threeganzi

Or at the very least pay it back.

Isn’t the problem with your example that a completely color blind person cannot differentiate the wavelength, but they can differentiate the intensity of light. I’m also mostly assuming here, that our light cones are sensitive to certain ranges of frequency and that is how we can differentiate different wavelengths.

The scientific and philosophical question is if we can prove that each person perceive those combination of signals the same way. The subjective experience.

Unless of course the color blindness is a “software” issue rather than a “hardware” issue.

It’s pretty neat but I think a drawback is that the data needs to be normalized. I don’t think you can put the raw data in there.

Then they would need to know where you are as well.

You have a point, but perhaps try a softer tone next time. I think that would help your argument.

I think you’re doing your argument a disservice by comparing it to theory of gravity. But I do appreciate learning about this hypothesis and that there is actual experimentation going on. Thanks again for sharing.

Thanks, that’s an interesting read. Still stand by my opinion that your statement is overly confident in explaining consciousness.

Any source on your claim about consciousness? Sounds very speculative.

Yeah but it’s no the story here.

No, it’s that some executives allowed us law enforcement into operations that is not allowed by law in Mexico. And that US law enforcement embarrassed said executives by revealing failure to respect those laws. All parties probably learned something from this.

Nice. I bought a old unused Stanley plane but that had a plastic handle that was cracked on delivery. Recreated it in wood which was a fun project, figuring out how to drill the holes to make it fit correctly.

Ah, that explains the leather pants.