this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
605 points (98.4% liked)

politics

31066 readers
2248 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

US Democratic Senator Mark Kelly has said he will "seriously consider" running for president in 2028 as he battles the Trump administration over a video in which he urged military personnel to refuse illegal orders.

The Arizona senator, who was accused of "seditious behaviour" by Donald Trump over the November clip, said he and his wife, Gabrielle Giffords, received "many" death threats after the president's comments.

"We get them on a weekly basis now," he told BBC Newsnight. "We had to get security to protect us 24 hours a day."

Asked if he was considering a White House run, the retired Navy captain said he was considering it "because we're in some seriously challenging times".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 82 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Either the next president will be a Democratic Socialist, or it will be a fascist. Democrats need to get back 20% of their base, plus the margin they need to pick up in the places they need to make up the differences they'll need to win the big house.

Ask yourself this without looking at this announcement: Can a corporate Democrat do that?

I'm telling you now, either the next president will be a Democratic Socialist, or the Republicans win. No amount of glazing liberals is going to make them capable of winning an election.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world -2 points 6 months ago (7 children)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 63 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

People dragging out Bernie in 2028

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 55 points 6 months ago (1 children)

As a Canadian, can you please stop picking ridiculously old people?

Find someone in the 45-65 year age range, you're going to get a better outcome that way.

Our oldest Prime Minister in the last 50 years started when he was 65, most of them have been under 50.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No can do. It will be a day of national pride when we elect someone with a triple digit age.

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We need a healthcare system that supports that first

[–] logi@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Since you only elect wealthy people, you do have that health care system for the relevant people. And fuck everyone else.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 46 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I love Bernie, but that ship has sailed. AOC is our next best hope, but we have to back DSA candidates at every level in every race. Even if we succeed, there is a real chance we don’t avoid violence. The Republic of Gilead is already here and the Republican pedo nazis don’t intend to ever allow or accept another fair, democratic election again. They are nothing if not open about that fact.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world -3 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Zetta@mander.xyz -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're getting downvoted, but I agree. Sadly, I don't think a woman will win the presidential election in the U.S. for at least another decade or two. Too many sexists, and subconscious misogyny

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Yes and also being Latina. Many people aren't ready for that, either. Irrelevant if her heritage is Puerto Rican. Too many idiots don't recognize that as American.

[–] Kn1ghtDigital@lemmy.zip 19 points 6 months ago

Let Bernie rest :'(

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 13 points 6 months ago

What a shame.

He’d only be eighty six years old.

[–] Nebraska_Huskers@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Would love it but to old. If AOC ran with him as vice, I would back that.