this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

News

37279 readers
2277 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (9 children)

Yes, keep making enemies of the billionaires that got this administration into office and spent millions of dollars to do so. I'd very much love that for you.

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Good thing this isn't a country that came about because a bunch of rich white dudes got tired of being taxed and started a revolution.

[–] ggppjj@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (19 children)

That possibly reframing "no taxation without representation" a bit but I don't entirely disagree with the sentiment.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They thought funding Trump would get them representation. They were wrong. Trump cares about no one but himself.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The billionaires have thus far been too cheap to amass private armies to directly enforce their own will. Why, when you can lobby Congress for the price of a used Hyundai Sonata to get the Army to do what you want?

The government holds the power of violence and Trump holds the power of the government. The billionaires will be reminded of that if they get out of line. Coincidentally, this is the arrangement of modern Russia.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

they have been too cheap thus far.

I'm pretty sure that Bezos had enough money to bribe moderate chunks of the army.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Personnel is one thing.

Modern warfighting is outrageously expensive. Guided munitions can cost hundreds of thousands each. Armored vehicles cost millions. Combat aircraft, tens of millions. And it continues to cost tons of money just to keep them in a bunker ready to go.

They will balk at the cost of owning/operating even a single Arleigh-Burke destroyer.

There is a reason they're all too happy to keep letting you and me indirectly fund their military aspirations through taxes.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 0 points 11 months ago

this is part of why it's important for everyone to pay attention to the asymmetric warfare being conducted in Ukraine. for one, it's a genocide, don't look away and speak for their liberation just like i hope everyone is speaking up for all colonized peoples, like Mayans, Darfurians, Congolese, Palestinians, and Uyghers. for another the skills demostrated may become necessary in the near future

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Insane that the rich hate taxes so much, that they're willing to put literal narcissist criminal idiots in charge thinking "I can definitely control and predict this guy's behavior and surely that will be good for my business rather than just not having a 37th yacht and paying taxes and making the world an objectively better place not only for the other 7 billion inhabitants but probably more stable for my own interests as well."

If we weren't all being tossed into the furnace with them, it would be something I'd never stop laughing at.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

That’ll get the people grumbling.

Walmart should also do this.

Grocery stores too.

[–] Novocirab@feddit.org 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Thoughts on how to make this happen:

  • Ask your local cashiers and other store clerks how come the prices rose, and whether that really is all tariffs. Again and again. And ideally so that other shoppers overhear it.

  • Make angry social media posts explicitly asking the same, explicitly tagging your local store and/or the chain to which they belong, and muse about looking into their competitors.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

would be a great add-on for firefox, though

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 0 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Incredibly hard to source that data from the outside. Even if you can identify the suppliers, different parts of an assembly may be classified differently, even between different importers who may have partial exemptions.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 0 points 11 months ago

either way it would be free speech if an add-on or a website did it.

but those days are over.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Try realistic

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago

MAGAts are the ones that are hostile to our pocketbooks.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 0 points 11 months ago

"How dare you offer clarity about what we've done!"

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 0 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Amazon .com denied a report on Tuesday that it planned to disclose the cost that U.S. tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump were adding to its products, after the White House blasted the initial story.

https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/white-house-amazon-tariff-price-announcement-is-hostile-2025-04-29/

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Bezos is a sniveling coward.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The dude looks like he keeps a half billion in cash on him at all times to try and buy his way out of the angry mob(s) that will eventually come for him... Because he's that much of a doucher.

What's really insane is that even with all his money, the best he can do for a wife is some kind of plastic surgery experiment that looks like it came out of the Tool Prison Sex music video.

