ech

joined 9 months ago
[–] ech@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

Perhaps. I'm gonna leave that determination up to the people doing the work, though. I don't think it's fair to try and convince a volunteer that an additional rule is or isn't too much work to manage.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

Take for example Harry Potter. In my personal opinion, the author is a trash person, and I personally will no longer invest my time, effort, or money into their franchise. However, the stories and lore and fan base are still good. There is an actor who had a recurring (and popular) role in Star Trek: TNG (and a few episodes of Voyageur) who turned out to be a trash person. But, the memes and other content being posted about their roles are still funny and entertaining.

The difference is the creators in question aren't the ones making that content. A webcomic about the world of Harry Potter created by someone else has levels of separation from the source material, but if JK started a webcomic, I would object to it being posted and promoted here.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I'll voice in favor of a banlist for bigoted artists. Letting bigots and other hateful people in with "relatable" content just normalizes their hateful material, even playing into possibly intentional "onroading" on their part to their prejudiced platform. It also reinforces the idea that targets of that hate need to "play nice" if they're not being targeted right then and there, and perpetuates the falsehood that these positions are a matter of "opinion" rather than an existential threat to the targeted.

A banlist would present a higher workload on the part of the mods, which is not something I feel can be demanded, but it would be helpful to have if the goal here is to create a welcoming environment.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago

...are you under the impression that the movies are advocating for such an event? That...that's not even close to right.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago

If everyone's using it, then it's still beneficial in obscuring your actual data. Even better since they can't just discard the date outright as it is a viable birthdate.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 day ago

Using memes as ads is bullshit. Reposting them is just as bad.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Xkcd illustrates the issue nicely: https://xkcd.com/1105/

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

That's still useful information to know how men feel, even if it's problematic. "Polling" algorithms is entirely fucking useless.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, it looks like there's a new, not-crazy (afaik) denuvo cracker in the scene, so a fair amount of shocked is appropriate.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Setting a different date every time sets a (probably unique) pattern. Everyone using the same date every time makes it useless.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Unfortunately.

 

I'm not sure if it's a growth issue, or if I'm just getting tired of it personally, but the spamming of identical URLs over multiple instances is getting out of hand. Even worse when I block one post for whatever reason, only to have to repeat the task upteen number of times because one or more users (usually one) "helpfully" post the link in every tangentially related community.

Instead of that, it'd be better to have the front page (all/local/subscribed) automatically group any post of an identical URL into a single "post". In essence, each new post of that URL would create a separate discussion thread to the given community, and each thread could be listed under the "main" post similar to how crossposts currently are instead of cluttering up the front page.

 

Just searched up info on dried ghasts and the dotwiki is listed above the fandom site. I don't think I've seen that before.

 

So I'm slowly learning how to us yt-dlp and I'm trying to set up a default command to check a number of channels for new videos. Currently I have it set to download the first 10 new vids of each channel, and to skip anything past a certain date, but it takes a while to get to the date information I guess, which adds unnecessary time and checks, especially for channels that don't have any vids that are new enough.

What I'd like it to do is skip the rest of the channel if it encounters a video that was published outside the given date range, but I'm not finding anything so far. Does this functionality exist? Or am I just out of luck?

My current command looks like this:

yt-dlp -t sleep -I1-10 --dateafter 20251031 --sponsorblock-remove sponsor --format "bestvideo*[filesize<3G]+bestaudio/best" --concurrent-fragments 25 --force-write-archive -o '%(uploader)s-%(upload_date)s-%(title)s [%(id)s].%(ext)s' --download-archive "archive.md" --batch-file "subscriptions.md"

 

I get and agree that more progressive candidates are a good thing, but how much unilateral power does the mayor of one city really have, even if it's NYC? Why is everyone, up to the top of the US government, chiming in on it?

