binux

joined 6 days ago
[–] binux@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

That's ignoring the point. Retributive justice is inherently reactive. It doesn't improve upon any of the circumstances or motivations leading to someone committing a crime, thereby limiting it to a response only after it happens. Criminals don't commit crimes simply because they were "born that way". They do it because their life experiences led them to either a) believing they had to commit the crime to improve their situation, b) believing it's justifiable in their own warped sense of right and wrong, or c) severe mental illness. There's nothing in those causes that can't be accounted for or treated beforehand to prevent the act from occurring at all. All jail time is doing is putting them in a pressure cooker that will inevitably lead to the people sentenced being even further handicapped in their ability to function in society.

Mind you I'm not against separating criminals from society for an appropriate amount of time entirely. It's just that if the primary motivation with their sentence is punishment, you shouldn't expect anything greater than a neutral outcome.

[–] binux@sh.itjust.works 20 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

We should bring back throwing rotten fruit and vegetables at people like this. Maybe the pillory too while we're at it.

[–] binux@sh.itjust.works 43 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Cancer is suing the chemotherapy museum, who would have thought.

[–] binux@sh.itjust.works -3 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Jail isn't what's doing that, revoking his license does. The jail time is just an added slap on the wrist to make the people close to Perry feel better (which is absurd considering a guy literally died, retribution doesn't change that.) It doesn't actually solve anything.

[–] binux@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Plants need direct light to grow… most need full sun.

The humble Monotropa uniflora:

[–] binux@sh.itjust.works 12 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

This is what the paradox of tolerance is all about. Extending tolerance to those who are intolerant of others only serves to enable the rise and eventual dominance of intolerance, thus undermining the original principle. The only way to combat this is (ironically) to be intolerant of such behaviour on both a cultural and systemic level.

[–] binux@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago

Oh I agree completely. People tend to not realize that we’re still biologically identical to Humans from over 100 000 years ago aside from the odd irrelevant difference. Nothing’s really changed in that regard.

[–] binux@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The more pathetic decisions governments push worldwide like this, the more I start to feel like we're still in the middle ages. Of course the difference being now all the power-hungry degenerates know just how much to wring out of the lowly civilians without letting them figure out who to blame.

[–] binux@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

You got me, I'm actually Walt Disney's frozen head on a burner account

[–] binux@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't see how this is a solution so much as delaying the problem for future generations to deal with. What happens when the countries the immigrants are coming from start to face the same issue (if it isn't happening for them already?) It's basically the population equivalent of the "one more lane bro" philosophy.

 
 
view more: next ›