Just so afraid of losing a small amount of the fortune he can't spend in his lifetime, that he's given up the true power that comes with that type of wealth. The power to help

[–] sir_pronoun@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Hey, talk for yourself, there are a lot of us who would love to be married to anything from a Tool video, and we don't like being insulted

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Maybe this will show him that you can't buy Trumps loyalty because he has no loyalty. However, I have my doubts that even Trump going from going from "My good buddy Bezos" to "Amazon is the enemy" in the course of a day will be enough of a object lesson for Bozos.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He's already backtracking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hypeerror@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

You see Jeff, once you start groveling to the autocrat you are not allowed to stop.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

"but all I wanted was an even more negative tax rate and to be able to fire workers for getting hurt on the job! I didn't want the dictator to threaten me with the window treatment"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] qantravon@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Seemingly because their stock price started to fall due to the Trump admin's reaction. Which, what? Why would that negatively impact their stock?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I would call this move by Amazon honest.

[–] charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago

I thought the same but apparently Amazon back-tracked like the wimps they are. It would have been the right thing to do but the fact they gave up on it makes a lot more sense.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Nah, it's pragmatic. This way Amazon can go, 'see we didn't raise OUR prices, the extra cost is from the tarrifs'.

If they wanted to be honest they would also mention that Bezos and Amazon donated millions (that we know of) to Trump's campaign AND inauguration fund, and Trump is why we have the tariffs in the first place.

If you literally GIVE someone a gun, and bullets, knowing full well that they aren't mentally stable, and they kill someone, you ARE responsible. At the very least, an accessory. In this case, co-conspirator is the more appropriate term.

[–] Regna@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (3 children)

As a European, I must thank the US for making my pet products cheaper. Way cheaper. Way cheaper than I could ever expect.

I just wish I could buy these products, these same products, without ruining the world and my morality as well.

But what am I talking about… my cats deserve litter robots at 90 % discount.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Be wary of giving the robot your WiFi password though

[–] Idontevenknowanymore@mander.xyz 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I set up a guest network called "Chinese Spy Devices" that is behind a VPN and all my electronics that need an internet connection go there. Have fun talking to each other guys!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] some_dude@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It seems he's amping up his language. I think he recently said a former associate was guilty of treason.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Scary how that’s plausible, drowned out in the noise, and totally accepted as normal (or even cheered) by the public.

[–] Absaroka@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

While it sounds like Amazon already capitulated, I'm guessing they'll switch gears when their customers start complaining about the rise in prices.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago

"free speech"

Never ever take fascists at their word, they're all bullshitting you always.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I was wondering when retailers would do this. American retailers do this with all other large taxes and fees. Why would this be any different?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Every single retailer needs to start displaying two prices on products. "Price w/o Tariff: $6.99 / Your Price: $18.99"

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 0 points 11 months ago

We could help with those “I did this” stickers - do a little homework ahead of time and calculate certain items X% lower. At this point it just needs to be reasonable; that side has no quarter to call US out for bending the truth.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Amazon had already listed import and duty fee way before this. These fees are just now a lot larger and more "visible".

Tarrifs = Tax

The tax is paid by local business and then passed onto consumers in higher cost of goods.

FYI, generally when you buy items on Amazon and the goods are not locally stocked in Amazon's warehouse for same day delivery, Amazon acts like a broker for you helping facilitate the import of goods. The import fee is then passed onto you as the "importer" directly. Things that Amazon stocks locally but imported themselves will just increase in price and a label may not show the import fee paid for by amazon at the time they imported the product or item.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

The truth is usually hostile to this administration.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Trump: “We’re increasing foreign prices because we want consumers to prefer buying American.”

Retailers: “These foreign goods are more expensive than American-made ones.”

Trump: “How dare you tell them that!”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Isn't customary in the US to publish the prices before taxes and then ar last moment add all the local and state taxes?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] boreengreen@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago

Why anounce this? Just do it.

[–] Talaraine@fedia.io 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wonder if Bezos will ask for his money back

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

I’m sure there is a newer version available; probably an Amazon off-brand even.

[–] DeadNinja@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But these tariff costs are going to be paid by China just like you promised, right Don ? RIGHT ????

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›