in it. This library can then be consumed by a variety of software:

  • OpenRGB could use the RGB part of it, focusing on orchestration and advanced features
  • Python bindings for scripting your setup
  • Hyprland integrations
  • Custom CLI tools
  • Whatever the community builds

Therefore, if you're a developer who knows your way around modern C++ features (or wants to learn), here's my project pitch:

What this could be:

  • Modernized device code (C++23, memory safety, proper abstractions)
  • Support for ALL peripheral features (RGB, macros, DPI, profiles, etc.)
  • Clean API for other developers to build on
  • Reduced fragmentation - community maintains ONE device library instead of competing implementations

Making this real would need:

  • C++ developers , as one developer is no developer (and i have other hobbies!)
  • People who've worked with USB/HID protocols on Windows and other Non-Linux platforms!
  • Anyone frustrated with current Linux peripheral tools and willing to help fix it
  • Design feedback and testing

To kickstart this:

We can fork OpenRGB's existing device implementations (GPL-licensed) as a foundation. I have at least two devices here that offer on-device macro functionality, key remapping, and more, so I can create the basic abstractions for those features.

Thoughts?

 

Most of us have some blinking, light-emitting, colorful devices attached to our potatoes - or whatever the minimum specs for Linux are these days, haven't checked in a while.

And most of us use OpenRGB to control them. But I fear this single project has some major, fundamental issues. As with many projects, it grew very fast and very big.

It has over 200 supported devices today, and the list keeps growing.

But it wasn't designed to grow this fast or support such a variety of devices.

This has led to several issues:

Not all features can be implemented for all devices:

For example, devices with different available effects per zone aren't supported by design. You may have noticed that sidebar LEDs on some keyboards aren't controllable via OpenRGB.

No support for macros, DPI settings, and more:

It was always about RGB. This isn't an issue per se - it's the scope of the software. But:

Cannot coexist with macro/mouse controlling software:

OpenRGB needs to open the HIDRAW device to control it, and this is an exclusive operation. So no other software can hook those devices at the same time.

Growing backlog:

Device-support requests keep piling up, new devices wait a long time to be accepted - the usual open-source maintenance challenges.

My Idea

Let's create a unified device abstraction library. The core part should just offer a C++ library with all the device abstraction logic in it. This library can then be consumed by a variety of software:

  • OpenRGB could use the RGB part of it, focusing on orchestration and advanced features
  • Python bindings for scripting your setup
  • Hyprland integrations
  • Custom CLI tools
  • Whatever the community builds

Therefore, if you're a developer who knows your way around modern C++ features (or wants to learn), here's my project pitch:

What this could be:

  • Modernized device code (C++23, memory safety, proper abstractions)
  • Support for ALL peripheral features (RGB, macros, DPI, profiles, etc.)
  • Clean API for other developers to build on
  • Reduced fragmentation - community maintains ONE device library instead of competing implementations

Making this real would need:

  • C++ developers , as one developer is no developer (and i have other hobbies!)
  • People who've worked with USB/HID protocols on Windows and other Non-Linux platforms!
  • Anyone frustrated with current Linux peripheral tools and willing to help fix it
  • Design feedback and testing

To kickstart this:

We can fork OpenRGB's existing device implementations (GPL-licensed) as a foundation. I have at least two devices here that offer on-device macro functionality, key remapping, and more, so I can create the basic abstractions for those features.

Thoughts?

29
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by vapeloki@lemmy.world to c/autism@lemmy.world
 

Hey all,

I don't know what to do, and need some advice.

Today I received the information that my father was moved to the palliative ward. He was in the hospital since a few days.

He had lung cancer, and lost half of his lung, now the tumor is back and restricting the remaining half.

He is dying. The doctors don't know when, and if there are days weeks or months left. Nothing to do but to make hin as comfortable and pain free as possible.

I want to visit him badly. But I am panicking already just thinking about what to say or what to do. I could call him but me, taking on the phone..., and the main issue remains, what should I say?

I am bad at social interaction, yeah. I live with that. But this situation is wo much worse I ever could imagine.

I love my dad. He is one of the most important persons in my life. Loosing him will of course be painful, but being in a situation where I can get the call every day, every minute ...

I am not able to work, think, sleep or be around other people very long.

Does anybody here have some advice?

UPDATE1:

Thank you all so much for your feedback!

TLDR: I organized a visit tomorrow, and made sure i will go through.

First, i want to clarify my issue, as yesterday i was rather vague: This is not a question about "to go or not to go". I am experiencing meltdowns on the pure thought of "what happens during the visit". I just lock up. That is nothing rationale. I have to overcome those meltdowns - and that is why i am asking for advice.

Your feedback helped a lot during this process. While i am still not at a point, where i don't freeze, not doing so would for sure not come to any good.

I asked my spouse to go with me tomorrow. She will make sure that i will go through. Also, i don't have to worry about medication to much ( I get medical cannabis), as she will drive me home if needed.

Again, thank you all! And every feedback is still welcome, it really really helps!

UPDATE2: I was in the hospital today. While yesterday he was doing well the day started off with a message that we should hurry. He was sleeping much, his morphine dose is high, but the tine he was awake hi listen to our conversation, my sister and brother where there, my mother. Hi talked not much, but talking is hard for him. When I talked he made jokes.

My GF told me, that after my brother and I left the room and she was alone with him for a few minutes, he told here that it is better this way. Overall we were 5 hours there.

I will be in the hospital tomorrow again. Thank you all again.

view more: next ›