this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
245 points (99.2% liked)

politics

30240 readers
2465 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tehran says fees to cover cost of managing waterway will come into effect at end of 60-day negotiation period

Iran has announced plans to introduce a system of maritime fees in the strait of Hormuz in two months, after the 60-day period of negotiation that has been triggered by the signing of the memorandum of understanding.

Tehran, claiming a historic victory over the US, said the strait was under its control and a European plan for a naval mission to escort ships though the strait would not be welcome.

The warning came as the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth reported that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, had said Israel “will maintain the security zone in south Lebanon as long as our security needs require it”, referring to the more than 600 sq km of Lebanese territory occupied by Israeli troops along the border.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And why fucking shouldn't they?

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago (5 children)

There is the notion of free passage on the seas. Imagine if every country could say “we’re enacting a toll on passage through our waters.” It would make maritime trade much more expensive and dangerous.

[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If Iran can do it, then Turkey can as well

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And the UK. English Channel is one of the busiest shipping lanes in the world.

If the Iranians who just surrendered can rake in billions in transit fees then so can we.

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Except you won't rake in billions. It's Brexit all over again: whatever you gain with putting tariffs on shipping and shouting how powerful and important and independent you are, you'll lose manyfold in general trade benefits... Everyone loses, and EU freight will find another way, rail to Genova and sail through Gibraltar or Suez, for example.

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Until some elected twat does it innit

[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Doubtful. More than likely the EU just pays or they go to war and occupy Britain. Billions either way.

And if Iran can do it and Britain could do it, then Spain can do it.

If rail could replace shipping, it’d have already done so. In Mexico they’ve proposed a rail line to bypass the Panama Canal and it’d do just a fraction of the Canal’s volume.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You don't own the channel, mate. UK gets a strip, france gets a strip, and the middle is international friggin waters

But it would be funny to watch you try

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"I made a blank statement that was absolutely identical to those made in earnest by nutbag nationalists why did no one see i was joking???"

Remember your sarcasm and joke tags, kids

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Nbard@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Numerous responses to it indicate otherwise.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Exactly. Or imagine if Indonesia and Malaysia go to warn over Malacca

[–] DistrictSIX@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Turkey has charged fees for passage through the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles for a long time as far as I know. They just raised it by 15% like three days ago.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

International law is whatever countries agree to. There was a notion that primary schools aren't legitimate missile targets, until, suddenly, they were. This is similar.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right and both changes make things worse.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Does it? The 'anything goes on the high seas' system has led to anarchy and piracy. I don't know if Iran's approach is the solution, but there needs to be some regulation.

[–] Astronut@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I’d like to imagine that MAGA didn’t elect King Dingleberry to be the fucker upper of all things but my imagefuckenator quit working on me!

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

This is more important than politics.

This is LOGISTICS

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I'm quite sure that Russia cheered on Donvict because they were quite sure he'd be a wrecking ball to everything American.

Sure he's enriching himself and his shitty family and those around him all the way. But everything else in America is getting destroyed by this total asshole.

I'm sure Vlad has a good laugh about it every fucking day.

[–] mech@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

That free passage through territorial waters can be denied by a country if necessary for its own security.
And that is exactly what Iran is doing. Closing the Strait was the only way to stop the US bombing them.

[–] StealthLizardDrop@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

is there no tolls to go through suez or panama?

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

There is for the Panama Canal for sure. To be fair, it isn't free to operate it, but at the same time there is a reason countries want to control waterways and it isn't as an act of charity.

The most expensive regular toll for canal passage to date was charged in April 2010, to the cruise ship Norwegian Pearl, which paid US$375,600.[127][128] The average toll is around US$54,000. The highest fee for priority passage charged through the Transit Slot Auction System was US$220,300, paid in August 2006, by the Panamax tanker Erikoussa,[129] bypassing a 90-ship queue waiting for the end of maintenance work on the Gatun Locks, and avoiding a seven-day delay. The normal fee would have been US$13,430.[130]

The lowest toll ever paid was 36 cents, equivalent to $6.75 in 2025, by American Richard Halliburton who swam the Panama Canal in 1928.[131]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panama_Canal

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lmao, they actually tolled him for swimming the canal? Incredible

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 7 points 1 week ago

Ass, grass, or wooden nickels, no one swims for free

[–] TrippingBalls@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Great example of inflation

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

That is different because they’re not natural waterways. If you’re saying any country can say “these waters are mine pay a toll” it’s basically back to privateers.