No.
It’s not complicated. Anyone that tries to inject nuance into this simple question is not to be taken seriously.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
No.
It’s not complicated. Anyone that tries to inject nuance into this simple question is not to be taken seriously.
Nope
If Donald Trump remains President beyond Jan 2029, he won't need to be elected to do it.
Can Trump make a boot so big even the media can’t lick it?
Not legally, no.
Why the downvotes?
Dumb article and OP is dumb for sharing it. This shouldn't even be a discussion or debate.
Because there's no reason to write a headline that implies this is an open question. The answer is no, and implying it could be anything but no is irresponsible. Someone reading a headline alone should be told that so if that's all they read they don't think the answer is more complicated than that.
He will certainly try to and hopefully not succeed.
What’s stopping Trump from having a puppet run for President and he as Vice President? The puppet could then step down after Inauguration Day.
The argument I’ve heard being, the Vice President isn’t elected but appointed.
Edit:
Does the 12th Amendment negate that argument? The last sentence in the amendment seems to suggest so.
Now this is a legitimate argument discussion. How is the law interpreted. I'm not a constitutional scholar, so I have no idea. But this is a much better topic of discussion than what OP posted.
To be VP, you have to be eligible for the top spot. Trump will have already served twice so he's no longer eligible.
What position is after VP?