racemaniac

you've got 13 months in a year?

Which Europeans? because there is no such thing as "Europeans". At least in my part of Europe tipping is pretty rare, and not expected at all.

What the heck are you doing, doesn't every single player just... play the music? How could the quality be worse?? I can imagine having gripes about the UI of some players, but the quality??

What do you mean? there are so many audio clients that can can connect to jellyfin. finamp, jellyamp, sonixd, .... What is it you're missing in a jellyfin audioplayer?

You know what, i'm in :) On my field, i'll have a ship on every single square, so no matter where you aim, you score a hit :) And on your field, you just have 1 ship of 5 long, so i have only a 5% chance to hit :).

Do remember though, the game ends when all our ships are sunk.

So you will have to do 100 shots every round to win (covering every single square) While i just have to find your ship (with some basic strategies, i'd estimate not even needing 20 shot to do that), and then i win :).

... starting to get it? XD

you're focusing so hard on how easy it is to hit a ship, that you forget the goal of the game: sink every ship.

If my entire playfield is ships, you'll indeed hit with every single shots, but you'll also need the maximum of 100 shots every game to 'win' XD.

Just so you know: the valuation of SpaceX has nothing to do with the space side of the company. If you look at their projected revenue, the rockets etc... are a footnote. but SpaceX acquired XAI, and literally all of this projected growth is SpaceX becoming the leading AI company in the next decade.

(and i wish i was joking, but i see everybody here wondering how a space company could possible grow that much, or be expected to. And the answer obviously is it can't, and noone expects it to. But an AI company in this AI bubble, that people believe....)

Suppose we all did read the docs. How possible is it with the complexity of a modern system to really take literally everything in account, and understand the implications oof everything to keep your system safe? It's great that it's documented, but if security isn't the default option, it will lead to issues, and everything has become so complex, that imo correctly managing everything is literally impossible... This is a systemic issue, not a user issue.

I haven't seen it mentioned here yet, but software freedom conservancy is doing a fundraiser to bring bambulab to court, any donation from now till half july will be part of the fundraiser: https://sfconservancy.org/donate/

What do you mean by "cheating in games is just not that serious"? If you mean viewing life in general, it's not much of an issue: for sure. If you mean for specific games it's not much of an issue, disagree. There really are games that are being completely ruined by cheaters, and that's what they're trying to combat.

And if you ask my solution, why have games boot into their own OS where they can do anticheat in that kernel, instead of the kernel i use for other things too. Something that would achieve that conveniently would be awesome, it's not as if pc's still take ages to boot.

Can you agree we can't put an infinite amount of people on a finite planet?

So that by default the discussion is not if overpopulation can exist, but when we reached it? If you don't feel we reached it yet, i can imagine that. It's a very tough topic. But just the very basic facts of existing on a planet of finite size means that there can only be so many of us before everything collapses.

And which fascist things do you associate with the "overpopulation" topic (i imagine for example the one child policy in china?). It's not because something has been used by fascism, that it's inherently fascist.

It kind of says a lot about this place that some slight pedantry is immediately viewed as malice...

And this meme is still terrible :p

Current agricultural progress is mostly about needing as few people as possible for farming, not making enough food for everyone. It's widely known there is plenty of food, the issues are social as to why some are still hungry, not technological.

And in the end, we're on a finite planet, so whichever way you look at it, keeping increasing population numbers has to end somewhere, so the question is not does enough humans exist, but what is enough, and i think there are plenty of arguments thaht we're overpopulating the earth already.