vatlark

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

I give monthly

[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

I use libre Calc for my donations.

If you want to sum based on a criteria you can use sumif().

I use it to track what types of donations I make (deductible, political, etc)

[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How do you figure? All the em dashes?

[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

https://www.runforoffice.org/

Lots of local elections go uncontested or have very low turn out.

[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How is Sweden so low? They are pretty far north but >5x lower than many others?

[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is what I see:

OTTAWA — The United States has flagged Canada’s early interest in a sovereign cloud that would bar foreign governments from accessing data without consent as a potential trade irritant.

U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer included it among several procurement issues in the annual report on foreign trade barriers he submitted Tuesday to U.S. Congress and President Donald Trump.

As always, Canada’s tightly controlled dairy market got a mention. So did the Online Streaming Act and the Online News Act, which Greer has flagged as priorities for the coming review of the North American trade pact. The federal government’s Buy Canadian policy for contracts over $25 million is a new one this year, as are moves by some provinces to keep U.S. alcohol out of liquor stores. The long wait for regulatory approval of aircraft and a proposed change to the disclosure rules regarding fragrance allergens in cosmetics also debuted on this year’s list. Gabriel Brunet, a spokesperson for Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc, said the government’s trade team is reviewing the report.

On the sovereign cloud, the report cites an August 2025 “request for information” by Shared Services Canada, the federal government’s central information technology agency, asking Canadian suppliers about their ability to provide the federal government with a “fully sovereign public cloud solution.”

That feedback would then be considered in future procurement policy development, which the agency framed as a response to “emerging challenges relating to digital sovereignty.” Shared Services did not mention the U.S. specifically, but the onset of Trump’s trade war and his threats to annex Canada by “economic force” months earlier had thrust the issue into the spotlight.

Greer’s report notes the proposal calls for cloud services where data would be “processed, transmitted and stored exclusively in Canada.” It would exclude suppliers subject to laws letting foreign governments access Canada’s data without written consent. (Another requirement Greer did not mention: providers could not be “subject to foreign laws that permit foreign governments to request measures that could affect or discontinue the service.”)

Shared Services said it was unable to comment in time for publication, but an update to the request for information suggests the conditions highlighted in Greer’s report remain. In its notice, the agency said it had invoked the National Security Exception for all stages of the procurement process for sovereign cloud services. That means nothing in any of Canada’s free trade agreements barring such protectionism would apply.

There is a difference, though, between exploring the possibility of creating a “fully sovereign public cloud solution” and actually doing it—especially without U.S. tech giants.

The federal government acknowledged as much last October in its “framework” on digital sovereignty: “It is impossible for the [government of Canada] to obtain a state of complete digital sovereignty, known as digital autonomy, due to the absolute interconnected nature of the digital world.” Manav Gupta, IBM Canada’s chief technology officer, told The Logic last month that the views of Canadian politicians on digital sovereignty had been “maturing.”

In January 2025, the federal government said it would review its business relationship with Amazon after the e-commerce firm closed its fulfillment centres and sorting facilities in Quebec. As The Logic reported, that review led officials to conclude that Ottawa’s reliance on Amazon Web Services, its second-largest cloud vendor, limited its leverage against the tech giant.

[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah I had never seen a comparison before. My expectation was just based on the amount of news I see on surveillance in a given area.

[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Huh I would have guessed London would be far higher than LA.

[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Whoa, did a piece of software take the roof lines and compare it to satellite imagery? That's impressive

[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

In the US, politicians are rarely in on the schemes themselves, they get money more indirectly from lobbyists, superPACs, or insider trading. Are politicians in the UK not able to profit from their votes?

1
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by vatlark@lemmy.world to c/peertube@lemmy.world
 

Even if the thumbnail is broken the video should work

[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Yeah caffeine has been around a long time. I'm sure these simple solutions won't last much longer. They will us AI to monitor the actions are meaningful so people will use AI to make the actions look meaningful and so on...

[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
 

While not the IKEA shark, I imagine his platform would be endorsed by the shark, with LGBTQIA+ protections, and opposing the Israel's genocide.

274
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by vatlark@lemmy.world to c/opensource@programming.dev
 

EDIT: They want users to help generate a dataset. You just play a game and email them the data when you are done.

I just did it, it was easy.

 

First I wanted to give a shout out for the amazing work by the jmp.chat and cheogram teams for offering a great alternative to Google voice.

