Awoo

Nice ad hominem

Debate pervert

Huh?

Do you have a reading comprehension problem or are you just inventing something completely different to what I said to get mad about and then slapping a bunch of slogans on the end (one of which is just liberal) like it adds something?

I don't think anyone needs to see the body cam footage of a labradoodle in a knicks shirt running up to give people hugs and kisses before being shot by psychopaths?

Just look at the dog.

There is absolutely zero possible chance that animal was a threat to anyone.

Nobody is going to even try to say otherwise, anyone that does will not be taken seriously by anyone who is being honest.

Is all good, anyone questioning it can run through those questions themselves.

I also like to ask people where Cuba gets their weapons, ammunition and fuel from. Also Burkina Faso, Venezuela, Bolivia (under MAS), Iran (who supplies palestinian resistance), DPRK, etc etc. Some of which they'll object to being mentioned in the anti-imperialist camp at all but the question still remains, where do they get their weapons, supplies, fuel and other essentials from and what happens if that place suddenly didn't exist tomorrow because nato magically eliminated it or whatever the fuck goes through these people's heads.

Every single anti-imperialist group in the world requires them to survive. Thus the position is quite complex for anti-imperialists, even those that don't necessarily approve of all actions occurring. But needless to say, nato is certainly the biggest threat to us in the world. Nobody has to like the current situation but understanding the geopolitical reality we exist in is essential.

As for the ban, maybe premature, I try to teach even the baby leftists and assume naivity. I'm often proven wrong about being so patient though.

Yeah it's clearly a nationalist position that lacks self-awareness that it's nationalism. I just kinda wanted to steer through that without an accusatory "you're a nationalist" line that would only provoke extreme defensiveness.

My next step is usually to ask what happens if their country goes socialist tomorrow. Who are the immediate enemies? Who are the immediate new potential trading partners? Where do they get weapons and ammunition from to defend their revolution?

The answers to these questions most people can usually get correct by themselves, without me pointing them out. And these answers lead people to why anti-nato is the position of socialists in europe, and also why socialists in europe are not explicitly anti-russia either. The situation for socialists is not the same situation faced by liberals but many would-be socialists (who aren't in orgs) get strung along by the liberals into mistakenly believing it is because they do not have an org guiding them.

Problem is that for European leftists right wing Russian authoritarian regime is the biggest threat

Socialist orgs in Europe are pretty much all anti-nato. Liberals are not the left, they are the center-right. The only place in the world that calls liberals "left" is amerikkka.

I assure you that no org nor individual with an anti-nato position thinks Russia is "the biggest threat". The position is held by all of these orgs because US imperialism is the biggest and most dangerous threat to the left in the world responsible for many tens of millions of socialist deaths and has been ever since ww2.

I'm not even sure why you think socialists would care whether european billionaires, amerikkkan billionaires or russian billionaires get to exploit the working class. The nationalist battles over borders just determine who gets to exploit which members of the working class. What matters to socialists is who is harming and preventing socialist movements the most. The position of socialists is that the battles over borders should stop, period, not that one side is better than any other. Taking one side over the other is ultimately just throwing your hat in with one group of billionaires over the other instead of acknowledging the problem causing this is the entire international system.

The government restricts citizens access to the Internet (among other things). I have talked to people from Russia, people from China, etc online. But I have never talked to someone from North Korea and that is a pretty big red flag for me.

And how many people from the DPRK have you actually tried to speak to? There are many in China and many in Russia, some as naturalised citizens, not to mention tens of thousands work officially in Africa.

You seem to accept that information about the DPRK is unreliable, but rather than allow this to create a position of neutrality in yourself you seem to instead default to vibes. The problem with defaulting to vibes is that those are specifically what propaganda is effective at manipulating. The vibes about the DPRK that you have are entirely a construction of western media and comment sections.

When I don't know about something the first thing I do is take myself to the most neutral position possible - "I don't know". That is the starting point from which facts should be fed.

Hello @cole@lemdro.id you seem to have conveniently ignored my response?

Does every american have equally valid input on america and its politics?

When the next person says "I know someone from Britain and they said London is a no go zone" should I take them automatically seriously? Should I take their opinion on migrants and small boats seriously or should I maybe do some more serious investigation?

You dated a Korean, so what? Why should anyone take this one person's take over serious investigation of the matter?

EVERYWHERE has its problems.

And yes, that is the DPRK too.

Sure, I don't deny that. The issue here is what are they? You don't know. I've actually visited and I could talk about some, but they'd be quite different to what you would talk about I suspect.

I've dated a Korean and been to Korea which has influenced me quite a lot.

Koreans in the south typically react with surprise whenever anyone on the left refers to what the US did in Korea as a genocide. Most of them have barely any knowledge of the five "republics" before the existing one, the sixth. Unless your partner was a trade unionist within the ROK I generally wouldn't trust them to know what they're talking about, much like I don't trust the average liberal or magat to know what they're talking about when it comes to the US, its history of barbarism or how it interacts with the world today. The trade unionists within ROK however do know their shit, I've spoken to a few of them and they're cool comrades (but are legally not allowed to say they are)

if you can't admit the obvious problems with the DPRK

The problems you've only ever absorbed through the lens of extremely dubious western media reporting whose sources for reporting come from either the CIA or NIS(formerly KCIA but renamed to make it less obvious the south is an occupied state) ?

You say "obvious" the same way the Dothraki say "It is known". You consider this information obvious because a lot of people say it, you never consider whether a lot of people only say it because they too see a lot of other people saying it. You do not know the facts at all.

Calling anyone "insane" is always ableism.

You are using mental illness as an insult.

Just like calling anyone gay as an insult is always homophobic.

At this point nothing will stop me having a visceral negative reaction to AI being added to any product after literally every single other implementation in literally every other product has been annoying fucking dogshit. It could be the best thing ever and I'd still react negatively because I never want to hear the god damn word again.