Echinoderm

joined 2 years ago
[–] Echinoderm@aussie.zone 3 points 5 hours ago

Personally, I like games where you start as a relative nobody and have to claw your way to success. I enjoy how in Kenshi you start having the snot beaten out of you by absolutely everything, but can eventually have the skills and equipment to be taking out whole factions.

You are right about the lack of support though. I think the intention is to play to fail and learn from mistakes, but it's a harsh lesson when you wander into a new area only to be knocked out and imprisoned by cannibals. I don't have the fortitude to keep failing, so end up just using the wiki at times.

[–] Echinoderm@aussie.zone 2 points 6 hours ago

I think this guy needs to consider the difference between invisible and intangible.

If I pay for an invisible hotdog, I still expect it to taste delicious.

[–] Echinoderm@aussie.zone 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or an uninhabited island that becomes full of cannibals.

[–] Echinoderm@aussie.zone 80 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Don't forget being able to treat women like property!

[–] Echinoderm@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago

This couldn't possibly be the supermarket duopoly using current events to raise grocery prices to the point they drive inflation, and then mysteriously not dropping prices once the situation has passed... again. Could it?

[–] Echinoderm@aussie.zone 0 points 1 month ago

I didn't expect John Farnham scholarship as part of this topic, but I'm into it.

[–] Echinoderm@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago

My warlock was a dandy with a fey patron who would buy a new outfit whenever he had a chance to spend money. It was a fun character.

[–] Echinoderm@aussie.zone 66 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As someone that age, "old but not very old" is an accurate reflection of how I feel.

[–] Echinoderm@aussie.zone 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Please define social media for me, because it seems like everyone’s take on it is “a website where you interact with others”, which is way too broad and I would say that applies to the entire internet then, which is a slippery slope.

That is effectively the definition from my understanding. Lemmy, Reddit, and similar boards are social media because the content is primarily user-generated.

It probably feels like the entire internet because it's where many of us are spending most of our time.

[–] Echinoderm@aussie.zone 35 points 1 month ago

The perception that it's primarily powerful men is a distortion from the Epstein files. Those are the ones that can traffic victims maybe, but more often sexual assaults on children are by people known to the victim, like family or friends of family.

[–] Echinoderm@aussie.zone 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Which one has the greedy attitude if the parents decide "only one of our children gives a shit about me, the rest suck" and chooses to leave it to one child?

Are the greedy ones the other children who say "screw that, show me the money"?

Or is the greedy one the child that says "I sacrificed economically and personally to do unpaid domestic labour, now I'm getting paid back for my kindness"?

263
Side Projects (media.piefed.social)
 
 

Movies have huge credit rolls that tell you everyone involved from the director down to the person who made the cups of tea. But why? I can understand why actors, who need exposure to maintain a career, would want this. But is it important for the person who drove the truck full of props around to be credited for their future prospects?

You don't see a plaque when you walk into a building listing everyone who laid a brick as part of the construction. I assume there's a historical reason why the entertainment industry, and only the entertainment industry does this.

Edit: To all those that took my geniune question about what historically lead to this, and turned it into accusations of me being some sort of thoughtless "asshole", what is even the point of someone trying to contribute to these online communities if you are just going to be made to feel horrible?

 

The High Court has backed a decision by the government to refuse a temporary visa to American commentator Candace Owens Farmer, who had planned a speaking tour to Australia in 2024.

Owens's lawyers argued the decision placed an "impermissible burden" on the implied right to freedom of political communication, and Immigration Minister Tony Burke had incorrectly interpreted the law.

The High Court found the law was valid and applied in circumstances where the person in question would encourage dissension or strife, risking harm to the Australian community.

 

As long as I'm enjoying myself it's not a bad thing, right?

 
 

Can anyone clarify what this community is for? The only post here suggests it's to replace the auslaw subreddit, which is mostly lawyers shit-talking about the legal profession and a lot of fun. However it's got the same name as the auslegal subreddit, which is a train wreck of non-lawyers asking other non-lawyers legal questions and getting terrible hot takes and badly Googled answers in reply.

view more: next ›