this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
249 points (99.6% liked)

politics

29378 readers
3400 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The immigration judges’ abrupt dismissals marked the latest efforts by the Trump administration to reshape the country’s immigration courts.

Immigration judges are executive branch employees who can be fired, unlike Senate -confirmed judges under article III. This is part of a broader pattern

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] obvs@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I mean, Trump is worse than Hitler. You know that, right?

He wants to genocide more people than Hitler AND is a pedophile.

I mean, I do not say this lightly. It’s not like there are a lot of people who fit that criteria.

It’s not about what you do. It’s not about what you succeed in being able to do. It IS very much about what your goals are and what you hope to be able to do, and Trump has made clear that his ambitions are to be worse than Hitler AND that he is a pedophile in addition to that.

And that's not even to mention the horrific look on Ivanka's face and her voice when she looked at her childhood bed.

https://www.tiktok.com/@underthedesknews/video/7588289084146158862

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

It is kind of maybe a tiny bit about what you do… Setting the two names aside, it’d probably be worse to have somebody kill a billion people than to want to kill a trillion?

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I don't think doing a competition between genocidal leaders is worth having.

Having said that. It's NOT about who is more evil in their head. It is absolutely about the material impact and results of actions.

Some loser without and influence or power can have the worst ideas and plans for human extinction in there head. It really doesn't matter to me if they have no actual ability or influence to carry them out. There have been a million "worse than Hitler" people throughout human history that you and I don't know the name of then. At least by that logic.

You are right though in a sense. The potential impact of a genocidal leader with the power and influence of the American empire can result in much more substantial death and destruction than Hitler could ever dream of. This is what makes Trump (or any fascist that follows him) have the potential to be so much worse.

But, again, if I was going to engage in a "who is worse" competition (that I still think is meaningless) I would still have to judge it on the material outcomes and not who is a worse guy "in their head". What's in their head can only come to impact through their position and extent of power.

There are plenty of people that are genocidal pedophiles "in their head". But they can't actually act upon those ideas because they didn't get put into positions of power and influence. The material outcomes are the only way to actually engage in a conversation like this.

Otherwise there is always some potentially worse person that existed or could exist. Limiting it only to the extent of the human imagination to cause pain to others. Which is not really a meaningful conversation to have.

TLDR: You're pointing to Trump because of the material position he holds and the real power and influence his ideas can have. But then say that the ideas are all that matters to judge "who is worse". If the "ideas" are all that matter there is no reason to point to Trump or Hitler over any other person in history or the future with genocidal ideas. It is specifically the material impact that makes their ideas matter. You can't ignore the material outcomes. The entire reason we know their names is because of those outcomes.

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I didn’t say that it’s ambitions alone.

Trump is 80 years old and has a track record which includes an 80-year crime spree which seems to include literally almost every crime that would be on a list of crimes people would come up with if asked to randomly name as many crimes as they could, AND serial rape AND pedophilia AND likely individual murderers AND the likely rape of his daughter God knows how many times.

Unfortunately, I think Trump's impact may be greater than Hitler. If nothing else, he has completely shattered a lot of assumptions about what is possible for the U.S. and the whole world, and he’s already gotten millions of people killed(through Covid, to start, through basically destroying USAID, through the Holocaust he’s literally working on within the United States, through starving countless people worldwide, through denying healthcare, through renditioning people to torture prisons in countries they have no connection to, et cetera.

And he literally threatened to wipe a civilization off the planet the same day.

He has significantly more weapons than Hitler, and significantly more ambition, a population that's 4–5 times the population of Germany's during World War 2, and has already announced his intention to invade countless countries and has already gone in guns blazing into at least two.

Hitler was terrible, sure.

But let's not give any historians reading this in the distant future any idea that Donald Trump hasn’t already been doing a bunch of horrible things. It’s not like he’s gotten to 80 years old and is just starting his list of bad stuff right now. He’s trying to add nuclear holocausts(plural) and serial genocide as the cherry on top to a lifetime of other crimes.

I am by no means saying Hitler wasn’t an ABSOLUTELY horrible monster.

I hope TO GOD that the history books have more reason to remember Hitler than to remember Trump.

But I fear that might not be the case.

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Furthermore Hitler was put there by years of oppression. Genuine reasons.

Trump was put there by the refusal to vote and hatred for minorities. Pathetic shit.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

please don't disregard nixon's and ailes's 60ish year propaganda project

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah look I’m pretty confident the American result comes from laziness, hubris and selfishness far more so than the German one.

They’ve all been taken into account. The American demand for privilege in consideration had been granted.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

ah, i might have missed the word hubris, i generally read a little too fast for my own good.

we do love our hubris. it's so much fun!

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

In the end, we will count the dead and compare numbers and cry about how fucked up that is. But right now there's no need to do so. Better do what we can to stop Mr. Orange.