this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
972 points (98.0% liked)

Fediverse memes

3309 readers
638 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse.

Rules

General
  1. Be respectful
  2. Post on topic
  3. No bigotry or hate speech
  4. Memes should not be personal attacks towards other users
  5. We are not YPTB. If you have a problem with the way an instance or community is run, then take it up over at !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com.
    • Addendum: Yes we know that you think ml/hexbear/grad are tankies and or .world are a bunch of liberals but it gets old quickly. Try and come up with new material.
  6. This is not the place to start flamewars between Lemmy, Mbin and Piefed.

Elsewhere in the Fediverse

Other relevant communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 142 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

Who censored the beautiful nipnips of poor ~~Sisyphus~~Atlas?

[–] Okapi@lemmy.zip 46 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

If female nipples are still considered obscene, the same rules should apply to everyone ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 78 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I feel like the argument "If some people are wronged, everyone should be wronged!" has some flaws.

[–] Okapi@lemmy.zip 39 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's rather meant to show the absurdity of censoring female nipples (in a small sidenote)

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 60 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I would propose censoring female nipples with male nipples then. Since the latter need not be censored.

[–] Gnugit@aussie.zone 13 points 10 months ago

This is perfect

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sadly, a lot of people genuinely believe this. That all nipples should be censored/covered up.

Look up some discussions about female toplessness online. Unless you are in a queer/very progressive space, a very large number of people would support banning men from being topless too. Most common argument I've found wasn't equality but rather some people being ugly and not wanting to see them.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago

In that case, just ban ugly people entirely, not only their nipples.

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 10 months ago

Yeah, always better if all equally lose, instead of letting others win. Our society is doomed with a mindset like this.

[–] ClathrateG@hexbear.net 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

¯\_(ツ)_/¯\ you dropped this bud

[–] Okapi@lemmy.zip 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's because the backslash is a special character called an "escape" character. The same way you make italics by putting *asterisks* around something, you can use backslashes to tell the system to ignore other special characters and use them literally. In this case, the underscore, which if you had no backslash would cause the face to be italic, becomes "escaped" by the backslash so we see the underscores as normal. But then you don't see the backslash.

So you need to "escape" the backslash itself. Put two backslashes, and you'll see one. ¯\(ツ)¯\\_(ツ)_/¯

But then you're no longer escaping the underscores. So now you've got one backslash, but the face is italic and you don't see any underscores.

So instead, as a final step, add a third backslash. The first backslash escapes the second one, so we see the second one. Then the third escapes the underscore, so we see the underscore. (For a bit of extra security, you can optionally also escape the second underscore. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ¯\\\_(ツ)_/¯

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ¯\\\_(ツ)\_/¯

[–] Okapi@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 months ago

It worked! Thank you for the explanation :)

[–] Sergio@piefed.social 4 points 10 months ago

You missed a great opportunity for an "Atlas shrugged" quip.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 10 months ago

You’re right.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

don’t want to scare the horses

[–] Speiser0@feddit.org 5 points 10 months ago

The one who was seeking for your engagement.

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago

No worries: this is Atlas. S*syphus is not censored