this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
191 points (96.1% liked)

Political Memes

11892 readers
69 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Rooki@lemmy.world
automodbeta@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
Lasherz12@lemmy.world
FauxPseudo@lemmy.world
191
The left eats its own (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by mutant_zz@lemmy.world to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

The true purity test of a leftist is that they have to like cats

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The left? That’s just two flavour of tankies.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No? Maoists and Marxist-Leninists (aka Stalinists) are tankies, but Marxists are not.

[–] ftbd@feddit.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why are Marxist-Leninists the same as Stalinists? I don't think Lenin would have been too excited about Stalinism

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Marxism–Leninism was developed from Bolshevism by Joseph Stalin in the 1920s based on his understanding and synthesis of classical Marxism and Leninism.

-Wikipedia. The term Marxist-Leninism was coined by Stalin to give legitimacy to his ideas.

[–] ftbd@feddit.org 5 points 1 year ago

I wasn't aware of that, thanks!

[–] yesman@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If the left could unite behind the Democratic nominee, Harris would have likely never been president.

Because the 2024 election would have been the end of Hillary's reign and the candidates would probably be different.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 3 points 1 year ago

Why would the left want to unite behind the right?

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hillary’s reign

I have no idea what that is. Please enlighten me.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hillary ran for president in 2016 against trump.

But I guess both the left and right and undecided all agree with one rule about presidency: cannot be a woman.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 1 points 1 year ago

but she never "reigned"?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure how that makes sense. If the left united behind Harris and that mattered she'd be president no?