this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
1047 points (98.4% liked)

News

37617 readers
1442 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a US representative, said on Wednesday that she will oppose any future US military aid to Israel, including for defensive systems.

In a statement on social media, Ocasio-Cortez said that Israel was fully capable of funding “Iron Dome and other defensive systems”, and that “consistent with my voting record to date, I will not support Congress sending more taxpayer dollars and military aid to a government that consistently ignores international law and US law”.

Her remarks on Wednesday follow reports that she pledged to oppose any future military aid to Israel during a New York City Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) forum on Tuesday evening.

“Our allies who need our military aid must understand that we will provide it consistent with the Leahy amendment and the foreign assistance act”, Ocasio-Cortez added, referring to a law which prohibits the US from providing military support to army units that violate human rights.

According to City & State, which obtained a partial recording of the DSA forum, Ocasio-Cortez told members: “I have not once ever voted to authorize funding to Israel, and I will never,” adding that “the Israeli government should be able to finance their own weapons if they seek to arm themselves.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] starik@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I guess you mean because MTG was anti-Israel first? Not because of the genocide, but because she’s a white supremacist anti-Semite? Yay MTG

[–] Sunforged@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I honestly don't care why our representatives do what they do, I care about the material impact of the legislation they pass.

Example: If a Quiverfull MAGA crazy decides we need to fund childcare because women are just baby machines and childcare means they have more utilities to fight the "white genocide". Fine. It's fucking gross but let's get childcare in place and move to the next issue. All we have to do is make sure it applies to everyone equally.

This is how you get stuff done.

The difference is I'm not looking to someone like MTG to lead, so the fact that her abhorrent methodology arrived at the correct outcome is a canary in the coal mine compared to AOC who I am looking to lead based on moral convictions to fight difficult fights when needed.

[–] starik@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well she had her come-to-white-Jesus moment at the same time as she was resigning, so she’s not passing any legislation for you

[–] Sunforged@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why are you talking at me like I support her?

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Because to Blue MAGA, any criticism of a Democrat makes you the same as a conservative.

[–] Sunforged@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

True horseshoe conisours.

[–] starik@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Stop trying to make fetch happen

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Hey I found the blueMaggot

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I can't speak for the person you are replying to, but I know that I'm constantly critical of the Democratic party. I get called "BlueMAGA" for saying people are stupid for sitting out in 2024 instead of voting for Kamala. It's bullshit.

It's a thought-terminating cliche. It doesn't have any actual meaning, so they just use it as a cudgel to end discussion whenever anyone pushes back against their vapid bullshit.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago

I get called “BlueMAGA” for saying people are stupid for sitting out in 2024 instead of voting for Kamala.

I find that when people are throwing those accusations around - not voting for Kamala - it tends to be baseless and during a discussion where a leftist is being critical of Democrats. I know a lot of leftists did hold their nose and vote for Harris, but Dems and liberals aren't keen on acknowledging that because they want to blame leftists for Harris' terrible presidential campaign and loss.

Blue MAGA absolutely has meaning. It is blind sovereignty to establishment Dems and capitalism.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 8 points 1 month ago

Okay that's just a cope. MTG was pro-Israel until 2025 while also being a raging antisemite; tying her current anti-Israel position to her antisemitism rather than political opportunism is, as I said, a cope to distract from AOC's failure to do the same.

[–] n4ch1sm0@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

AOC included, but overall this criticism best applies to the Democratic party. In the game of politics, despite of what we know about MTG, yes, she outflanked the Democratic party on the genocidal Israel issue.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

jfc, like, click the fucking link. Just click the fucking link. Its queued to the time stamp you need to be reminded of what happened regarding these votes. Its right fucking there. Just click it.

I can't help people not knowing or remember what happened during house debates in 2021. I'm sorry if your memory isn't good enough to remember what happened in the house four years ago. She switched her vote from No to Present in a 2021 package for funding Israel's Iron Dome. She also voted for the resolution which redefined criticism of Israel as anti-antisemitism. Even later she voted against an amendment (led by MTG) to defund Israels Iron Dome. That last one specifically was her getting outflanked by MTG, because later, AOC goes on to vote against the entire bill.

This is how AOC justified it at the time:

This ends up being a completely unforced error since she went on to vote against the entire bill. Instead of taking a strong stance and being on the right side of an issue out the gate, she comes out as calculating, both sides, and then ultimately votes against when it wouldn't stop it anyways.

Ilhan Omar, Rashida Talib, Summer lee: They didn't make those mistakes. AOC is pivoting, which is good. AOC was not good in acting as part of a unified front against the funding of a zionist genocide.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Say what you want about MTG, but she's staying ahead of the messaging these days.

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's easy to do when you're full of shit

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Again, she's full of shit, but she did outflank AOC on this issue.

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Dems are still clutching onto their AIPAC funds, aren't they? Still fervently defending and funding Israel?

AOC is only now pivoting to the correct position. MTG got there before her.

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So are Republicans. So why is AOC responsible for all Dems, but MTG isn't responsible for all Republicans?

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Republicans will never stop supporting Israel and their genocidal ways. The Democrats like to pretend they aren't as bad as Republicans while doing the same shit.

MTG was on the right messaging about Israel before AOC was. Period. That's all I was pointing out to you, but apparently that's difficult for you to understand.

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No one said shit about who was better between Republicans and Democrats.

I thought the path there mattered, but I guess not when it's your girl MTG. Who gives a shit what someone that believes nothing says? Oh wiw a shit person said something you like to hear. They'll never actually vote for it or try to enact it, but hey you got to hear a comforting lie.

Could you try giving me something other than a nothing answer?

[–] starik@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, it’s not the path that matters, just the timing!

/s

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No one is claiming that the timing is the only thing that matters here.

[–] starik@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You think the “outflanking” being heralded is spatial?

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 0 points 1 month ago

Is it heralding or is it observation?

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They’ll never actually vote for it or try to enact it, but hey you got to hear a comforting lie.

Do you just....not follow politics? MTG has voted in accordance with her recent position against Israel.

She's not my girl (though thanks for that sexist micro-aggression). I'm just not going to sit here and pretend that AOC is the bearer of all truth and that she didn't vote to fund defensive spending in Israel last year.

Sorry you're upset with facts.

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I can't answer you so I'll just call you sexist instead. Cool.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 0 points 1 month ago

Calling grown women girls is sexist.

I did answer you, it's not my fault you can't understand.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh for fuck sake. So now we've got a bunch of people simultaneously talking down AOC for failing a purity test, and praising MTG? The fuck is wrong with you people?

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago

No, I am praising AOC for finally getting her messaging right and acknowledging that even MTG got there before AOC did.