ReallyActuallyFrankenstein

joined 2 years ago

Ah, interesting. Honestly, glad I don't see it.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 27 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Not everyone wins in a failing economy. If one billionaire makes out, three more lose money.

No, yeah, that's true. But the billionaires are also competing with each other in a (perceived) zero-sum game and they believe the ones who are cozying closest to Trump will be the best ones positioned to make money - either in a corrupt or a failing economy. But every recession has been a golden opportunity for billionaires.

Heck, in post-collapse Russia, this is how oligarchs first appeared - the "shock therapy" of the 1990s transition to a market economy dropped the value of resources to nothing, and the rich at the time bought them and became the ultra-rich. Some didn't make it. ( Like a super-bacteria forming from the ones not killed by antibiotics, the ones that survived were even more resistant to control.)

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 128 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (15 children)

Let's say the pre-Trump economy is worth $100 trillion, and a particular billionaire's share is $2 billion. Let's say Trump catastrophically decreases the economy's value to $50 trillion, while increasing corruption such that that Trump is getting more power, and the billionaire's share is $10 billion.

This is followed by a collapsing market that creates a dip in share prices or private valuation, the assets of which can be bought for pennies on the dollar, eventually leading to that billionaire having $30 billion in a total economy worth $20 trillion.

Win/win for Trump and the billionaire, at the cost of everyone else.

That's basically what's happening, and will continue to happen.

Thank you for pointing this out. I made a small clarification for when anyone sees my comment first, but you're totally right.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Edit: See Silence7's comment below, unlisted planned locations and expansions may undermine the conclusions.

My observations:

The list adds more evidence that Trump/Miller are actively planning to use ICE to interfere with polling in 2026 and (their hope is) 2028. The following states are states that are potentially contestable either as Biden '20-Trump'24 swing states or are close enough to swing that ICE's racial profiling against primarily Latinos may swing demographics. These are getting high amounts of ICE buildout (Edit: Per the limited, incomplete list of planned locations on Wired):

  • Arizona (2)
  • Florida (5) (*2026 senate seat)
  • Michigan (3) (*2026 senate seat)
  • North Carolina (2) (*2026 senate seat)
  • Pennsylvania (5)
  • Texas (6) (*2026 senate seat)
  • Virginia (3) (*2026 senate seat)

California is also getting 5, and that may reflect the plan to use it as the next flashpoint state. Since California may be seen as more likely to be volatile, I could imagine the plan is to replicate Minnesota in California this summer. They may assume they will succeed in getting Fox News-ready violent response footage if they continue acting illegally, and use that propaganda to try to give cover to the Insurrection Act, leading to an antifa "anti-terrorist" push, which then is used nationwide to justify ICE at high-value House/Senate swing district polling stations in the fall.

States that Trump were previously trialing ICE takeover but are safely democratic (Oregon, Illinois) are NOT getting significantly more offices, which again suggests they don't intend to try to swing those. Neither is Minnesota. That is likely because Trump (i.e., Miller) isn't going to risk more bad PR there. He knows murdering Nice White People™ is the red line for most of the low-information public who will shrug at "is it or isn't it" fascism otherwise. Minnesota served its purpose as proving ground for the tactics and violence they plan to use.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, you in turn nailed it. To paraphrase the Godfather, we have a peacetime government and we need a wartime government - not because we are asking for it, but because we have one party that is already attempting to actively overturn democracy, and there is no clear opposition strategy.

Not sure who is downvoting this.

Oh, people are downvoting? I don't see anything (lemmynsfw disables downvotes). Didn't think I was saying anything controversial. Oh well.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 33 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (12 children)

Types of congresspeople:

  • I'm here for the power: Mostly staying.

  • I'm here because I believe in true left causes: Mostly staying.

  • I'm here because I am a democrat and there's literally nothing wrong: Mostly staying.

  • I'm here for the money or conservative principles, never intended to change anything, and didn't sign up for this shit: Retiring to my Swiss chalet.

The article cites some democrats that are retiring to run for higher office. Great, anecdotal, but the only data they provide shows it's basically a Republican retirement wave. Overall I think it's a wash.

The retiring republicans will be replaced in small part by democrats if there is a blue wave and reasonably fair election, but many are fake MAGA (i.e., voting with Trump 100% of the time, but they don't like it and privately think it beneath them) who will be replaced by true-believer MAGA who are going to try to actively push us faster into fascism.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

To the huge part of the population that vehemently reject any ideas that feel external, the hardest part of convincing someone is making it seem like it's their idea. All of those facts were never going to change their mind when they were reported on. It had to be their own realization that, ok, I don't like racist pedophile con men liars.

Fox News figured out how - it got root access to their brains and rewrote the whole OS - but for regular people to try to convince them of one obvious fact, we practically need to act out the entire movie Inception.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 45 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Massie: We need to get rid of Epstein's BFF, the notorious ally to a child sex trafficker can't be allowed to remain in power. We need to focus all our attention and energy on the most important one. I'm talking of course about - you know who I'm going to say...

...Howard Lutnick.

How dare he put Trump's agenda in jeopardy!

Others have said Mother 3 and AM2R which are both legendary.

Another one is Game Center CX: Arino no Chousenjou 2. The sheer variety of era-faithful but still original games is wild, and the translation is an impressive labor of love.

 

The shocking investigative exposé, now available in full.

 

She will report directly to David Ellison.

Archive link

 

I teach 18 year olds who range in reading levels from preschool to college, but the majority of them are in the lower half that range. I am devastated by what AI and social media have done to them. My kids don’t think anymore. They don’t have interests. Literally, when I ask them what they’re interested in, so many of them can’t name anything for me. Even my smartest kids insist that ChatGPT is good “when used correctly.” I ask them, “How does one use it correctly then?” They can’t answer the question. They don’t have original thoughts. They just parrot back what they’ve heard in TikToks. They try to show me “information” ChatGPT gave them. I ask them, “How do you know this is true?” They move their phone closer to me for emphasis, exclaiming, “Look, it says it right here!” They cannot understand what I am asking them. It breaks my heart for them and honestly it makes it hard to continue teaching. If I were to quit, it would be because of how technology has stunted kids and how hard it’s become to reach them because of that.

https://archive.ph/pS48G

 

Just sharing an issue I'm having, and glad if there's any potential solution. Thank you either way for your work on this app!

Issue: In any post comment tree, comments with images (or comments that are just images) appear as in the first example image - DominusOfMegadeus's post is just empty on my Connect for Android app. If I long-press and choose "Open," it will open a browser to the hosted instance and the image will show correctly, as in the second image.

Troubleshooting: I looked everywhere in the settings (both in Connect and in my instance's settings) and can't find something that could be limiting this.

Is this a bug? Or is there a fix I'm just missing?

view more: next ›