To repeat myself . . . Anti piracy is pointless for single player games. Without the need for anything online game cracks don't have to work hard to bypass such copy protection. Also it is anti social, often requiring to be online just to play a purely offline game.
Do you WANT this stuff?
Really? It constrains or prevents modding, which is a core part of PC gaming.
Copy protection for single player games is essentially pointless. Even GTA V let's you do what you want in single player mode because it is offline.
The only reason they might want anti tamper is to support in game purchases, which is equally senseless for single player games.
According to their own site it is both apparently. Either way it is used for both purposes, and for single player that makes no sense.
Yes that is an issue. Personally I avoid touching handles in public toilets without some tissue in my hand. I usually grab some on my way out.
It may have other nefarious uses but it is primarily anti-cheat software.
The door handles and surfaces in public toilets are not clean either. It is not just your own piss that matters.
Putting anti cheats in single player games should be illegal.
192.168.0.1/admin
pacman / yay
I also like pacseek as it provides a simple tui for package search and getting info about packages.
I wish r/highqualitygifs would migrate to Lemmy.
Electron is a relatively recent thing. What did Devs do in the past?
Server
"Core" Switch
WIFI and Internet Router / Firewall
If you want to prevent piracy don't make games ridiculously expensive, or block modding, or force users to be online when they shouldn't need to be.
Its the same problem TV streaming service are having. Their model worked when they priced it well and you didn't have to get 5 different services. Now that's happened privacy is well on the rise again.
It is nuts to think that copy protection for single player games makes financial sense when all it does is piss people off and encourage more piracy.