this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

1379 readers
5 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

it seems to me that the outcome of the iran war is almost certainly going to be a severe weakening of the us position in west asia. why, then, did it happen? and why isn't the imperial bourgeoisie resolutely opposed to it? is iran in a worse position than i think, are they not as interested in kicking the us out of their neighborhood as i think, or is it just in (some) capital's best interest to withdraw from the region? what am i missing?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The bourgeoisie is never opposed to war, because they believe foundationally in their ability to profit from it. That's likely why Trump has been doing market manipulation, to keep those people feeling like they are winning. These people don't read sitreps, they only read balance sheets. Which means right now they believe that the Ukraine situation is great and the Iran situation is great. And that reinforces their belief that the USA will always be able to win any conflict it chooses and it will only lose conflicts for profit.

I do think that there might be calculus that showed the inner circle that they would never be able to hold West Asia against China and Russia and Africa combined. This may be their way of evacuating - leaving as much of a mess behind as possible so that no one can benefit from the resources. Essentially, "if we can't have it, no one can"

[–] timicin@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

leaving as much of a mess behind as possible so that no one can benefit from the resources. Essentially, “if we can’t have it, no one can”

makes me wonder about nukes.

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago

Even a dirty bomb would be enough