ugo
You clearly haven’t read what I wrote. I wrote that the EU could have set up the repo on codeberg and a mirror on github for visibility. Instead they chose to host on github which is unjustifiable.
Yeah but what they said is meaningless. Searching for <tool> source code is how you would search for tool’s source code. Not “where to find source code”
I don’t need to know that foot is hosted on codeberg. Searching for its source code reveals that it’s hosted there.
I do not need to know that euro office is hosted on github, searching for its source code reveals that it’s hosted there.
If you search on github itself that is your fault. If the goal is digital sovereignty for europe, hosting code on an american-owned forge when a perfectly viable european one exists is idiotic.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=foot+terminal+source
Very first result is codeberg
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=zig+lang+source
First result is the official website, second is github because they migrated very recently (links to codeberg) third is codeberg.
Yes, skill issue. You are complaining that you search for “where to find source code” and complaining that the vapid useless SEO-optimized articles that you find do not mention codeberg? Your search query sucks. Search for <tool> source code or similar instead.
I find code on codeberg all the time. Skill issue if you can’t.
Of course there’s no readily available european alternative to github, if you exclude the most obvious readily available european alternative to github.
If you are in europe, check out 42keebs.eu
But yes, it’s much more difficult to find kits nowadays
At this point I can only wish for horrors beyond our comprehension. Unfortunately, the current horrors are well within my grasp.