Sertou

joined 2 years ago
[–] Sertou@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

It wasn't an "inescapable prison," it was a county jail in a small Indiana town.

[–] Sertou@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

My point is that there never was a utopian setting. Utopia's are perfect by definition and therefore boring. The Federation is something much more interesting than a utopia. It's an imperfect culture that aspires to better itself in the attempt to achieve utopian ideals. That it fails and tries again is part of what makes Star Trek interesting.

[–] Sertou@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Because from a literary and media standpoint, utopias are boring. The Federation has never been a utopia. It is a post scarcity society with utopian ideals, but with plenty of flaws to balance out those ideals. In the TOS era, those flaws included penal colonies, the death penalty, albeit for only one crime, contacting Talos IV and lots of infighting among member worlds.

Without conflict, there is no drama. Star Trek has long found conflict in pitting the Federation against less high-minded adversaries, the Klingons and Romulans, the Borg, the Cardassians and the Dominion, the Kazon, etc. That is fine but after 60 years it is also sort of played out.

To your point about Discovery, it's first season took place before the Federation's ideals were fully codified in policy - general order 1 had yet to become "the prime directive" for example.

TNG trek took place later and was closer to the utopian ideal. But still wasn't perfect. The Federation tried to force Data to undergo study as a guinea pig and tried to take his daughter from him for the same reason, they supported unaligned worlds against internal dissent and left untold numbers of Federation citizens to the mercy of the Cardassians in the interest of keeping the peace.

During the Dominion War, the Federation was fine with setting aside it's ideals as a matter of survival.

During the burn, the federation no longer had the resources to support it's high ideals so it shrank and degenerated. Now. It is on the ascendant again, able to right past wrongs.

[–] Sertou@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And TNG has appearances from several TOS cast members reprising their original roles; Deforest Kelly, James Doohan, Mark Leonard and Leonard Nimoy.

[–] Sertou@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Not every show appeals to every Trek fan.

Just as Enterprise didn't appeal to me, so Academy won't to others. But if the show goes on long enough it may attract those trekkers who find appeal in a semi-angsty drama among a college age cast in a progressive academic setting.

[–] Sertou@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Eh, TNG had a rough start too, but became awesome. Note that it took two plus seasons to become consistently good.

Academy has lots of rough spots, especially in the writing, but it is not irredeemable. It just needs time to find its tone and audience.

[–] Sertou@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Nice! K'tinga class isn't it?

[–] Sertou@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

The cast of Blacklist was amazing. The writers, less so. They spent so much time telling us how brilliant Elizabeth was, but barely ever showed us. What they showed us most often is that the only way they knew to create conflict was to have her do the absolute stupidist thing possible in nearly every situation.

[–] Sertou@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

“I, Daniel Quinn, neither the first nor the last of a line of such Quinns, set eyes on Maud the wondrous on a late December day in 1849 on the banks of the river of aristocrats and paupers, just as the great courtesan, Magdalena Colon, also known as La Ultima, a woman whose presence turned men into spittling, masturbating pigs, boarded a skiff to carry her across the river’s icy water from Albany to Greenbush, her first stop en route to the city of Troy, a community of iron, where later that evening she was scheduled to enact, yet again, her role as the lascivious Lais, that fabled prostitute who spurned Demosthenes’ gold and yielded without fee to Diogenes the virtuous, impecunious tub-dweller.”

Quinn's Book by William Kennedy

[–] Sertou@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

When my previous independent pharmacist went out of business, they transfered all of my prescriptions to the nearest Walgreens. I switched to another "independent" that was part of Rite-aid's network. The staff were poorly trained in customer service communications, passive aggressively taking control of every conversation and then not listening. I had multiple instances of prescriptions being lost or delayed, in one case for weeks. The owners didn't care why I as a customer found these experiences frustrating and eventually told me I should just go to Walgreen's. I did and the customer service has been so much better. Independent isn't always better.

[–] Sertou@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

The beauty of open source is that Google can't take it back. The worst they can do is close source their own future development. Meanwhile, the community can fork the last open source release of AOSP. Look at what open source devs did with Audacity, for example.

The real fly in the ointment here is Google already did with device trees and driver binaries for Pixel phones; no longer sharing these with AOSP will have a very chilling effect on custom ROM developers who must now reverse engineer needed configs and drivers.

view more: next ›