 

I generally look forward to these little demo fests. While it's never exactly been a flood of mind blowing games, I usually find a handful of upcoming games that stand out and show some promise. This time around, though, I'm left dispirited by all the slop flooding the lists. Generated slop. Asset-flip slop. The few games that aren't I only find after wading through pages upon pages of rubbish, and then it's a crapshoot on if it seems worth downloading. I eventually gave up and don't have much interest in trying again.

I've long been a fan and supporter of the indie scene, understanding that the diamonds that make it worth it take effort to find. But if this is what we have to look forward to, I'm concerned how it'll fare as the requisite effort to sift through the dregs grows exponentially. Eventually it's just too much.

 

Currently, I have some filters set up through uBlock to make my Lemmy browsing more tolerable. For keywords, I copied some scripts that look like this, with one line and each word separated by a vertical bar: lemmy.ca##article.row:has-text(/keyword|keyword|keyword|etc/i)

But the url filters I use only seem to work if they are separated into individual lines, e.g.: lemmy.ca##div.post-listing:has([href*="url/"])

lemmy.ca##div.post-listing:has([href*="url/"])

I was wondering if it's possible to condense the url lines to make it a bit more manageable in the same way the keyword filter is.

 

The addition of copper tools in the next update (which I'm assuming will be somewhere between stone and iron) has me wondering what the benefit is to creating tools that fit on the lower end of the already existing tier list of materials. Like, I'm glad to see copper get some actual usable recipes, but stone to iron isn't exactly a long lasting gap even with the modern ore distributions, so the use case for these new tools is fairly non-existent.

Unless...

If copper tools (and the other materials) had perks that improved gameplay in meaningful ways, there'd be a reason to keep those old tools outside of the 5 minutes it takes to get the next material (another use-case of the new shelves being added, as well). I'm not clever enough to come up with what each material should get, but I'm sure there are good ideas out there. At the very least, it would give some possibility of new materials that are more than just "mines faster/hits harder than [material we added last update]."

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/35826959

$6:

Game Name Steam Link
Achilles: Legends Untold https://store.steampowered.com/app/1314000/Achilles_Legends_Untold/
Salt and Sacrifice https://store.steampowered.com/app/1437400/Salt_and_Sacrifice/
ELDERBORN https://store.steampowered.com/app/727850/ELDERBORN/

$10: All above, plus:

Game Name Steam Link
Steelrising https://store.steampowered.com/app/1283400/Steelrising/
Asterigos: Curse of the Stars https://store.steampowered.com/app/1731070/Asterigos_Curse_of_the_Stars/

$16: All above, plus:

Game Name Steam Link
Enotria: The Last Song https://store.steampowered.com/app/2102450/Enotria_The_Last_Song/
Flintlock: Deluxe Edition https://store.steampowered.com/app/1832040/Flintlock_The_Siege_of_Dawn/

I've only heard of I think two of these before, but never played them. What does this comm think of the pack? Worth it?

 

I downvoted maybe 3 posts for being "unwise", but I guess that's not allowed. Looked up the mod and they banned a wave of people, all for "...". Good stuff.

This "banned for using the functions of the website" shit is really getting out of hand. Unless it's unequivocal support for every post, you're out. It's ridiculous out here.

Also! We still can't block communities we've been banned from? Wtf?

 
1
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by ech@lemmy.ca to c/soulslike@lemmy.zip
 

I don't have many bombshells myself, unfortunately. Mostly just oldies and things I've been waiting on.

Hollow Knight is good for any price, but for $7.50 is a steal. Absolutely stellar game.

Another Crab's Treasure is an...interesting one. I haven't finished it, but it had fairly good combat, imo, and a very different atmosphere to the grimdark horrors we usually find in souls-likes. I do recall the leveling felt a bit lackluster, but maybe that was just me.

Nine Souls and TUNIC are two I've been considering for a little while now. I think I'll nab Tunic and wait on Nine Souls a little longer, personally. Death's Door also caught my eye at $5. Might be a good snag.

How about y'all? Any must haves with good deals this sale?

view more: next ›