also booked in connection with images on his cell of child abuse
If true, that's burying the lede lol
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
also booked in connection with images on his cell of child abuse
If true, that's burying the lede lol
"He totally got in our way to bring Kirk's killer to justice. He will pay for this crime...and we also found child abuse on his phone. "
Kind of says all you need to know about the regime’s priorities, regardless of how they bleat about “saving the children” (for grooming and abuse by their buddies behind closed doors, I surmise)
Wait... Was this the same guy they first arrested immediately after the shooting?
Yes but from what I've heard, he's the local red-pilled nutjob that is already known to local police which is why they were totally confused by Patel going on live TV and announcing they "had the shooter in custody" after he was initially arrested after the shooting.
That's hilarious. Where did you hear that part of the story?
The QAA podcast.
Are they now searching for the kids? Also, Goodbye any weak illusion of privacy we gaslit ourselves into believing we had.
illusion of privacy
Are you talking about them looking through his phone? Because I don't think anyone is under the illusion that they can't do that when you confess to murdering someone.
They can't compel you to give up your phone's password or pattern, but they can compel you to open it with biometrics.
Why would they need to do that when backdoors are mandated by law, if it's a US company doing business compelled by US law?
Are they? I know that unlocking a phone and bypassing encryption are different, but I hadn’t heard this before.
Maybe
The NSA types have back doors, your local police are not going to be able to get in on that, what they do have is programs that will open up Limitless instances of your password and guess it with a bit of time.