So we should just accept the law as it is and assume the law is always right?
Yes. And to change the law you should vote and press your representative to change the laws.
Im here to debate ethics and question the law.
It's pointless, because the legal system is governed by laws, not by our conversation.
So to answer your question who will pay for development and distribution? Not this person.
Do you find it fair, that someone should pay, but not "this person"?
They might not know it.
using a helium balloon
Your own source stated that it was hot air.
Yeah - through virtual machines and emulators, but still.
Creators often sell rights to their game in exchange for money then and there. So creators are not anyways owners.
do you understand the difference between what is ethical and what is legal.
What is ethical to one - isn't for another. That's why we have a legal system.
On top of this people deserve to have fun, and taking away peoples opportunity to have fun just because they don't have the means to access it legally is also not right.
Who will pay for game development and distribution?
Are you sure this is the right thread?
Squirt is just a piss with a tracing amount of lube.
Ironically, world without US would look less secure to me
On the other hand, the world wouldn't have wars and coups, caused by the USA.
You specifically chose one sentence from my argument and anilised that
Two sentences.
And I find copyright infringement still unethical. Because you are taking what's not yours, and the thing you're taking - is not some vital resource type you're taking out of desperation. It's a game.
Mister Chef
So, mischief?
A game is not some vital thing, like air, food or home.