And I find copyright infringement still unethical. Because you are taking what's not yours, and the thing you're taking - is not some vital resource type you're taking out of desperation. It's a game.

[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Two sentences.

I stand corrected.

Because you are taking what’s not yours

But does the legal owner deserve to own it and profit off it? Again I ask you, do you understand the difference between what is ethical and what is legal.

It’s a game.

Piracy extends to all forms of media and software, not just games. I believe media is still incredibly important to a persons development. Media in all forms is a way to learn from other people and create a deeper understanding of how the world works. And taking that away from something because they don't have the means to access it legally is not right. On top of this people deserve to have fun, and taking away peoples opportunity to have fun just because they don't have the means to access it legally is also not right.

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

do you understand the difference between what is ethical and what is legal.

What is ethical to one - isn't for another. That's why we have a legal system.

On top of this people deserve to have fun, and taking away peoples opportunity to have fun just because they don't have the means to access it legally is also not right.

Who will pay for game development and distribution?

[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What is ethical to one - isn't for another. That's why we have a legal system.

So we should just accept the law as it is and assume the law is always right? Im here to debate ethics and question the law. Arent you here to do the same?

Who will pay for game development and distribution?

We have already stated that they can't afford to by the game and therefore wont be buying the game no matter what. Regardless of weather they pirate the game or not no money is going to the game license owner.

So to answer your question who will pay for development and distribution? Not this person.

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

So we should just accept the law as it is and assume the law is always right?

Yes. And to change the law you should vote and press your representative to change the laws.

Im here to debate ethics and question the law.

It's pointless, because the legal system is governed by laws, not by our conversation.

So to answer your question who will pay for development and distribution? Not this person.

Do you find it fair, that someone should pay, but not "this person"?

[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Look I'm sorry I don't have the time or patience to deal with this level of ignorance. You should really read a book or go talk to a homeless person to find out how liberal political systems really work.

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

A game is not some vital thing, like air, food or home.

[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago