martti

Flat earthers are more convincing than ts.

I think they also demand social housing and stopping of exploitation of global south (therefore stopping migration crisises). So what's the deal?

There are plenty of "shithole ultra corrupt contries". But the only ones who care about them seems to be anti-imperialists like most of people on Lemmy. So you are not leftist i assume? Or how does your definitely unbiased description of a relatively poor country matches with the values of socialism.

Giant petrodollar nation was forced to do so😢

Ideology of УПА is atrocious, but i should give the respect for fighting both Nazis and Tankies. Wolyn massacre is also a really bad incident that shouldnt have happened. But to be fair, forceful assimilation, violance, hate, and even concentration camps for ukrainians in wolyn at the time are obviously going to spark a rage in ultranationalists, but at the same time doesnt justify massacre.

"Death • to all, who stand in the way of freedom for working people." "Смерть • всiм, хто на пиришкодi добутья вильностi трудовому люду."

Tankie tears is music for my ears

Speed is the worst category.

That's actually what left-wing nationalism is often about (But not always, sometimes it is economical left-populists trying to cope) Also I dont think we need anyone to tell how to relate to others. In a healthy(!) society people can sort themselves out without need to be controlled by some multi-culturalist enforcement (because idea of multiculturalism is kinda impossible)

Delusional tankie got raged about the truth about bolsheviks being extremists and not nearly as popular on the formal and fair elections. So they casted the "LIBERAL!!!" spell. So much for tankie brainrot mythology ig :/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Constituent_Assembly

Referring to being popular in cities is also funny, because at that moment like 80-90% of russians lived in villages far far away.

What I meant is that bolsheviks were not popular nor they ever represented people of russia. And you still cant bother to read how the revolution went. Any totalitarian 'socialist' regime is not socialist, it is purely oligarchic corporcracy. Why corpocracy? Because both USSR and China busted worker unions, had hilarious elections, prevented regular people from becoming politicans or have any say. And ensured only their oligarchic circle could get to power. How is this different from authoritarian capitalist corporacy? Corporations also have planned economy, they also bust their worker union, and they also keep their people in fright of the state machine.

This kind of system is just as far from socialism as a late-stage capitalist state, and serves capitalists and imperialists.