martti

joined 1 month ago
[–] martti@suppo.fi 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

What I meant is that bolsheviks were not popular nor they ever represented people of russia. And you still cant bother to read how the revolution went. Any totalitarian 'socialist' regime is not socialist, it is purely oligarchic corporcracy. Why corpocracy? Because both USSR and China busted worker unions, had hilarious elections, prevented regular people from becoming politicans or have any say. And ensured only their oligarchic circle could get to power. How is this different from authoritarian capitalist corporacy? Corporations also have planned economy, they also bust their worker union, and they also keep their people in fright of the state machine.

This kind of system is just as far from socialism as a late-stage capitalist state, and serves capitalists and imperialists.

[–] martti@suppo.fi 1 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

"Hey gemini, pls tldr history of social-revolutionaries". Just shut up and dont embarass yourself. Dont try to narrow my original answer and read the wikipedia at least.

With every answer Im more and more convinced you live in american suburb or some.

[–] martti@suppo.fi 1 points 23 hours ago (6 children)

The fact you have no idea who social-revolutionaries are, means you gave a huge rant about your views, meanwhile having no idea how the most important socialist revolution went. Or even such a simple thing like socialist democratic consensus of pre-60s Congratulations you are a fucking tankie. And I dont get paid to explain history to americans. May your extremist pseudosocialist brainrot mythology stay with you

[–] martti@suppo.fi 1 points 23 hours ago (8 children)

It is possible. We had socialist consenus not that long ago :/ The only possible way to achieve at least near-socialist system is democratic. If the system does not directly represent views of their citizens, eventually you get oligarchic corpocracy with planned economy, that will crush all the nations beneath their boots. Furthermore: Bolsheviks were fucking extremists. When post-revolution parliament was established, and parties ran for seats, the majority of votes were Social-Revolutionaries, bolsheviks didnt have nearly as much votes. But then bolsheviks just shut down the parliament because they lost, and put their opponents in jail or even executed. So much for the people's republic ig.

Instead, we need to actually get support in southeen countries, fight US hegemony and get votes in european countries, but this time hwlping global south first would be priority, so the european and us capitalists couldnt move their capital to poorer parts of the world and thus destroy the socialist consensus.

[–] martti@suppo.fi 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Market socialism and worker's self-management. Heard of it?

[–] martti@suppo.fi 2 points 3 days ago

Wait, we have to move Israel to Utah

[–] martti@suppo.fi 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Their political activity is remarkable. It is the kind of activity every country needs. Only problem i see is that french activists put the most effort into protests instead of more effective ways of spreading their ideas.

[–] martti@suppo.fi 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Proud of you skill opening people's profiles. Maybe your smooth brain isn't that much of a problem to get along with motorical tasks you had to suffer through when making 2 clicks :/

[–] martti@suppo.fi 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Whatever floats the bloat of your demagogy

[–] martti@suppo.fi 2 points 6 days ago

It fun and sad at the same time ..

 

There is a leaked document of the proposal related to EU KIDS Act , which proposes requiring age verification for all online games. Also note that this proposal is not anywhere near to pass. But it exists and is going to be dicussed

Stop Killing the Internet initiative

If you're EU citizen sign this petition: https://eci.ec.europa.eu/066/public/

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQRcK9nYg9g

1
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by martti@suppo.fi to c/socialism@beehaw.org
 

I really liked their content until i stumbled across a older video called "Ukraine: The Avoidable War" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LL4eNy4FCs8

This video is full of shit from a perspective of reality. It ignores russian imperialism, calls it proxy war between US and Russia (except it is democracy defending itself first from russian proxies then from russia itself), and somehow makes NATO the cause, except before 2014 it was as disorganized and weak. Also there were no promise of not expanding on east iirc. It points fair things like Hunter Biden case and the US intervention into Ukrainian elections etc. , but they are not so important, when considering why is war still going on. So I wonder if this video is shitty at facts, what if some others are as well?

view more: next ›