this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Apple

20497 readers
2 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Maybe I'm just out of touch, but I don't understand who this is for, and I think it's going to flop.

First of all...who is asking for thinner phones?

Secondly, the price. This is not an Air SE. This thing is only $100 less than a full-fat iPhone Pro, and $200 more than iPhone base (which is a particularly good value this year).

And what do you get for that price?

  • 2 fewer lenses than the pro, and 1 fewer than the base
  • Titanium frame, I guess?
  • Less powerful processor than the base
  • Inherently more fragile frame
  • Less battery life than even the base model (this was often cited as the shortcoming of the iphone Mini)
  • Slower charging speed than both models
  • no cinematic video mode

Are people really clamoring for thinner phones so badly that they'll spend more money for less features?

https://www.apple.com/iphone/compare/?modelList=iphone-17-pro%2Ciphone-air%2Ciphone-17

Edit: 1 week later and the Air underperforms the base model as well (as expected)

Also someone pointed out below that the 16e is only 2 grams heavier and is $400 cheaper.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 8 months ago (4 children)

what are essentially tablets

once you get a big screen, you don't go back, bean

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Only because that's all you can buy now.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I felt the same preference for large TVs, for which smaller options are def still available. you first think it’s big and then think it should be bigger. and the normal iphone fits in my pocket with lots room to spare

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You don't hold TVs in your hand though...

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

point is people who prefer small screens are unfortunately a vocal minority. the iphone minis were discontinued for low sales

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago

See Samsung Flip 7 sales. Apple is inventing this next year.

[–] ugo@feddit.it 0 points 8 months ago

I went from a motorola moto g3 (5” screen, 72.4mm phone width) to a samsung galaxy s9+ (6.2” screen, 73.8mm phone width) to an iphone 13 mini (5.4” screen, 64.2mm phone width).

I once held in my hand an iphone 4s, and I think that is the perfect physical size for my hands (58.6mm phone width).

Yes the (relatively) small screen on the iphone mini can sometimes be a bit of an hindrance, and yet I would buy an iphone 4s-sized phone in a heartbeat.

I got a big screen and I went back. I’d go back further if I could.

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Only because they don't sell phones with smaller screens. If there was a good smaller phone available, I'd go for it right away.

[–] TheFunkyMonk@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

I actually did go back to a regular iPhone Pro after using the Pro Max for a while, and feel like I could go even smaller. I have a tablet for when the situation calls for it, and I like my phone to be more compact/easy to hold.