Now the issue; sometimes when I open cheogram it seems to forget my contacts. So all of my existing chats just show the phone numbers. The group chats still have their names.

Then the names come back later, but the problem is pretty common and renders SMS nearly impossible.

Anyone else have this problem?

 

I am really impressed by how well organized they are and how much they have been able to accomplish so little funding. The Global March to Gaza, then the Sumud Floatila have been some great ideas for significant peaceful action.

During the last flotilla and just afterward we saw:

  • A general strike in Italy.
  • Spanish and Italian war ships deployed.
  • Spain's complete arms embargo is enshrined into law
  • Many nations recognized Palestine for the first time and reaffirmed their recognition.
  • Even the US, the most significant sponsor of the genocide, proposed the best peace plan of this administration and took a small but material step in opposition to Israel.

I'm hopeful the momentum continues and I think these people have demonstrated their trustworthiness as much as any group.

4
Quality info on the aid situation in Gaza (frames.forensic-architecture.org)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by vatlark@lemmy.world to c/palestine@lemmy.ml
 

Really great maps and info on how the aid stations are distributed and operate.

You hear that basically no aid is getting distributed, but the details of the aid stations being hours away and only open 20 minutes a day if at all really clarifies how performative and meaningless the "aid" is.

 

...Other than salt and pepper

For me it's cumin. It's one of the few spices I buy in bulk and actually use up my supply.

In the winter it may lean towards cardamom thanks to copious amounts of chia.

 

Maybe it's not surprising, but moving my saved places from Organic Maps to CoMaps took maybe two button clicks.

Export, select CoMaps, done.

Now to move my donation :)

 

This proposed rule change is open for comment until May 19.

My comment was:

I urge the rejection of this proposed rule.

I think we can be very thankful for the definition of harm as currently defined. If we were talking about the human species there would be no doubt that significant degradation of our ability to feed, shelter, and produce offspring would indeed be considered harm.

From only an economic perspective this proposed rule change is extremely counter productive. We learn an enormous amount from animals and that knowledge creates enormous economic value.

An example is the horseshoe crab. The Virginia Institute of Marine Science estimates the value of horseshoe crabs to the medical research industry at $100M per year. In 2023, the US Fish and Wildlife Service began work to aid their reproduction and support this industry. If harm is no longer defined as a significant decline in ability to reproduce, will we be able to protect this industry?

As our technology advances we are always learning more from animals, so we don't know which animals will give us our next billion dollar industry. After we decimate a species, we may not get to choose if it goes extinct, and with each extinct species we inflict immense harm on current and future generations of humans.

 
 
  • "Ein dog run dans le park, et son owner rennt après."
  • "Un dog läuft in le parc, son master run après."
  • "Ein doggy cour dans le parc, und der owner läuft nach ihm."

The silly language used in the 'Poland ball' memes got me wondering if that language was actually easier to understand for users of multiple languages. So I tried to get chatGPT to unite multiple languages (I tried Le Chat first but it wasn't as good).

My prompt:

Rewrite this phrase so that it is most understandable to people that only speak English, other people that only speak french, and a third group that only speaks German. You may use words from any language and you may misspell words if the word you use, although being mispelled, is more easily understood by speakers of both languages. You may not use slashes to separate two words for the same thing. You may change the phrase's structure as long as the meaning is the same. The phrase is: There is a dog running in the park. The owner is running after it

It's answer:

Here’s a version of the phrase rewritten to be easily understood by English, French, and German speakers:

"Un dog is courir in the park, und le master cour après."

Explanation of choices:

"Un dog": "Dog" is a simple English word that’s often understood by French and German speakers, and “un” is French for “a,” also recognizable to many.

"is courir": A mix of English “is” and French “courir” (to run), easy to guess even for German speakers who know “laufen” or “rennen.”

"in the park": Fully English, but all three languages share similar terms (“le parc,” “der Park”).

"und le master": “Und” is German for “and,” “le” is French for “the,” and “master” is close to “maître” (FR) and “Herrchen” (DE), but more internationally recognized.

"cour après": French phrase for “running after,” also intuitive to others.

1
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by vatlark@lemmy.world to c/til@lemmy.ca
 

The theorem has been expressed colloquially as "you can't comb a hairy ball flat without creating a cowlick" or "you can't comb the hair on a coconut".

view more: next ›