this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
244 points (98.8% liked)

politics

31232 readers
2236 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If "migrants" have no right to appeal to the courts, citizens don't really have the ability to either.

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If "migrants" have no right to appeal to the courts, citizens don't really have the ability to either.

"Oh he'd never do that to real Americans..."

Meanwhile, the leopards are waiting.

The leopards yearn for the faces.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Consider?

Pretty sure they've been doing that from the start.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

*Trying to suspend

The headline is not doing constitutional democracy and the rule of law any favors by making casual readers think they have that power, which (sorry to be all technical, NYT) they do not have.

(sorry to be all technical, NYT)

No reason to apologize. The NYT routinely do it on purpose, especially when it comes to cops and Israel.

[–] opus86@lemmy.today 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I doubt this administration is going to stop pushing it's lawlessness unless there is push back with consequences. Throw Stephen Miller into a CIA black site and watch how fast this crazy shit stops.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

Stephen Miller? The migrant? Yeah, sounds good. I heard he crossed the Darien Gap by eating five toddlers as rations.

[–] Inucune@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How do you know they are an illegal immigrant without a judge?

[–] whatalute@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Are the immigrants the whit....I mean RIGHT skin color?? Cause this administration is filled to the brim with stable geniuses who are ✨ magically ✨ able to tell who is legal and who isn't. We should tottaaaaalllly trust their judgement without question, they just want what's best for the country, with absolutely NO ulterior motives.

/S

[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

it will be clear as day they’ll have MS13 photoshopped photos.