Crazy, but it makes sense to re-invigorate the fanbase a bit before TW4 comes out (and maybe they're even setting up villains for it?).
t3rmit3
Hell yes! Clean out the corporate-and-special-interest-bought Dems, and get real progressives in.
No, this is different. OpenCore refers to when part of an application is open source, but major functionality or components of the application itself are not.
ElasticSearch is this way, where the elasticsearch package itself is fully open source (AGPL), but you have to pay tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars for its SIEM addon.
What OP is talking about wrt discord is not actually non-FOSS at all, it's purely about the community (support, discussions, and documentation), nothing about the application itself.
Even the Steam integration does not change the status of the source code itself; OP could fork it and remove the Steam integration.
They may not have (publicly known) info sharing agreements with the US, but they're not adversaries either. China is.
Rom got his redemption arc though, he turned into an actually good dad later!
Get a VPS in Hong Kong. Set up your own point-to-point VPN (OpenVPN, wireguard tunnel) on it. Is the Chinese government spying on you via the VPS stack itself? Sure, probably. But they'll laugh their assess off at a US govt. request to turn over that data.
This is an oversimplification that ends up being deceptive by coincidence, because hardware is supposed to drastically reduce in price as it becomes standardized and mass-produced, and game consoles and computers both did this.
That we're now back to the point where a console costs nearly the same as the adjusted cost of the very first, hyper-niche, hyper-bespoke hardware units in the 80s, is a HUGE regression. Prices aren't "in-line with" the Atari prices because that's just how they scale, they're there by chance as they spike upwards due to supply constraints driven by AI.
"Even though we've lost all engines and are in a nose dive, we're currently at 300ft, which is in line with a normal landing approach altitude."
I'm against AI art because that is going to be used to degrade not just the value of artists' labor, but the actual art being viewed itself, because the people who will be choosing what looks "better" are the same marketing and business execs with no taste who have been turning out non-AI CGI slop for 15 years+. They'll become a filter that slowly converges everything towards the im-14-and-this-is-cool Marvel-ification of media that we're already wallowing in.
Just like how "Millennial Grey" was foisted onto us who cannot even afford to buy homes, and effectively blamed on us, AI Coke Bear will somehow end up being our "choice" of art too.
But this gotcha is nothing new; I remember people doing this to troll bozos who claimed they could spot photoshops back in the early 2000s. People playing the "I can spot AI because it's so bad" aren't being "blinded" by their anti-ai hatred or something, they just want a reason to play at being smart online. I guarantee you this is not the only thing they become instant "experts" in when there's online controversies.
Ignoring that Bloom's Taxonomy is outdated and disproven (not that it was ever based on empirical data)...
students are supposed to get to the application point in undergrad and that college is supposed to provide that practice
This hasn't been true for a long time, ime; colleges have mostly been about laying foundations for years, ever since we moved to a gen-ed system that disfavored any kind of specialized learning at the cost of any usable skills (and since defunding and prison-ifying high schools made even gen-ed baselines not happen in practice). They've been having to make up for what kids aren't getting in high school, but that also means that by the time they leave with an undergrad they have almost no experience of applying their knowledge to real-world-repevant problems.
It is not clear to me if democracy can survive a deregulated Internet. A deregulated Internet filled with LLMs that can perfectly impersonate human beings powered by unregulated corporations with zero ethical guidelines seems like a somewhat obvious problem.
Nah, no thanks. The idea that we have to allow government control of online spaces in order to a make them safer, rather than just government-ideology-aligned, is an insane thing to be believing in 2026.
Yeah, let's have Trump's FCC decide what is acceptable speech and what's dangerous. Decide the ethical code that provides "sufficient justification to unleash it on the world". I'm sure it won't be "is it enriching conservatives or promoting our ideology?".
Great plan.
ah yes, the continuing fantasy that the declining birthrate among white Americans is some shadowy conspiracy or cultural threat (which it is, if your "culture" is just White Supremacy) rather than no one wanting to raise a kid with some right-wing neanderthals (or having the money to do it anyways).
"If conservatives become convinced that they can not ~~win democratically~~ persuade women to be baby factories consensually, they will not abandon conservatism. They will reject ~~democracy~~ consent."
Anyone who thinks that an open propaganda arm is going to cease operation when it becomes publicly unpopular, rather than becoming a covert propaganda arm, is hopelessly naive.