I for one like both Nintendo and Valve, and the few Nintendo game discussions I read had as much obligatory "Nintendo bad" complaints as every Valve thread has obligatory "Valve bad" comments. I'm finding those complainers more obnoxious even, because at least Nintendo criticism usually sticks to posts already criticising Nintendo.
Datz
He (or anyone from the Japan branch, I think) didn't have anything to do with the last one, so it didn't matter. It's only recently that he started getting interested.
People seem to be confused about why they thought this is a good idea, but to me this is expected.
I don't follow what Miyamoto does much, but based on what I heard (like Chris Pratt Mario...) I feel he's a showoff who probably wants ANY live-action movie of a Nintendo IP because it'd be cool. Zelda is the best one to qualify, maybe Metroid or Xenoblade (both of which are way less popular). They even tried more realism back with Twilight Princess.
I actually expect it'll be more or less like the Mario movie again, an unimpressive but solid success.
Heard someone drop Rick & Morty for that (not for the drop in quality). I assume you wouldn't want to discuss it with creeps, but the problematic media are popular enough that it should be easy to find sensible subgroups online.
If you're insecure about public or (shitty) friends' opinion, you might also not want the association. Which I'd say is a coward thought, but I hide playing some games too.
The irony didn't occur to me, I got a chuckle out of this.
But to play devil's advocate for him, the game's outlandishly sci-fi with "space ninjas", and the actual players typically don't chat like gun nuts.
I remember when I was a kid who joined a mostly American guild with Discord server in Warframe.
I was so confused when I wrote the time in 24h and the guy I was chatting with seemed genuinely uncomfortable with me writing in military jargon.
(He also believed in ghosts and I had trouble explaining the difference between additive and multiplicative multipliers to him)
"Initial support for upcoming Steam Machine hardware"
I'll take any news I guess
Again, reviews? Game demos? Those are already excuses if they wanted to (and could in the first place, since refunds are probably required by law, as the other reply). This fps prediction IS customer service.
Should we remove hardware requirements or reviews, because then you could argue you weren't informed about the game not being your type? Are game demos bad?
Informing the customer being bad sounds backwards. This could only backfire if the fps prediction is wrong, and I still think for most people this would a positive, I wanted a feature like this.
Extra smoothness for a frame of input delay is a good boon for any non-action games that just have cool animation. Or even less hardcore action games. I'm one of the few people who doesn't want the higher fps for gameplay, I just think 30 -> 60 looks better. On the other hand, I don't see the 60->120 jump well.
I never used framegen though, because Steam Deck is all I have and didn't play around much.
Is this a smaller title? I'm wondering if the 50/60 price tag is an exception or if they'll actually decrease prices going forward.
Either way, I have enough Switch 1 games in my backlog that I'll pass on it and most S2 games for now. I haven't actually played a mainline Splatoon game yet.