flamingos

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 75 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Firefox is now exclusive to ternary computers.

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Famously they’ve been very successful where come from - Sheffield - but have absolutely nothing to put to their name following a long-reigning green party mayor of the city … other than some postulating and participstion in reality shows.

(Actually i would credit the green party’s success here with the delay to Sheffield getting an improved metro system, which is now only going ahead under a labour-led Combined authority for the entire county.)

He held a, what Wikipedia calls, ceremonial post for one year? The Greens also only had 8 councillors and Labour a majority, so this criticism feels very misplaced.

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True, direct financial support is basically always better than these convoluted financing schemes. Too bad the media will eat you alive if you try to do it.

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago

Maybe if the title was clearer that this was a nomination thread there'd be more engagement, because it does currently look like just an announcement post. !anime@ani.social and !canada@lemmy.ca did that and more people are joining in there.

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Sure, the Green party has a historic current of conservationists small-c conservatives who are only Greens because they want to keep landscapes pretty. Doesn't help that the only council the Greens have a majority in (Mid Suffolk) is held by that faction, but that will almost certainly change in May. Every party has cranks, but they do stand out a lot more and have a lot more influence in the Greens due to how small the party has historically been. Just look at the 'natural births' thing the Greens only dropped in the run up to the 2024 General Election.

Hopefully the Greens with all the momentum behind them now can leave most of that stuff behind, Polanski himself has come out in support of pylons and the people in my local Green party are from this new wave and are pretty sensible, so I have hope.

arguing that the government should subsidise scarce fossil fuel resources

No, they argue that the government should provide support to cap people's energy bills. This unfortunately means paying for fossil fuels, but that's just the nature of our current energy grid. Reeves has announced intentions to provide support for energy bills as well, they're just less broad than the Greens proposal and will mean people over whatever threshold the Treasury decides don't get the support they likely need. Do you think it'd be fair to brand the Labour government as subsidising fossil fuels when these measures are actually announced?

A caveat: The Greens proposal only really makes sense when done along with the Greens proposed broad tax rises.

but not do anything to increase our own production

Unless you're arguing for fracking, North Sea drilling won't bring in enough gas to meet our needs or even affect the price very much. We'll still need to buy most of it from Norway and arguing over domestic production is frankly a distraction.

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Article appears to have been deleted.

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 13 points 2 days ago (11 children)

green development gets blocked

The Greens control 12 councils and the only example the article brings up of the Greens blocking development is the pylon thing is Suffolk. While wrong, I don't think it's enough to say it's a systemic issue with the party.

 
 

src

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 3 points 6 days ago

This is two weeks out of date, the attack isn't even being treated as a terror incident. I don't know about this Ashab group, they could be a fabrication for all I know, but the reasoning here that the ambulance attack itself must be a false flag operation is very spurious.

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 1 points 6 days ago

This is good, though I prefer this track of the EP: https://chloeslater.bandcamp.com/track/were-not-the-same

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 1 points 6 days ago

It's always weird going through what I've listened to the past year looking specifically at the band's country of origin. I'm apparently Australian in music taste.

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)
 

The two weeks of leave for a woman and her partner is paid at the statutory level of just more than £194 per week, or 90% of weekly pay if that's lower.

It can be taken as one continuous period, or as two separate weeks, within 56 weeks of miscarriage and parents do not have to provide medical evidence - they only have to tell their employer what happened.

Before the change, parents in Northern Ireland were only entitled to two weeks' paid bereavement leave following a stillbirth after at least 24 weeks of pregnancy, if they had been in their job for 26 weeks.

That remains the law in the rest of the UK.

However, the Westminster government is planning to bring in a change for England, Scotland and Wales in 2027 – to provide parents with a right to take unpaid leave for a minimum of one week following a miscarriage at any stage of pregnancy.

Across the UK, parents are also entitled to paid statutory maternity and paternity leave after a stillbirth at 24 weeks or later.

 

Opening major new fields in the North Sea would make almost no difference to the UK’s reliance on gas imports, research has shown.

The Jackdaw field, one of the largest unexploited gasfields in the North Sea, would displace only 2% of the UK’s current imports of gas, which would leave the UK still almost entirely dependent on supplies from Norway and a few other sources.

The Rosebank field, also in Scottish waters but mainly containing oil, would displace only about 1% of the UK’s gas imports.

Tessa Khan, executive director of Uplift, the campaign group, which compiled the data from public sources, said: “New fields like Jackdaw and Rosebank would do vanishingly little to boost UK gas production. Even in the most optimistic scenario, and assuming none of its gas is exported, Jackdaw would provide just 2% of UK demand over its nine- to 12-year lifetime.”

It has already been shown, by authorities including the UK Energy Research Centre, that new drilling would not reduce oil and gas prices, or improve the UK’s energy security. It is also unlikely to produce durable jobs or major new tax revenues, as 90% of the UK’s North Sea oil and gas has already been burned, putting the industry in steep and irrecoverable decline. Companies are also demanding tax breaks to tap the new fields, which are harder to access than existing supplies.

 
 
 
1
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by flamingos@feddit.uk to c/okmatewanker@feddit.uk
 

src

 
view more: next ›